Read the materials in Learning Activities. Then consider your teaching practice (formally or informally, eg. teaching assistant, babysitting, etc.) and pinpoint two areas
Read the materials in Learning Activities. Then consider your teaching practice (formally or informally, eg. teaching assistant, babysitting, etc.) and pinpoint two areas of strength (“glows”) and two areas in need of refinement (“grows”) related to your instruction and delivery skills. In other words, what do you do well, and what do you need to improve as related to your teaching? What do you want to know and be able to do from a pedagogical lens by the end of this course? (see Touro GSE Practicum Observation Rubric Domains 1, 2, and 3).
You will have opportunities to demonstrate your growth and development throughout this course. You will also have opportunities to refer to these responses and revise them as you grow throughout the semester . This professional pedagogical response will also be used in your final practicum course.
In your response,
- be thoughtful and thorough
- use academic language
- state your ideas clearly and provide rationale for your responses by referencing previous course work, the Module 1 readings and the following Touro GSE CLOs
Your response should be limited to no more than 500 words double spaced, typed (two pages).
Learning Activities
- Read: White paper – Characteristics of High Quality Teachers. Stronge, J. H. (2018, February 28). Qualities of effective teachers, 3rd edition Download Qualities of effective teachers, 3rd edition. ASCD. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED582452 Links to an external site.
- Read: Inside the Black Box Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box Links to an external site.– WEA education blog. Retrieved from https://weaeducation.typepad.co.uk/files/blackbox-1.pdf
- Read: Characteristics of High Quality Educators: Walker, R. J. (2008). Twelve characteristics of an effective teacher – ed. eric.ed.gov. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ815372.pdf Links to an external site.
- Read: Danielson Critical Attributes (Domain 2 and Domain 3) Links to an external site.
- Read: NYSED Culturally Responsive Sustaining Education framework Culturally responsive-sustaining education. New York State Education Department. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.nysed.gov/crsDownload http://www.nysed.gov/crs
- Read: Touro Candidate Learning Outcomes – TC GSE Candidate Learning Outcomes.docxDownload TC GSE Candidate Learning Outcomes.docx
- Complete: Professional Pedagogical Response
videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4isSHf3SBuQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgNODvvsgxM
Teaching Rubric for Formal Observations of Student Lessons (Practicum)
Student Teaching Observation Rubric: Domain 1 (1 of 5)
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation |
Unsatisfactory: Unacceptable |
Basic: Novice Student Teacher |
Proficient: Effective Student Teacher |
Distinguished: Advanced Student Teacher |
1a: Demonstrates Content Knowledge (including NYS Learning Standards) |
Student teacher displays little understanding of content/standards and makes no connection to other disciplines. |
Student teacher has basic understanding of content/standards and makes some attempt to connect with other disciplines. |
Student teacher has a solid understanding of content/standards and extends connections to other disciplines. |
Student teacher has an extensive understanding of content/standards and makes meaningful connections to other disciplines. |
1b: Demonstrates Knowledge of Pedagogy |
Student teacher displays little understanding of pedagogical content and does not address students’ misconceptions. |
Student teacher displays partial understanding of pedagogical content and makes some attempt to address students’ misconceptions. |
Student teacher has solid knowledge of pedagogical content and anticipates most student misconceptions. |
Student teacher has a comprehensive understanding of pedagogical content knowledge and consistently anticipates student misconceptions. |
1c: Plans with Knowledge of Student Background, Skills, and Interests to Differentiate Instruction |
Student teacher does not use knowledge about student background, skills, and interests to plan lessons that differentiate instruction |
Student teacher attempts to use student information to plan lessons that differentiate instruction |
Student teacher demonstrates knowledge of students and uses this information to plan appropriate lessons and differentiate instruction. |
Student teacher demonstrates thorough knowledge of students and consistently uses this information to plan engaging lessons that differentiate instruction. |
1d: Selects Appropriate Instructional Goals/ Addresses NYS Learning Standards |
Student teacher’s instructional goals are inappropriate for student learning level and do not address standards. |
Student teacher’s instructional goals are appropriate some of the time. Standards are inconsistently addressed. |
Student teacher’s instructional goals are consistently appropriate. Standards are consistently incorporated. |
Student teacher’s instructional goals reflect high level learning and consistently incorporate standards. |
1e: Demonstrates Knowledge of Teaching Resources (including technology) |
Student teacher is unaware of teaching resources available for whole class, small group, and individualized instruction (e.g., texts, visuals, and Internet). |
Student teacher uses teaching resources sparingly (e.g., texts, visuals, and Internet). |
Student teacher consistently makes use of teaching resources (e.g., texts, visuals, and Internet). |
Student teacher makes use of a variety of teaching resources (e.g., texts, visuals, and Internet) and seeks out new technologies. |
1f: Designs Coherent Instruction |
Student teacher designs lessons/units that do not support instructional goals and do not contain a logical structure. |
Student teacher’s lessons/units are sometimes logical and some elements support instructional goals. |
Student teacher lesson/unit design contains a logical structure and elements support instructional goals. |
Student teacher’s lesson/unit design is highly coherent and all elements support instructional goals. |
1g: Assesses Student Learning |
Student teacher’s design lacks a plan for appropriate assessment. |
Student teacher’s assessment plan will yield little useful information about student understanding and shows little alignment with instructional goals. |
Student teacher’s assessment plan will yield useful information about student understanding and shows alignment with instructional goals. |
Student teacher’s assessment plan will yield quality information about student understanding of stated goals, and student teacher consistently uses information to plan future lessons. |
This rubric draws on guidelines from the work on student teaching evaluation rubrics from educators such as Charlotte Danielson and Robert Marzano as well as materials from the New York State Education Department Teacher Certification Exams and New York State United Teachers.
Teaching Rubric for Formal Observations of Student Lessons (Practicum)
Student Teaching Observation Rubric: Domain 2 (2 of 5)
Domain 2: Classroom Environment |
Unsatisfactory: Unacceptable |
Basic: Novice Student Teacher |
Proficient: Effective Student Teacher |
Distinguished: Advanced Student Teacher |
2a: Creates an Environment of Respect and Rapport |
Classroom interactions are negative or inappropriate and characterized by conflict. |
Classroom interactions are usually appropriate and sensitive to the cultural and developmental differences among students. |
Classroom interactions are consistently appropriate and sensitive to the cultural and developmental differences among students. |
Classroom interactions reflect genuine warmth and caring and are respectful of the cultural and developmental differences among students. |
2b: Establishes High Expectations |
Student teacher has low expectations for student achievement. |
Student teacher may have high expectations, but students do not clearly understand what is expected of them. |
Student teacher has high expectations for student achievement; students frequently achieve at the expected level and often take pride in their work. |
Student teacher has high expectations for student achievement; students consistently meet those expectations and take pride in their work. |
2c: Manages Classroom Procedures |
Instructional time is lost because classroom procedures are either nonexistent or inefficient. |
Classroom procedures function unevenly or inconsistently. |
Classroom procedures function smoothly most of the time. |
Classroom procedures function smoothly because of teacher and student commitment. |
2d: Manages Student Behavior |
Standards of classroom behavior are not communicated and student teacher does not respond to student misbehavior. |
Standards of classroom behavior are applied inconsistently and student teacher responses are not always successful. |
Student teacher has established clear standards of behavior and responds appropriately. |
Student teacher has established clear standards of behavior and is proactive in preventing student misbehavior. |
2e: Uses Physical Environment to Support Learning Activities |
Physical environment is unsafe/inaccessible and does not support learning. |
Classroom environment is safe, but furniture arrangement presents accessibility issues and may not support learning. |
Student teacher’s classroom is safe, accessible, and supports learning. |
Student teacher makes it a priority to use physical environment to support learning. |
Teaching Rubric for Formal Observations of Student Lessons (Practicum)
Student Teaching Observation Rubric: Domain 3 (3 of 5)
Domain 3: Instruction |
Unsatisfactory: Unacceptable |
Basic: Novice Student Teacher |
Proficient: Effective Student Teacher |
Distinguished: Advanced Student Teacher |
3a: Communicates Clearly and accurately |
Student teacher’s oral and written communication is unclear, contains errors, or is inappropriate. |
Student teacher’s oral and written communication is appropriate, generally free from error, but may require further explanation. |
Student teacher’s oral and written communication is clear, appropriate, and accurate. |
Student teacher’s oral and written communication is clear and expressive, and consistently accurate. |
3b: Uses High-level, Open ended Questions |
Student teacher uses closed, low level questions that allow for little student discussion. |
Student teacher uses high level, open-ended questions, and discussion techniques unevenly, which leads to moderate student discussion. |
Student teacher uses high level, open-ended questions and discussion techniques, which leads to full student participation. |
Student teacher encourages student inquiry by modeling and directly teaching how to create and use high level, open-ended questions to facilitate discussion. |
3c: Engages Students in Learning |
Student teacher does not intellectually engage students as a result of inappropriate activities/poor lesson structure and implementation. |
Student teacher attempts but is minimally successful at intellectually engaging students because of inappropriate activities/ uneven lesson structure and implementation. |
Student teacher is generally successful in intellectually engaging students. Activities are appropriate; lesson structure and implementation are usually successful. |
Student teacher is successful in intellectually engaging students because of appropriate activities and effective lesson structure and implementation. |
3d: Paces Instruction and Provides Closure |
Student teacher’s pacing is not consistent with the lesson’s goals, and s/he does not provide closure. |
Student teacher’s pacing is uneven, and s/he does not always provide closure. |
Student teacher’s pacing is on target and s/he brings closure to the lesson. |
Student teacher consistently paces instruction and effectively provides closure to each lesson. |
3e: Provides Appropriate Feedback to Students |
Student teacher’s feedback is negative and not timely. No attempt is made to make use of it in the teaching/learning process. |
Student teacher’s feedback is of uneven quality, inconsistently timed and minimally incorporated into the teaching/learning process. |
Student teacher’s feedback is timely and of consistently good quality, and incorporated into the teaching/learning process. |
Student teacher’s feedback is timely, consistent, of high quality and students make use of it in their learning. |
3f: Demonstrates Flexibility and Responsiveness |
Student teacher proceeds with planned lesson in spite of evidence of student misunderstanding and assumes no responsibility for students’ failure to understand. |
Student teacher makes some attempt to modify lessons according to student needs, interests, questions, and begins to assume responsibility for students’ failure to understand. |
Student teacher successfully modifies lessons to meet student needs, interests, and questions most of the time and assumes responsibility for students’ failure to understand. |
Student teacher successfully modifies lessons to meet student needs, interests, questions and ensures that lesson objectives are met. |
Teaching Rubric for Formal Observations of Student Lessons (Practicum)
Student Teaching Observation Rubric: Domain 4 (4 of 5)
Domain 4: Professional Responsibility |
Unsatisfactory: Unacceptable Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers. Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper? Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials. We write plagiarism Free Content Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties. Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions. All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions |