The plaintiff was seen by a physician for a blocked tear duct. During the treatment, an instrument brushed her cornea with resulting abrasions. Following the incident, the plaintiff’s daught

“a”
“150 words”
The plaintiff was seen by a physician for a blocked tear duct. During the treatment, an instrument brushed her cornea with resulting abrasions. Following the incident, the plaintiff’s daughter, who was a nurse, requested permission to review the physician’s records. After seeing the records, the plaintiff filed against the physician. At the trial, the daughter testified that her mother’s records, which she had seen in the physician’s office, had been materially altered by the time they were admitted into evidence. It was also noted that a visit that the patient made after the accident was not documented in the record. Should the court presume from this testimony that there was negligence?
Write a responses summary of >150 words explaining, in detail, your response,