Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member.?Substantive responses
Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member. Substantive responses offer new info and add to the conversation. *Responses are substantive by incorporating literature to support statements. Use one literature resource for your weekly response and in at least one of your replies to a classmate or faculty. You can use the same source of literature each time or different sources. Check rubric for more details.
Due Thursday
Review Nurse Professional Liability Exposures: 2015 Claim Report Update to understand some of the most common legal allegations. As you read, think about ways to mitigate the risks listed in the report.
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
- What struck you most about the report or the allegations discussed?
- Select 1 example or illustration from 1 of the claims categories and explain what could have been done to mitigate the risk that led to the claim.
- How does this affect you or your work place?
FYI – I work in oncology /infusion where we infuse chemo and these meds are life threatening meds in case you need to add
Nurse Professional Liability Exposures: 2015 Claim Report Update
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FROM CNA AND NURSES SERVICE ORGANIZATION
PART 1 Nurse Professional Liability Exposures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Database .and .Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Data .Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
Analysis .of .claims .by .licensure .type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
Analysis .of .severity .by .year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Nurse .closed .claims .with .expense .payments .only . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Analysis .of .severity .by .nurse .specialty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
Analysis .of .severity .by .location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Analysis .of .Severity .by .Allegation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Allegation .by .category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Analysis .of .Allegation .Sub-categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
Allegations .related .to .assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
Allegations .related .to .monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Allegations .related .to .treatment .and .care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Claim Scenario: Delay in Implementing Provider Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24
Allegations .related .to .medication .administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
Claim Scenario: Medication Error Resulting in Death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
Allegations .related .to .patients’ .rights, .patient .abuse .and .professional .conduct . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Analysis .of .Severity .by .Injury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
Analysis .of .fatal .injuries .by .underlying .cause .of .death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31
Analysis .of .severity .by .cause .of .death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31
Analysis .of .obstetrics-related .injuries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33
Analysis .of .severity .by .disability .outcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34
Analysis .of .director .of .nursing .(DON) .closed .claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35
Claims .related .to .agency .nurses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36
Claim Scenario: Successful Defense of a Nurse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37
Licensed .practical/licensed .vocational .nurse .closed .claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38
Summary .of .Closed .Claims .with .a .Minimum .Indemnity .Payment .of .$1 .Million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39
Risk .Control .Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
Patient .safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
Assessment .and .monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42
Treatment .and .care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43
Chain .of .command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43
Scope .of .practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44
Risk .Control .Self-assessment .Checklist .for .Nurses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45
Claim .Tips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Everyday .practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48
Once .you .become .aware .of .a .claim .or .potential .claim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48
PART 2 Nurses Service Organization’s Analysis of License Protection Paid Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50
License .Defense .Paid .Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50
Analysis .of .claims .by .licensure .type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50
Analysis .of .claims .by .location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51
Analysis .of .claims .by .allegation .class . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52
Average .payment .by .allegation .class . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52
Claims .by .Allegation .Class .Sub-Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53
Allegations .related .to .sub-category .of .professional .conduct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53
Allegations .related .to .sub-category .of .patients’ .rights .and .patient .abuse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54
Allegations .related .to .sub-category .of .improper .treatment .and .care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55
Allegations .related .to .sub-category .of .medication .administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56
Licensing .Board .Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57
Comparison .of .2011 .and .2015 .distribution .of .licensing .board .actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57
Explanation .of .Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58
General .Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59
PART 3 Highlights from Nurses Service Organization’s 2015 Qualitative Nurse Work Profile Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61
Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61
Summary .of .Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63
Topic .1: .Respondent .Demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64
Nursing .licensure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64
Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64
Pre-licensure .nursing .program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65
Origin .of .education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65
Additional .certifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66
Years .in .practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67
Topic .2: .Current .Practice .Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68
Technology .and .rapid .access .to .information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68
Technology .and .patient .records .access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68
Managing .technology .and .time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68
Technology .and .information .verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69
Usage .of .electronic .patient .notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69
Access .to .evidence-based .data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69
Staff .development .opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70
Employment .practice .periodic .checks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71
Topic .3: .About .the .Claim .Submitted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72
Working .situation .at .the .time .of .the .incident . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72
Employment .status .at .the .time .of .the .incident . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72
Years .in .practice .at .the .time .of .the .incident . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73
Magnet™ .designation .at .the .time .of .the .incident . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73
Substance .abuse .procedure .in .place .at .the .time .of .the .incident . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74
Tenure .in .position .at .the .time .of .the .incident . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74
Topic .4: .About .the .Facility .Where .the .Incident .Occurred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .75
Technology .in .the .workplace .at .the .time .of .the .incident . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .75
How .long .were .you .using .technology .at .the .time .of .the .incident? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .77
Perceived .patient .benefit .of .technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79
Rapid .response .team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79
PART 1 Nurse Professional Liability Exposures
CNA Five-year Closed Claims Analysis (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2014) and Risk Control Self-assessment for Nurses
PART 1 CNA AND NSO Nurse 2015 Claim Report Update 6
Introduction For .over .30 .years, .CNA .and .our .business .partners .at .Nurses .Service .Organization .(NSO) .have .been .
committed .to .helping .nurses .insure .themselves .against .loss .by .providing .specialized .insurance .
coverage .and .working .to .enhance .their .risk .awareness . .Our .joint .professional .program .is .the .nation’s .
largest .underwriter .of .professional .liability .insurance .for .individual .nursing .professionals, .with .more .
than .550,000 .policies .in .force . .CNA/NSO-insured .nurses .provide .healthcare .in .an .increasingly .
broad .array .of .locations .and .specialties, .including .hospitals, .aging .services .facilities, .outpatient .and .
ambulatory .centers, .practitioner .offices, .schools, .community .and .retail .health .settings, .spas .and .
aesthetic/cosmetic .centers .
Purpose In .collaboration .with .NSO, .we .are .pleased .to .present .our .third .report .on .nurses’ .risk .exposures, .
which .examines .CNA .nurse .claims .that .closed .between .January .1, .2010 .and .December .31, .2014 . .
Our .goal .is .to .identify .liability .patterns .and .trends .in .order .to .help .nurses .understand .their .areas .of .
greatest .vulnerability, .in .order .to .take .appropriate .action .to .protect .patients .from .harm .and .reduce .
the .risk .of .potential .litigation .
When .possible, .this .report .compares .CNA/NSO .nurse .professional .liability .closed .claims .that .occurred .
between .January .1, .2006 .and .December .31, .2010 .with .the .corresponding .set .of .closed .claims .dating .
from .January .1, .2010 .through .December .31, .2014 . .The .two .groups .of .closed .claims .are .referred .to .
as .the .2011 .and .2015 .closed .claim .reports, .respectively . .This .comparison .provides .a .broader .historical .
perspective .on .claim .characteristics, .including .trends .in .exposures .and .severity .
The .report .also .summarizes .individual .claims .with .settlements .or .judgment .awards .equal .to .or .
greater .than .$1 .million . .Detailed .case .studies .illustrate .failure .to .comply .with .professional .standards .
of .care, .resulting .in .patient .injury .and .consequent .claims .of .negligence . .Finally, .risk .control .recom-
mendations .and .a .self-assessment .checklist .are .included .to .assist .nurses .in .reviewing .their .custom .
and .practice .in .relation .to .the .risks .identified .in .the .report .
PART 1 CNA AND NSO Nurse 2015 Claim Report Update 7
Database and Methodology The .report .includes .only .those .CNA .professional .liability .closed .claims .that:
– Involved .a .registered .nurse .(RN), .licensed .practical .nurse .(LPN) . .
or .licensed .vocational .nurse .(LVN) .
– Closed .between .January .1, .2010 .and .December .31, .2014 . .
(although .they .may .have .been .reported .earlier) .
– Resulted .in .an .indemnity .payment .of .$10,000 .or .greater .
These .inclusion .criteria .were .applied .to .10,639 .reported .adverse .incidents .and .claims .that .closed .
during .the .designated .time .period . .The .final .primary .database .comprises .549 .nurse .closed .claims, .
which .were .subsequently .reviewed .and .analyzed .
In .addition .to .the .primary .dataset .of .claims .that .closed .from .January .1, .2010 .to .December .31, .2014 .(the .
2015 .dataset), .a .dataset .consisting .of .claims .that .closed .between .January .1, .2006 .and .December .31, .
2010 .(the .2011 .dataset) .was .utilized .in .this .report .to .draw .comparisons .and .identify .trends . .Since .
both .of .these .datasets .include .closed .claims .from .2010, .it .is .important .to .note .that .the .two .datasets .
are .not .fully .independent . .Nevertheless, .by .comparing .the .two .datasets .we .can .see .how .the .average .
paid .indemnity .amounts .associated .with .various .claim .characteristics .are .changing .over .time .and .
better .identify .patterns .in .nurse .claim .activity .and .litigation . .The .2011 .dataset .includes .516 .professional .
liability .claims, .while .the .2015 .dataset .includes .549 .professional .liability .claims .
As .this .report .has .unique .data .inclusion .criteria, .readers .should .exercise .caution .about .comparing .
the .findings .with .similar .publications .from .other .sources .
Scope The .focus .of .the .analysis .is .on .the .severity .of .nurse .closed .claims .that .satisfied .the .inclusion .criteria .
described .above . .Claim .characteristics .examined .within .the .report .include .location .of .the .event, .
nurse .specialty, .type .of .allegation, .and .harm .or .injury .
Unless .specifically .noted, .the .tables .and .charts .in .Part .I .of .this .report .include .both .RN .and .LPN .nurses .
closed .claims . .See .Figure .20 .on .page 38 .for .a .comparative .analysis .of .RN .and .LPN/LVN .closed .claims .
PART 1 CNA AND NSO Nurse 2015 Claim Report Update 8
Terms For .purposes .of .this report only, .please .refer .to .the .terms .and .explanations .below:
2011 claim report .– .A .reference .to .the .prior .CNA .study, .titled .“Understanding .Nurse .Liability, .
2006-2010: .A .Three-part .Approach,” .www.cna.com/healthcare .
Agency nurse .– .Any .RN .or .LPN/LVN .who .provides .nursing .services .as .an .independent .contractor .
or .as .an .employee .of .a .staffing .or .placement .service .
Aging services .– .Specialized .facilities .or .organizations .that .provide .healthcare .to .a .senior .population . .
Aging .services .facilities, .which .also .may .be .referred .to .as .long .term .care, .include .but .are .not .limited .
to .nursing .homes, .assisted .living .centers .and .independent .living .facilities .
Average total incurred .– .Indemnity .plus .expense .costs .paid .by .CNA, .divided .by .the .number .of .
closed .claims .
Expense payment .– .Monies .paid .in .the .investigation, .management .and/or .defense .of .a .claim .
Incurred payment .– .The .costs .or .financial .obligations, .including .indemnity .and .expenses, .resulting .
from .the .resolution .of .a .claim .
Indemnity payment .– .Monies .paid .on .behalf .of .an .insured .nurse .in .the .settlement .or .judgment . .
of .a .claim .
Practitioner .– .A .licensed .independent .healthcare .provider .such .as .a .physician, .dentist, .advanced .
practice .nurse .or .physician .assistant .
Severity .– .The .average .indemnity .amount .of .CNA .nurse .closed .claims .included .within .the .dataset .
Limitations The .data .analysis .within .this .report .is .subject .to .the .following .limitations .and .conditions:
– The .database .includes .only .closed .claims .against .nurses .insured .by .CNA .through .the .NSO .
program, .which .does .not .necessarily .represent .the .entire .spectrum .of .nurse .activities .and .nurse .
closed .claims .
– Noted .indemnity .payments .are .only .those .paid .by .CNA .on .behalf .of .its .insured .nurses .through .
the .NSO .program .and .do .not .reflect .additional .amounts .paid .by .employers, .other .insurers .or .
other .parties .in .the .form .of .direct .or .insurance .payments .
– The .process .of .resolving .a .professional .liability .claim .may .take .many .years . .Therefore, .claims .
included .in .this .report .may .have .arisen .from .an .event .that .occurred .prior .to .2010, .yet .closed .
during .the .period .of .the .report .
PART 1 CNA AND NSO Nurse 2015 Claim Report Update 9
Data Analysis
Analysis of claims by licensure type – Of .the .549 .nurse .closed .claims, .88 .5 .percent .involve .RNs .and .11 .5 .percent .involve .LPNs/LVNs . .
These .percentages .reflect .the .overall .proportion .of .CNA/NSO-insured .nurses . .While .the .distri- .
bution .of .licensure .types .within .the .CNA/NSO .book .of .business .varies .somewhat .over .time, .the .
current .ratio .of .our .in .force .business .represents .89 .percent .RNs .to .11 .percent .LPNs/LVNs .
– Claims .asserted .against .LPNs/LVNs .resulted .in .a .58 .percent .increase .in .average .total .incurred,
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.