Recall that your Student Skills Inventory is like a passport in which you collect stamps whenever you enter a new country. In the Skills Lab Intensive, every time you demonstr

330 pts

1. Excellent

Effectively demonstrated all required skills on the Student Skills Inventory. If an additional assignment(s) required to attain full demonstration of skills, assignment(s) demonstrate a high level of critical thinking and clearly indicates that student can apply knowledge of social work skills. Attended all sessions or made up any missed sessions, up to two excused absences. … Always arrived on time to sessions and stayed the entire session. Fully participated and contributed more than their share. Received a 5 on both areas assessed below.

330 pts

2. Good

Effectively demonstrated all required skills on the Student Skills Inventory. … If an additional assignment(s) m required to attain full demonstration of skills, assignment(s) demonstrate a competent level of critical thinking and demonstrates that student can adequately apply knowledge of social work skills. … Attended all sessions or made up any missed sessions, up to two excused absences. … Student almost always arrived on time to sessions and stayed the entire session. … Student fully participated and significantly contributed. … Received a 4 or better on both areas assessed below.

330 pts

3. Fair

Effectively demonstrated all required skills on the Student Skills Inventory. If an additional assignment(s) required to attain full demonstration of skills, assignment(s) demonstrate an acceptable level of critical thinking and demonstrates an acceptable ability to apply knowledge of social work skills. Attended all sessions or made up any missed sessions, up to two excused absences. Student arrived on time to sessions and stayed the entire session or for the majority of sessions. Student adequately participated and contributed to their group. Received a 3 or better on both areas assessed below. OR Received a 2 in one of areas assessed above AND completed additional requirements as determined by instructor and Director of Skills Lab to demonstrate readiness for Field Placement.

0 pts

4. Poor

0 pts

5. Poor

5 pts

Excellent

Student exceeded expectations in professional interactions through all modes of communication. Student respectfully interacted with faculty, staff, and colleagues, both online and face to face, in all interactions. Student demonstrated excellent ability to take another perspective and seek understanding. Student exceeded expectations of participation and active engagement in group discussions. Student’s attention was fully present in the classroom at all times (e.g., student did not work on other items or engage in activities not related to the immediate session).

4 pts

Good

Student met expectations in professional interactions through all modes of communication. Student respectfully interacted with faculty, staff, and colleagues, both online and face to face, in most interactions. Student demonstrated ability to take another perspective and seek understanding. Student actively participated by engaging in group discussions. Student’s attention was present in the classroom (e.g., student did not work on other items or engage in activities not related to the immediate session).

3.5 pts

Fair

Student met minimal level of expectations in professional interactions through all modes of communication. Student respectfully interacted with faculty, staff, and colleagues, both online and face to face, in most interactions. Student demonstrated minimal ability to take another perspective and seek understanding. Student participated at the minimal expected level in group discussions. Student’s attention was mostly present in the classroom (e.g., student may have occasionally been distracted by other activities not related to the immediate session).

2 pts

Poor

Student did not meet expectations in professional interactions through all modes of communication. Student inconsistently interacted with faculty, staff, and colleagues in both online and/or face-to-face interactions. Student demonstrated limited ability to take another perspective and seek understanding. Student insufficiently participated in group discussions. Student’s attention was not focused in the classroom (e.g., student may have worked on other items or engaged in activities not related to the immediate session a significant portion of the time).

1 pts

Poor

Student did not meet expectations in professional interactions through any modes of communication. Student did not respectfully interact with faculty, staff, and colleagues in either online or face-to-face interactions. Student demonstrated no ability to take another perspective or seek understanding. Student did not participate in group discussions. Student’s attention was not present in the classroom (e.g., student consistently worked on other items or engaged in activities not related to the immediate session). Student behaved or interacted in ways that would be harmful toward clients in a social work setting.

5 pts

Excellent

Student expertly used faculty supervision and consultation to guide professional judgment and behavior to help resolve any issues that emerge when working with classmates.

4 pts

Good

Student sufficiently used faculty supervision and consultation to guide professional judgment and behavior to help resolve any issues that emerge when working with classmates.

3.5 pts

Fair

Student minimally used faculty supervision and consultation to guide professional judgment and behavior to help resolve any issues that emerge when working with classmates.

2 pts

Poor

Student somewhat used faculty supervision and consultation to guide professional judgment and behavior but struggled to resolve issues that emerge when working with classmates.

1 pts

Poor

Student failed to use faculty supervision and consultation to guide professional judgment and behavior. Significant issues emerged when working with classmates.