Dan Reisel studies the biology of change, including our ability to rewire our own brains. And he asks a big question: Instead of warehousing these criminals, shouldn’t we be using what we kn

Dan Reisel studies the biology of change, including our ability to rewire our own brains. And he asks a big question: Instead of warehousing these criminals, shouldn’t we be using what we know about the brain to help them rehabilitate? Put another way: If the brain can grow new neural pathways after an injury … could we help the brain re-grow morality? Dan is a neuroscientist, and as such his research is evidenced based. For your refelction, consider his research and how it may help some people commiting crime. This is part of the “nature” vs “nurture” – being on the nature side. We are not neuroscientist, however what of his research can make sence and what value might there be for society?