The Panel found that as Indonesia was “free to impose any amount of duty it deems appropriate” on these unbound products, the specific duty challenged in this case “did not suspend, withdraw

The Panel found that as Indonesia was “free to impose any amount of duty it deems appropriate” on these unbound products, the specific duty challenged in this case “did not suspend, withdraw, or modify Indonesia’s obligations under Article II of the GATT 1994” express in full the arguments of the Appellate Body in rejecting the concurring views of the parties (whether the measure was a safeguard); and compare the said argument with other WTO Cases on Safeguards. (Look for cases on Safeguards at WTO website and mention their reference in full (and the exact paragraphs in those cases being cited).