You are expected to discuss how an analyst would have tackled the original crime problem. Referencing the crime analysis process (collection, collation etc.) will be critical to explain how

you are expected to discuss how an analyst would have tackled the original crime problem. Referencing the crime analysis process (collection, collation etc.) will be critical to explain how the pattern was known and where you would have received or requested information from. You should, in cases where a crime trend was misidentified, or not detected early, explain what mechanisms or typologies about the crime (or police process) failed to invoke a connection or link.
Your discussion should also include the mechanisms on how you intend to disseminate the information to commanders. This may include a crime map, victimology, crime type analysis, bulletins, or any other crime analysis technique you see fit to visualize the issue. Finally, if you have chosen a crime where it was later identified that the police did not initially detect the trend, a discussion should be warranted about what went wrong. This may include absence or analysis, tunnel vision, lack of evidence or any other processes that inhibited the crime from detection.
You will disseminate the tactical information from your research to determine what information you gathered about the pattern and typology of crime.
Robert Pickton is serial killer, write about him.