From my point of view, I think the new educational material should be authoritative because negotiating with them will make them believe they have options to keep to the instructions. But be

Please comment or ask questions if you agree or disagree with the following two forums below:
1. From my point of view, I think the new educational material should be authoritative because negotiating with them will make them believe they have options to keep to the instructions. But being authoritative will make them know it is a serious instruction or prescription to follow. For example, if a doctor tells you to take 2 pills of a drug a day to help you cure your illness totally you will want to follow the instruction.
Some barriers could be a cultural barrier, language, education level, inability to access medical facilities, inability to access traditional or local food, and physical inactivity.
The pros of involving them to find a solution are that you will get to know what their challenges are for not following the instructions. There will be a close relationship between you and them which will make them trust you. They will feel comfortable approaching you with their problems in the future.
The cons are there will be little or no communication between the patient and you. You won’t be able to find the roots of their problem.
Other options are to help them develop personal skills by educating them on several consequences of not following good health nutrition values. Make sure their environment is supportive by restricting them from junk and unhealthy food. Enable partnerships with individuals to help to improve their health.
2. I personally think this would be considered a more authoritative approach because we are instructing a strict diet that should be followed. The authoritative approach makes sure that clients are obeying the rules and that they understand they need to take the program seriously. Practitioners know what is best for their clients and they are looking for their best interests in helping prevent diseases. However, I do believe that some negotiation should take place to ensure the clients understand the instructions and have access to all of the requirements. With both aspects being taken into consideration, we can make sure the program is working to the best of its abilities.
Possible barriers could include income distribution, language barriers, access to transportation, and access to medical services.
Pros: Religion and cultural values would be taken into consideration, and clients can express their concerns or questions requiring regarding the program
Cons: Clients may not understand or accept the extent of their disease and downplay how they are feeling so conclusions in the study may not be accurate.

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.