Why does Skinner say that the terms “cause and effect” are no longer appropriate in science? How does Skinner replace the old “cause and effect” terminology? Explain why Skinner

If a researcher found, in a correlational study, that an increase in one factor resulted in an equal increase of the same magnitude in another factor the correlation, or r would be:
0.5
0
1.0
-1.0
The ability of science to rule out random chance is most strongly tied to:
correlation coefficients
correlational designs
validity
reliability
a main limitation of a correlational study is:
you can’t do correlational studies with children
we can’t know if the relationship between two variables is positive or negative
the direction of causality is not known
it doesn’t tell us about the relationship between variables
I am conducting a study where I wanna test the effectiveness of a bullying prevention video. I randomly split the class into two groups in both groups do the same activities, however only one group is shown the bullying prevention video. This is an example of what type of study design?
controllable study
experimental study
forced group study
real life study
the greatest weakness of a cross-sectional study is:
that there is significant participant loss
that it cannot assess change in one person overtime
that it requires much time and is expensive
that it does not focus on a single topic of development