As someone with a background in psychology, you (Darius) have been chosen to be the foreman for this jury. It is your task to organize the jury’s thoughts on whether the defendant

Dr. Gloat was a well-established psychologist with a very prestigious practice. For many years, he followed every ethical rule. But around age 50, something happened. Suddenly his hunger for money, cars, and a new lifestyle increased. He mentioneddiscreetly of coursethat he would be willing to sign the insurance forms and file under his license for therapeutic services conducted by beginning therapists who have not achieved the ability to file independently for a fee. His office mate, Dr. Shocked, discovered this behavior. Ethically, how should Dr. Shocked respond?