Is it a judge’s duty to enforce the positive laws of his/her jurisdiction regardless of the judge’s opinion about the validity of those laws

Is it a judge’s duty to enforce the positive laws of his/her jurisdiction regardless of the judge’s opinion about the validity of those laws – where the laws a) violate clear international standards of human rights (crimes against humanity) or b) are otherwise unjust – contrary to some constitutional provision of morally repugnant?

2. To what extent should judges be personally responsible for presiding over trials and entering judgments that constitute crimes against humanity?

3. Do the answers to 1 & 2 change if you consider prosecutors rather than judges?

4. Do efforts to limit the bad effects of reprehensible laws absolve a judge from personal/moral or criminal responsibility? Why or why not?

5.     Specifically regarding the film, do you think the extent of Nazi atrocities or Janning’s admission that he was going to find Feldenstein guilty and order his death regardless of the evidence was the major deciding factor in Judge Haywood’s decision to find Janning guilty? Explain your answer.

answer all above questions 

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.