Nick orally agreed to sell his only vineyard to Hari for $100,000 cash.
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →Nick orally agreed to sell his only vineyard to Hari for $100,000 cash. There was no written contract, but Hari gave Nick a check for $1,000, on which was written, “Earnest money toward sale of Nick’s vineyard in Paso Robles, California for $100,000.” Nick did not deposit the check and instead held it in his files. If Nick refuses to complete the agreement, can Hari successfully sue for specific performance?
Select one:a. No, the agreement is for the sale of land and it is oral, not written as required by the Statute of Frauds.b. Yes, the agreement is enforceable under the Part Performance doctrine.c. No, the agreement does not specifically identify the property, other than “Nick’s vineyard.”d. Yes, the agreement is enforceable under the Statute of Frauds.
NO EXPLANATION NEEDED SINCE I AM RUNNING OUT OF TIME. tHANKS
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds