The Hindu religion requires all devotees to always act with utmost honesty. Therefore, based on this perspective, acting with honesty and integrity in all situations is essential. The ethica
writing project and need the explanation and answer to help me learn.
Requirements: max
Final Project Name:
Part I My Framework
A. My Decision-Making Philosophy
When faced with a decision, I think about it from a Hindu religious perspective. Hinduism greatly emphasizes Dharma, which refers to living in a way that is ethical, just, and in accordance with one’s duty or role in life. Therefore, my decision-making process involves considering the ethical issues and identifying all the morally significant beings involved.
B. The Framework
As a Hindu, I follow a path of righteousness and morality in all my decisions. Therefore, I consider the ethical issues and the impact they might have on all the morally significant beings involved in the situation.
Identify the ethical issue:
Question: what do I do if I find a lost wallet on the streets?
Solution: The Hindu religion requires all devotees to always act with utmost honesty. Therefore, based on this perspective, acting with honesty and integrity in all situations is essential. The ethical issue in this scenario would be whether to keep the wallet or return it to its rightful owner.
Identify all the morally significant beings:
Question: who are the morally significant beings in this situation?
Solution: As a Hindu, all living beings have moral significance and should be treated respectfully and kindly. Therefore, in any decision-making process, I consider its impact on all the stakeholders involved, including my family, friends, colleagues, society, and the environment. In this case, the morally significant beings in this scenario are me, the person who lost the wallet, and any potential witnesses or bystanders who may be affected by my decision.
Gather all relevant information and assess the situation:
Question: which information is relevant in assessing the situation?
Solution: In this scenario, I would first examine the wallet’s contents to determine if there is any identification or contact information. If there is, I will contact the owner immediately to return the wallet. If there is no identifying information, I suggest turning the wallet into the local police station or to the lost and found office.
Considering the potential consequence of each option:
Question: What are the potential consequences of the options?
Solution: Keeping the wallet could lead to feelings of guilt and moral conflict, while returning it could provide a sense of peace and fulfilment. Keeping the wallet could also result in negative karma while returning it would be seen as a good deed and result in positive karma. However, returning the wallet may involve some inconvenience or potential risks (e.g., meeting with a stranger), while keeping it may offer some financial gain or convenience. It is important to weigh these consequences carefully and determine the best action.
Decide and take action:
Question: Whats the best decision? Which action will I take?
Solution: Based on the information gathered and the potential consequences considered, I would return the wallet to its rightful owner. I would do this by contacting the owner directly or turning the wallet into the local police station or lost and found. Taking action promptly and with integrity is important to ensure that the wallet is returned to its owner as soon as possible.
Conclusion
As a Hindu, I believe in following a path of righteousness and morality in all my decisions, which includes acting with honesty and integrity. My decision-making process framework involves considering the ethical issues and identifying all the morally significant beings involved. Also, by gathering all relevant information and assessing the situation, considering the potential consequences of each option, and ultimately deciding and taking action, I strive to make ethical decisions that align with my values and beliefs.
Part II Code of Ethics
Preamble
I am an international junior student at DePaul University. I was pursuing my undergrade in the field of Computer Science. I took transfer at DePaul University last quarto from The University of Illinois at Chicago.
Principles
I will not spread fake news. paired with Kant here
To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical.
Kants 1st and 2nd formulations
Kants 1st formulation of his categorical imperative
(Birsch, 2014; Kant, 2002, 1981; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020)
Principle: I will not ?.
Inverse of the principle: I will
Maxim: Whenever I am in a situation where ? I will.
Universalized maxim: Whenever anyone ?..
Argument:
Conclusion:
Kants 2nd formulation of his categorical imperative
(Birsch, 2014; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020)
Principle: I will not ?.
Inverse of the principle: I will ?.
Argument:
Conclusion:
ccc
Conclusion using Kants 1 & 2 formulations:
Duties:
The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical.
I will not text and drive paired with act & Rawls here
To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical.
Act utilitarian (Bentham, 2022; Birsch, 2014; HubPages Inc., 2003; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020)
Principle:
Inverse of the principle:
Units:
Scale:
Stakeholders:
1st Stakeholder remember to delete the red prompts
Benefits
Benefit #1:
The intensity, or magnitude
The duration, or how long the experience lasts:
The certainty, or probability it will happen:
The propinquity, or how close the experience is in space and time:
The fecundity, or its ability to produce more experiences of the same kind:
The purity, or extent to which pleasure is not diluted by pain:
The extent, or number of people involved:
As a result of the above argument, the impact (weight) of my being able to respond to people in real-time = ?…
Costs
Cost #1:
The intensity, or magnitude
The duration, or how long the experience lasts:
The certainty, or probability it will happen:
The propinquity, or how close the experience is in space and time:
The fecundity, or its ability to produce more experiences of the same kind:
The purity, or extent to which pleasure is not diluted by pain:
The extent, or number of people involved:
As a result of the above argument, the impact (weight) of my sustaining serious injury/death due to an accident I cause while texting and driving = ?…?
Stakeholder #2
Benefits
Costs
Cost #1:
The intensity, or magnitude
The duration, or how long the experience lasts:
The certainty, or probability it will happen:
The propinquity, or how close the experience is in space and time:
The fecundity, or its ability to produce more experiences of the same kind:
The purity, or extent to which pleasure is not diluted by pain:
The extent, or number of people involved:
As a result of the above argument, the impact (weight) of my ?.. = ?…?
Conclusion:
The net costs + net benefits = c1 + b1 + ?.. =
Rawlss Theory of Justice (Birsch, 2014; Lulis, 2017; Rawlss, 1971; Quinn, 2020)
Principle: …
Inverse of the principle: …
Each person may claim a fully adequate number of basic rights and liberties, so long as these claims are consistent with everyone else having a claim to the same rights and liberties.
Argument:
…
Any social and economic inequalities must
Be associated with positions that everyone has a fair and equal opportunity to achieve
Be to the greatest benefit of the least-advantaged members of society (the difference principle)
The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical.
I will not download copyrighted material from the Internet without permission.
you paired with rule here
To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical.
Rule utilitarian
(Bentham, 2022; Birsch, 2014; HubPages Inc., 2003; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020)
Principle: …
Inverse of the principle: …
Rule: …
Universalized rule: …
Stakeholders in the large:
… … …
Argument:
…
Conclusion:
…
The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical.
I will not cyber bully paired with social contract here
To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical.
Social contract
(Birsch, 2014; Friend, 2004; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020)
Principle: …
Inverse of the principle: …
The stakeholders and their rights:
Me
??
Argument & Conclusion:
…
The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical.
I will take computer sciences cources to improve my compyuting skills paired with virtue ethics here
Virtue ethics
(Aristotle, 2022; Birsch, 2014; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020)
Principle: …
Type of virtue: …
Argument and conclusion: …
I will not dox.with moral rights here
To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical.
Moral rights (Birsch, 2014; Lulis, 2017)
To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical.
Principle: …
Inverse of the principle: …
… …
Argument (were relevant duty, or duties, fulfilled? Were rights violated?):
…
Conclusion:
The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical.
I will not use someone elses streaming service paired with your framework here
My framework:
To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical.
Principle: …
Inverse of the principle: …
The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical.
References
Aristotle. Nicomachean ethics. The Internet Classics Archive by Daniel C. Stevenson, Web Atomics. Trans. W. D. Ross. Accessed January 2022.
Bentham, J. Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Some Texts from Early Modern Philosophy. Peter Millican and Amyas Merivale. Annotated by Jonathan Bennett. Accessed January 2022.
Birsch, D. (2014) Introduction to ethical theories, a procedural approach. IL:Waveland Press, Inc.
Friend, C. (2004). Social contract theory. (10 March 2013) Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from
HubPages Inc. (2003). Different types of modern utilitarianism. Retrieved from
Kant, I. (1981). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals with on a supposed right to lie because of philanthropic concerns, 3rd ed. (James W. Ellington Trans.). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. (Original work published 1785).
Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. (Allen W. Wood, Edited and Trans.). New Haven and London:Yale University Press. (Original work published 1785).
Lulis, E. (2017). CTA example: applying the procedures. [Class handout]. School of Computing, DePaul University, Chicago, IL.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, by John Rawls, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Quinn, M. J. (2020) Ethics for the Information Age, 8th edition. NY:Pearson/Addison Wesley.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
