Synthesize the holdings in these five cases to formulate the relevant factors in determining whether a defendant was “in immediate flight.” Case 1: The murder was committed by Alfred one day

The question is whether at the time one defendant committed a murder, the other
defendant was “in immediate flight” from a robbery they had both committed, and therefore was
also chargeable with the murder under the state felony murder law. The murder was of a third
felon of their group.
Synthesize the holdings in these five cases to formulate the relevant factors in
determining whether a defendant was “in immediate flight.”
Case 1:
The murder was committed by Alfred one day after Alfred and Bob robbed a store
together. Bob was in another county 50 miles away.
Held: Bob was not in immediate flight from the robbery.
Case 2:
The murder was committed by Delia as she and Gene were being chased by the police
moments after they had robbed a store.
Held: Gene was in immediate flight from the robbery.
Case 3:
The murder was committed by Adam one hour after he and Keith had robbed a store.
Keith had gone to buy the two of them bus tickets to Atlantic City. They had agreed to
divide the proceeds when Adam joined Keith at the bus terminal.
Held: Keith was in immediate flight from the robbery.
Case 4:
The murder was committed by Barbara two hours after she and Dan had committed a
robbery. One hour after the robbery, Dan had surrendered to the police and was in police
custody.
Held: Dan was not in immediate flight from the robbery.
Case 5:
The murder was committed by George at 10 p.m. At 5 p.m. George and Bert had divided
the proceeds from the robbery that they had committed at 4 p.m.
Held: Bert was not in immediate flight from the robbery