Use the following outline to compose your case analysis of the court’s written opinion. Your case analysis should be written in your own words, do not copy and paste from the opinion. You ca

law case study and need guidance to help me learn.

CITATION:
Farris BRYANT, a minor, by his next friend Diana Bryant, and Diana Bryant, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Mark LIVIGNI, Defendant and National Super Markets, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 5-92-0141, Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. 619 N.E.2d 550 (1993)
250 Ill. App.3d 303, 188 Ill.Dec. 925
September 1, 1993
Written Opinion
INSTRUCTIONS:
Use the following outline to compose your case analysis of the court’s written opinion. Your case analysis should be written in your own words, do not copy and paste from the opinion. You can use limited quotations but they should be marked with quotes and not comprise more than 20% of your case analysis.
Note: There are two theories of recovery, claims by Plaintiff, in this particular case. Make sure you address both theories when discussing the issues, holdings and reasoning in this opinion.
FORMAT:
Facts
Provide one or two short paragraphs in your own words
Issue
Identify the first legal issue/claim/theory of recovery in the form of a question
Identify the second legal issue/claim/theory of recovery in the form of a question
Holding
Identify the court’s holding in one sentence for the first issue
Identify the court’s holding in one sentence for the second issue
Reasoning
Explain in two paragraphs the rationale or reasoning for the court’s holding relative to the first issue
Explain in two paragraphs the rationale or reasoning for the court’s holding relative to the second issue
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion: One judge concurs, agrees with the other judges, but also dissents, disagrees with the other judges
Identify which holding they agree with and which one they do not
Explain in one paragraph their rationale for disagreeing
Requirements: 2 pages