Please read and check the article down below. check grammars and awkward sentences. change them after please, Thanks, The media article by Emily Chung titled “Neanderthals’ Paleo
Please read and check the article down below.
check grammars and awkward sentences.
change them after please,
Thanks,
The media article by Emily Chung titled “Neanderthals’ Paleo Diet Included a Surprising Kind of Meat” also demonstrates various characteristics that this is a secondary source. However, this article presents more factual data that demonstrates a more accurate reflection of the research. Although it is still a secondary source, this article is more expert and academic than the one above. The author uses scientific language that is appropriate for the scholarly article and research that was conducted, which is the first reason I believe this article accurately reflects the research. Such predators also leave distinctive gnaw marks on the bones and swallow some of them, which end up partially digested, the author writes. The author uses information from a variety of sources, which is the second reason I think this article accurately reflects the research. She uses on reliable sources of scientists who have all carried out comparable studies. For instance, she uses the research of anthropologists April Nowell, an assistant professor at the University of Victoria, and Eugene Morin, an associate professor at Trent University in Peterborough, as well as Julien Riel-Salvatore, an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Montreal. The author’s use of resources from a wide range of geographic regions is the last reason I think this article accurately reflects the research. She uses on studies conducted in Southern France, the Mediterranean, Lazaret Cave, Spain, and other parts of Europe. This demonstrates that there were no biases because the author used a wide range of reliable sources to support her point. As a whole, this article accurately reflects the research that was done because the author used scientific terminology, a wide range of sources, and research from various geographical locations.
The Jessica Nyzink-authored media article “Humans Were Hunting Small Game Earlier Than Thought” demonstrates a number of characteristics that make me think it is a secondary source. The first thing that struck me about this article was the abundance of grammatical mistakes, strange sentence constructions, and slang. As an illustration, the author says, “Hunting small game might’ve been done solo,” which I don’t think would be appropriate for a scholarly article because it’s shorthand slang. Additionally, I observed that the author of this article did not acknowledge the data collectors until the very end of the piece. We are unable to locate any of her sources because she does not cite anything when she finally gives the author credit. I discovered that the article was seriously lacking in important details. The author did include some information, such as the fact that “fast game started about 40,000 years ago, during the upper Paleolithic period,” and the possibility that “Rabbit hunts might have involved different degrees of social prestige and co-operation than those that targeted larger animals,” but she still omitted crucial details. She omitted to mention that because the effort to catch them gives such little reward, it was uncommon for those animals to be consumed. Additionally, she left out the results from various geographic regions, which would be viewed as biased because she omitted some of the details. It is difficult to believe the facts she has included because she also omitted to mention how or where the researchers obtained their information. Numerous changes could be made to this article. Overall, the article’s grammar, citations, and factual information, along with the author’s biases, demonstrate that it is not a true reflection of the research.
The research “New Evidence Of Broader Diets For Archaic Homo Populations In The Northwestern Mediterranean” explores the behaviour patterns and traits of the Neanderthals in the Lower and Middle Paleolithic. This research explored the hypothesis that, contrary to what was previously believed, eating small animals like rabbits was more widespread before the Upper Paleolithic period. This research suggests that humans had a wider variety of foods in their diets than previously thought, even though these small animals were more difficult to catch and had a smaller energy net gain due to their size. Leporid remains were examined, hunting implements were discovered, and harvesting locations were noticed, proving this theory. First, scientists made a comparison between the distribution of leproid remains and the area where people were supposed to have settled. According to researchers, “Considering the evidence above with the spatial overlap of leporid and ungulate remains and stone tools at the site indicate that humans were the main accumulators of leporids at this location.” These factors came together to support this claim. According to this research, Neanderthals were more adaptable and versatile than previously believed. Second, neanderthals were once thought to be completely unique from other creatures, but this study shows that they were actually not that different from early modern humans, as they claim. Overall, our studies suggest that broader diet breadths persisted in various northwest Mediterranean regions. The tools that the Neanderthals were using, which are very similar to the tools that modern humans would use, were discovered by the researchers. This leporid remains may have been used for a variety of purposes based on the numerous cut marks that can be seen on the meat-bearing components. Finally, the Neanderthals consumed a wide variety of meats in their diets because there were sites that researchers observed where they would have been harvested. “The relationship observed between the proportion of infant rabbits and anthropic damage in our data suggests that this hunting technique was infrequently practiced. Nonetheless, the breeding season for rabbits is typically shorter than conventional wisdom suggests, which implies that mass harvesting might have been practiced at these sites”. Overall the research conducted observing the Neanderthals showed that their diets were broader than ever expected. This allows researchers to analyze the behaviours, characteristics and history of the Neanderthals. From leporids remains being examined, hunting tools were found and harvesting sites were observed it was proven the Neanderthals consumed small animals such as rabbits, much more frequently before the Upper Paleolithic era than researchers originally thought.
When there are so many sources available, it can be very challenging to research specific subjects and gather information. Different types of sources, such as primary and secondary sources, each offer unique information. Raw, first-person evidence can be found in primary sources. Information from secondary sources is information that has been heard before and information that has been discussed by others. Although secondary sources tend to be more reliable, good research will include both primary and secondary sources. The language used in the articles is one of the key distinctions between primary and secondary sources. The language used in primary sources is frequently extremely formal and expert. Secondary sources frequently use informal language that includes slang and short-form words. For instance, whereas secondary sources might suggest “when the research was conducted,” primary sources might use phrases like “here are the findings.” Secondary sources typically use much simpler language because they are an account of research or an opinion. The authors of the sources are the second distinction between primary and secondary sources. In primary sources, the author is frequently a scientist, researcher, or specialist in the subject matter. The authors of secondary sources typically consist of journalists or regular people who lack subject-matter expertise. Facts and opinions in articles typically differ due to this difference in authors. Citations and publications are the final distinctions between primary and secondary sources. The citations are always explicit and simple to access in primary sources. A reliable source, like an academic institution, is always used to publish the article. Secondary sources sometimes have citations that are difficult to read or completely absent. Additionally, they are frequently released by unreliable news organizations or journals. Primary sources generally have higher credibility than secondary sources. Secondary sources can occasionally be risky to use because they are less reliable than primary sources. The use of secondary sources is riskier for a variety of reasons. First off, it’s possible that the article’s opinions are biased in favour of the subject. As a result, you risk having views that are biased in favour of a specific secondary source. Second, you might decide to conduct less research if you believe the problem has already been thoroughly examined. When conducting your research, this could be extremely risky because you’ll be giving out information that might be false. Last but not least, a secondary source might not be entirely accurate or might have taken a primary source quotation out of context. You will be repeating untrue facts if you are unable to recognize this. Since secondary sources are recounted events rather than first-hand accounts, they can be much riskier to use overall. There are a few different things you can look for to tell if the secondary source you are using is trustworthy. Check the website that is posting this information’s domain first. If the source comes from a social media or news website, you might want to think about looking elsewhere. The next step is to do some research on the author and attempt to find other works on which they have collaborated. The author may not be providing accurate information if they lack any scientific training or a track record of publishing reliable research. Last but not least, you should look for biases as you read to see if there are any. The article is unreliable if the author is trying to make a point while ignoring the opposing viewpoint. We must look out for these traits when reading the articles because secondary sources can generally be unreliable. When conducting research and studying at university the following year, being able to distinguish between primary and secondary sources throughout this course will help me advance my education. With the ability to recognize reliable sources and separate facts from opinions, I can now succeed in my future endeavors. Overall, I will benefit from knowing the distinction between primary and secondary sources as I continue my education and pursue a career.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
