What would you argue is the major difference between originality that is required for copyright versus novelty for patentability? How would someone looking to protect their intellectual prop

Based on the example from the textbook; stating an invention may be unpatentable if a skilled worker would have found it obvious to try the course that led to to a new molecule in medicine; do you believe it to be fair for someone to have tried a clearly new method of research, and not be able to patent their work? Given that if it was an obvious method, should it not have been created prior?
What would you argue is the major difference between originality that is required for copyright versus novelty for patentability? How would someone looking to protect their intellectual property choose to file for either a patent, copyright, or both?
What would you argue are the moral dilemmas in patentable objects that are deemed useful, but simultaneously are harmful to a marginal group of people? For example, cleaning product fumes or microwaves, cancer meds that greatly affect quality of life.
In an event you want to raise money to help fund your research, would you have to file an application for a patent before starting said funding to protect the invention you are looking to protect? Or would you have insufficient information to file for a patent? Would your answer change if you were filing a patent outside of Canada?
Insulin recently lost a large majority of its patent protection in 2015. Do you believe established companies, in their rush to formulate new, non-native insulin and an effort to obtain new patents prevents availability of drugs like insulin? Is it keeping the costs high due to the slight variation in formula and being awarded new patents?
Inventions do not have to be completely new in order to be patentable. What is considered an improvement that would allow for patentability? For example, headphones have been around for a long period of time, but Apple has made new headphones and patented them.
With the rapidly increasing amount of patent applications, the approval time of patents has considerably increased in duration. How does an individual protect their patent during the period of time it takes to approve if it may take over a year?
Is there an overlap between financial documents relevant to commercial success under obviousness with those relevant to calculate damages? Is commercial success a good measure of obviousness?
When a creator goes to file for a patent, are they able to file for multiple patents on a single invention to provide for utmost protection?

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.