Disease risk from BMI and waist girth

Form 23.2 Body Mass Index Lab Results Name: Date Score: Gender: m Initials: MA Age (y): 25 Height (cm): 187 Weight (kg): 115.0 Height (m) = 187 cm / 100 m Height Waist girth (cm) = 42.5 Body mass index (BMI) = kg / ( ) m2 = kg.m-2 Weight Ht Ht Category for BMI (Table 23.4) NHLBI Classification of BMI (Table 23.2) Disease risk from BMI and waist girth (Table 23.2) Evaluation: Gender: M Initials: DB Age (y): 27 Height (cm): 185 Weight (kg): 111.0 Height (m) = 185 cm / 100 = m Height Waist girth (cm) = 13 Body mass index (BMI) = kg / ( ) m2 = kg.m-2 Weight Ht Ht Category for BMI (Table 23.4) NHLBI Classification of BMI (Table 23.2) Disease risk from BMI and waist girth (Table 23.2) Evaluation:

Form 24.2 Girths and Ratios Lab Results Name: Date Score Gender: M Initials: MA Age (y): 25 Height (cm): 187 Weight (kg): 115.0 Neck girth (to closest 0.5 cm) T1 44.0 T2 43.0 T3 44.0 Median cm Upper abdom girth (for W:H ratio) T1 113.0 T2 112.0 T3 113.0 Median cm Midabdominal girth (for W/Ht ratio)) T1 117.0 T2 115.0 T3 117. Median cm Hip girth (for W:H ratio) T1 107.5 T2 106.0 T3 107. Median cm 2-Girth Body Comp Circumference value (CV) = cm Midabdon Neck DB = 1.0324 + [0. 15456 * – [0. 19077* g.ml-1 Log 10 (Ht) Log10 (CV) % Fat = (495 / DB – 450 = % % Fat = (Table 24.2) Category (Notes: Table 24) Waist-to-Hip Ratio (W:H) cm cm= Upper abdom Hip W:H Ratio Risk for waist girth (Table 24.4) Risk for W:H ratio (Table 24.6) Waist-to-Height Ratio (W/Ht) cm cm = Midabdom Height W/Ht Ratio Evaluation of W/Ht ratio: <0.50 Lower risk 3 0.50 Higher risk of disease Gender: F Initials: JA Age (y): 23 Height (cm): 162 Weight (kg): 75.0 Neck girth (to closest 0.5 cm) T1 36.0 T2 36.0 T3 36.0 Median cm Upper abdom girth (for W:H ratio) T1 37.0 T2 85.0 T3 87.0 Median cm Midabdominal girth (for W/Ht ratio)) T 92.0 T2 92.0 T3 10.0 Median cm Hip girth (for W:H ratio) T1 106.0 T2 107.0 T3 107.0 Median m 3-Girth Body Comp Circumference value (CV) = cm Upper abo Hip Neck DB = 1.29579 + [0.221 162.000 [0.35004* g.ml-1 Log10 (Ht) Log 10 (CV) % Fat = (495 / DB – 450 = % % Fat = (Table 24.3) Category (Notes: Table 24) Waist-to-Hip Ratio (W:H) cm cm = Upper abdom Hip W:H Ratio Risk for waist girth (Table 24.4) Risk for W:H ratio Table 24.6) ist-to-Height Ratio (W/Ht) Cm Cm= Midabdom Height W/Ht Ratio Evaluation of W/Ht ratio: <0.50 Lower risk 3 0.50 Higher risk of disease

Form 25.2 Skinfolds Lab Results Name: Date: Score: Gender: M Initials: MA Age (y): 25 Height (cm): 187 Weight (kg): 115.0 T1 T2 T3 Median Triceps (closest 0.5 mm) 24.0 23.0 24.0 mm Subscapular skinfold 21.0 21.0 20.0 mm mm Chest skinfold * 19.0 18.0 18.0 mm Sum of 3 skinfolds Axilla skinfold 17.0 17.0 17.0 mm Suprailium skinfold 19.0 18.0 19.0 mm mm Abdomen skinfold 7.0 17.0 16.0 mm Sum of 7 skinfolds Thigh skinfold 20.0 20.0 19.0 mm 3-Site DB = 1. 10938 – [0.0008267 * 1+ [0.0000016* 2 ] – [0.0002574* SF sum SF sum 2 Age % Fat = (495 / ) – 450 = Table 25.2 : Category: Table 25.4 DE 7-Site DB = 1.112 – [ 0.00043499* + [0.00000055 2] – [0.00028826* SF sum SF sum 2 Age % Fat = (495 / ) – 450 = Table 25.3 : 1% Category: Table 25.4 DB Evaluation Gender: F Initials: aa Age (y): 21 Height (cm): 166 Weight (kg): 56.0 T1 T2 T3 Median Triceps * (closest 0.5 mm) 14.0 15.0 13.0 14.0 mm Subscapular skinfold 15.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 mm 45.0 mm Chest skinfold 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 mm * Sum of 3 skinfolds Axilla skinfold 10.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 mm Suprailium skinfold * 10.0 9.0 10.0 0.0 mm 86.0 mm Abdomen skinfold 15.0 17.0 15.0 15.0 mm Sum of 7 skinfolds Thigh skinfold 22.0 20.0 21.0 21.0 mm 3-Site DB = 1.0994921 – [0.0009929* 1 + [0.0000023* 2 ] – [0.0001392 SF sum SF sum 2 Age % Fat = (495 / ) – 450 = Table 25.2 % Category Table 25.4 DB 7-Site DB = 1.097 – [ 0.00046971 + [0.00000056 * 2] – [0.00012828 * SF sum SF sum 2 Age % Fat = (495 / ) – 450 = Table 25.3 : Category: Table 25.4 DB Evaluation