In deciding the case of R. v. Keegstra, Justice McLachlin (speaking for the dissent) disputed the rational connection of the Criminal Code s. 319(2) – the anti-hate speech statute – to the purported purpose of the law.

In deciding the case of R. v. Keegstra, Justice McLachlin (speaking for the dissent) disputed the rational connection of the Criminal Code s. 319(2) – the anti-hate speech statute – to the purported purpose of the law. 

a) What did the Supreme Court determine was the objective of the law? 

b) McLachlin offered three reasons for her belief that this law did not actually help achieve that end. What were those three reasons? (Name each one, and briefly explain what her reasoning was in each instance.)

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.