Think of an example of a behavior or structure that is currently adaptive but that might become nonadaptive, or even maladaptive, if the environment were to change.
Watch the TEDTalk by Harvey Fineberg titled, “Are we ready for neo evolution?” , found at https://www.ted.com/talks/harvey_fineberg_are_we_ready_for_neo_evolution (Links to an external site.)
Now answer the following questions and respond in your reaction assignment (be sure to look at the grading rubric in order to earn as many points as you can):
– What did you think of the video and the things Harvey Fineburg talked about? Explain your thoughts on how this video relates to the field of biopsychology, and include a description of evolution.
– Think of an example of a behavior or structure that is currently adaptive but that might become nonadaptive, or even maladaptive, if the environment were to change. Describe your example and your reasoning.
– In your writing, be sure to identify ways in which modern advances have changed our understanding of genetic processes and identify the the ethical challenges and solutions associated with these advances.
Consult Discussion Criteria and the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. It is recommended that you write your post in a document first. Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to make your initial post, click on “Reply.” Then copy/paste the text into the message field, and click “Post Reply.” This is a “post first” discussion forum. You must submit your initial post before you can view other students’ posts.
To respond to a peer, click “Reply” beneath her or his post and continue as with an initial post.
Remember to properly cite and reference your sources in APA format!
Evaluation
This discussion will be graded using the discussion board rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 35% of your final course grade.
Keep the following points in mind when working in the discussion forums:
Postings should display originality in thought and insightful synthesis.
Postings should demonstrate understanding of key concepts.
Responses should be original and stimulate discussion.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 2 Discussion
Your brain is more than a bag of chemicals
Discussions are an opportunity for you to practice clearly and effectively communicating your ideas, interact with and respectfully challenge your peers, and support your writing with examples and scholarly resources as appropriate.
It’s time to delve a little deeper into how drugs are used to influence neurotransmission. Watch the TEDTalk to get your brain kickstarted on thinking about important concepts within this module, and then answer the questions. Remember this is due before your discussions, on Wednesday of each week. The purpose of this is to help scaffold your learning so that you are introduced to module topics in the first assignment and then complete the learning quiz to help you become more familiar with the language and concepts. Successfully completing this activity demonstrates achievement of Module Outcome 4. Watch the TED Talk by David Anderson titled, “Your brain is more than a bag of chemicals” [Video file: 15:25 mins].
Now answer the following questions and respond in your reaction assignment (be sure to look at the grading rubric in order to earn as many points as you can):
– What did you learn that surprised you or was new? What kinds of questions did this video trigger for you?
– Describe your understanding of how are drugs used to influence neurotransmission. In your explanation, give at least one specific example.
– Why is it important for biopsychologists to understand neural conduction and synaptic transmission? Is it important for all psychologists to have such knowledge?
Consult Discussion Criteria and the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. This is a “post first” discussion forum. You must submit your initial post before you can view other students’ posts.
To respond to a peer, click “Reply” beneath her or his post and continue as with an initial post.
Remember to properly cite and reference your sources in APA format!
Evaluation
This discussion will be graded using the discussion board rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 35% of your final course grade.
Keep the following points in mind when working in the discussion forums:
Postings should display originality in thought and insightful synthesis.
Postings should demonstrate understanding of key concepts.
Responses should be original and stimulate discussion.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 3 Discussion
A monkey that controls a robot with its thoughts. No, really.
Discussions are an opportunity for you to practice clearly and effectively communicating your ideas, interact with and respectfully challenge your peers, and support your writing with examples and scholarly resources as appropriate.
As described in your text, there has recently been a flurry of technological advances involving brain-computer interfaces (i.e., direct communication between a computer and the brain – usually via an array of electrodes placed in the brain), such as those discussed in the Chapter 8 case study of “Belle: The Monkey That Controlled a Robot With Her Mind”.
For this assignment, you’ll watch a TED Talk that explores the use of robots to gain motor function, and think about how this applies to our topics this week.
Successful completion of this activity meets Module Outcome 4.
Watch the TED Talk by Miguel Nicolelis – A monkey that controls a robot with its thoughts. No, really. (Links to an external site.) [Video file: 14:55 mins]. Retrieved from: https://www.ted.com/talks/miguel_nicolelis_a_monkey_that_controls_a_robot_with_its_thoughts_no_really (Links to an external site.)
Now, thoughtfully answer the following questions, thinking about the current views regarding primary motor cortex function and the evidence upon which it’s based.
What were your thoughts about the TED Talk? What did you learn that surprised or interested you the most?
What sorts of brain-computer interfaces do you envision for the future? What types of ethical problems might arise due to this and how can they be solved? As part of your answer, explain the role of different sensorimotor structures and functions.
BCI.jpg
Testing a BCI (Brain-Computer Interface) developed by Health and Quality of life Unit researchers, FIK technology research program for aged and disabled people. Fatronik-Tecnalia, Research and Technology Center, Donostia, Basque Country, Spain. [Photo]. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. http://quest.eb.com.vlib.excelsior.edu/search/164_3262431/
Consult Discussion Criteria and the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. This is a “post first” discussion forum. You must submit your initial post before you can view other students’ posts.
Evaluation
This discussion will be graded using the discussion board rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 35% of your final course grade.
Keep the following points in mind when working in the discussion forums:
Postings should display originality in thought and insightful synthesis.
Postings should demonstrate understanding of key concepts.
Responses should be original and stimulate discussion.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 4 Discussion
You can grow new brain cells
Discussions are an opportunity for you to practice clearly and effectively communicating your ideas, interact with and respectfully challenge your peers, and support your writing with examples and scholarly resources.
It’s time to get introduced to the concepts of the nervous system and neuroplasticity. Neurogenesis occurs during development and can also occur in response to environmental stimuli. Unfortunately, neurogenesis in the central nervous system of humans is limited in its ability to recover after damage. Recent research indicates that more extensive neurogenesis may be possible in the central nervous system.
Watch the TEDTalk to introduce yourself to important concepts within this module, and then post your reaction. Remember this is due before your discussions, on Wednesday of each week. The purpose of this is to help scaffold your learning so that you are introduced to module topics in the first assignment and then complete the learning quiz to help you become more familiar with the language and concepts. You’ll then be fully prepared to participate in a meaningful way within the discussion for the week, and be able to show off the things you’ve learned in your assignment due every Sunday.
Successfully completing this activity demonstrates achievement of Module Outcomes 3 and 4.
Watch TEDTalk: Sandrine Thuret – You can grow new brain cells. (Links to an external site.) [Video file, 11:04 mins] Retrieved from: https://www.ted.com/talks/sandrine_thuret_you_can_grow_new_brain_cells_here_s_how (Links to an external site.)
Now, answer the following:
Identify something you learned about the brain and neurons that you can use in your daily life to understand or work with others.
Given that brain damage seems to induce adult neurogenesis, what adaptive role, if any, might these new cells be playing? In your answer, describe the concept of “cognitive reserve” and the potential role of adult neurogenesis in recovery following CNS damage.
Based on your writing above, what would you say to someone who tells you that physical activity protects one from the development of Alzheimer’s Disease. What would be your response to that person? Use examples from your life or current events and/or scholarly evidence to support your argument.
Consult Discussion Criteria and the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. This is a “post first” discussion forum. You must submit your initial post before you can view other students’ posts.
Remember to properly cite and reference your sources in APA format!
Evaluation
This discussion will be graded using the discussion board rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 35% of your final course grade.
Keep the following points in mind when working in the discussion forums:
Postings should display originality in thought and insightful synthesis.
Postings should demonstrate understanding of key concepts.
Responses should be original and stimulate discussion.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 5 Discussion
Why school should start later for teens
Sleep… Who needs an introduction? Watch the TEDTalk to get interested in these important concepts within this module, and then answer the questions.
Successfully completing this activity demonstrates achievement of Module Outcomes 2 and 3.
Watch TED Talk Wendy Troxel – Why school should start later for teens (Links to an external site.) [Video file, 10:33 mins]. Retrieved from: https://www.ted.com/talks/wendy_troxel_why_school_should_start_later_for_teens/transcript (Links to an external site.)
For your assignment, share your thoughts about what Wendy claims in the TED Talk. Do you agree? Disagree? Tell us why.
Describe the major effects of sleep deprivation in humans. Share an example of a time when this has happened to you. In your writing, describe why deficits in vigilance and motivation lead to cognitive deficits? Give an example as part of your discussion answer.
If you were a sleep researcher studying sleep in various organisms, how would you define sleep? As part of your definition, identify the four conclusions that have resulted from the comparative analysis of sleep.
sleep deprivation eeg.jpg
EEG Readings from a Sleep Deprivation Study. [Photograph]. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. http://quest.eb.com.vlib.excelsior.edu/search/139_1902361/
sleep study.jpg
Sleep study. This study aims to determine the cause of temporary pauses in breathing (or sleep apnea) during sleep. Electrical activity in the heart, brain, facial muscles and neck is measured.. [Photograph]. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. http://quest.eb.com.vlib.excelsior.edu/search/181_763779/
Consult Discussion Criteria and the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. This is a “post first” discussion forum. You must submit your initial post before you can view other students’ posts.
Remember to properly cite and reference your sources in APA format!
Evaluation
This discussion will be graded using the discussion board rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 35% of your final course grade.
Keep the following points in mind when working in the discussion forums:
Postings should display originality in thought and insightful synthesis.
Postings should demonstrate understanding of key concepts.
Responses should be original and stimulate discussion.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 6 Discussion
Everything you think you know about addiction is wrong
This TED Talk introduces the module by trying to reframe the conversation about addiction. Addiction issues encompass many types of behaviors, not just the use of substances.
Successfully completing this activity demonstrates achievement of Module Outcomes 3 and 4.
Watch TED Talk Johann Hari – Everything you think you know about addiction is wrong (Links to an external site.). [Video file, 14:42 mins]. https://www.ted.com/talks/johann_hari_everything_you_think_you_know_about_addiction_is_wrong (Links to an external site.)
In your reaction, answer the following:
What are your thoughts on what Johann said in this TED Talk? Do you agree? Disagree? Explain your reasons.
While your textbook focuses on addictions to substances, consider all addictive behaviors. What do you think the withdrawal reaction might be when one suddenly stops taking an antidepressant medication or engaging in an addictive behavior after many years. Explain your decision and include your explanation of what it means to be physically dependent on a drug (as part of this, you should describe the withdrawal process). To illustrate your writing, provide an example from your experiences.
In his presentation, Johann mentions policies surrounding drugs. If you could change those policies related to how we treat drug-addicted individuals, what would be the first thing you would change? In your answer, be sure to describe methods for measuring the rewarding effects of drugs and why the information you’re sharing is important for your policy recommendations.
Consult Discussion Criteria and the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. This is a “post first” discussion forum. You must submit your initial post before you can view other students’ posts.
Remember to properly cite and reference your sources in APA format!
Evaluation
This discussion will be graded using the discussion board rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 35% of your final course grade.
Keep the following points in mind when working in the discussion forums:
Postings should display originality in thought and insightful synthesis.
Postings should demonstrate understanding of key concepts.
Responses should be original and stimulate discussion.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 7 Discussion
A powerful stroke of insight
Learning, memory, lateralization, amnesia, smart drugs… These are all terms used throughout this module. This TED Talk focuses on cerebral lateralization and what it means for our every day life. This TED Talk is from 2008, but just because it’s not “new” doesn’t mean it’s not powerful and informative.
It wasn’t long ago that scientists believed that the brain functioned as a whole to complete every mental and psychical task. Now science understands brain lateralization in terms of the two halves of the human brain are not exactly alike. It is perplexing to realize that as one side of the brain may be working on understanding language the other side might be working on a math problem. This also means that each hemisphere has functional specializations and that some function with neural mechanisms that are localized primarily in one half of the brain. Let’s examine this further. By the end of this activity, you will be able to comment on an article on lateralization. In addition, you will address ways lateralization impact our language development.
Watch the TED Talk Jill Bolte Taylor – A powerful stroke of insight (Links to an external site.). [Vidoe file, 18:19 mins]. Retrieved from: https://www.ted.com/talks/jill_bolte_taylor_s_powerful_stroke_of_insight (Links to an external site.)
React to the video by commenting on the following:
What did this TED Talk make you think about?
Prior to watching this TED Talk, what were your preconceptions about cerebral lateralization of function? What did it mean for you?
In your writing, explain what does lateralized means, and what effect lateralization has on behavior. Give some examples from daily life.
Consult Discussion Criteria and the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. This is a “post first” discussion forum. You must submit your initial post before you can view other students’ posts.
Remember to properly cite and reference your sources in APA format!
Evaluation
This discussion will be graded using the discussion board rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 35% of your final course grade.
Keep the following points in mind when working in the discussion forums:
Postings should display originality in thought and insightful synthesis.
Postings should demonstrate understanding of key concepts.
Responses should be original and stimulate discussion.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 8 Discussion
What doctors don’t know about the drugs they prescribe
This is our last module, and our final TED Talk. In this video, some fundamental issues are brought up about how we provide scientific evidence in the medical community. Because we’re discussing mental health and psychotropic medications, this includes us.
Successfully completing this activity demonstrates achievement of Module Outcomes 1 and 2.
Watch TED Talk Ben Goldacre – What doctors don’t know about the drugs they prescribe. (Links to an external site.) [Video file, 13:29] Retrieved from: https://www.ted.com/talks/ben_goldacre_what_doctors_don_t_know_about_the_drugs_they_prescribe (Links to an external site.)
What’s your reaction to this TED Talk? Were you surprised by anything, or not? Write about why you were or weren’t surprised.
In your webtext, Zivin (discussed in Chapter 18) suggests that clinical trials can be trustworthy, fast, or cheap – but that in any one trial, only two of the three are possible? After watching this TED Talk, what do you think he means?
Finally, describe the scientific reasoning that should be used when determining if drugs are effective in treating psychiatric disorders.
Consult Discussion Criteria and the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. This is a “post first” discussion forum. You must submit your initial post before you can view other students’ posts.
Remember to properly cite and reference your sources in APA format!
Evaluation
This discussion will be graded using the discussion board rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 35% of your final course grade.
Keep the following points in mind when working in the discussion forums:
Postings should display originality in thought and insightful synthesis.
Postings should demonstrate understanding of key concepts.
Responses should be original and stimulate discussion.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 1 Assignment
Critical Thinking – Applying the Nature-Nurture Controversy
By this point in your college education, you are probably quite familiar with the nature-nurture controversy. In this critical thinking activity, you will create a short video explaining your perspectives about the nature-nurture controversy.
The major purpose of these final assignments in each module is to integrate the information you have learned throughout the current module and the course thus far, and to practice effective and professional communication of your ideas in various formats.
The reason you are making a video is because, as you already know, communication through only written information is not the only skill needed in today’s world. Being capable of communicating your ideas orally using professional body language and presentation skills is critical for job and career success. Creating videos will help you improve your technical and communication skills, which will be used in any career you pursue.
Successful completion of this activity meets Module Outcome 3.
M1MN_person’s_eye.jpg
Your task is to answer the two following questions in a short video:
Imagine you are a biopsychology instructor. One of your students asks you whether depression is physiological or psychological. What would you say?
Next, a student asks whether intelligence is inherited or learned… Now, you know that nature-or-nurture thinking about intelligence is sometimes used as an excuse for racial discrimination. How can the interactionist view, which has been championed in Chapter 2, be used as a basis for arguing against discriminatory practices in the workplace?
Briefly write out a script for yourself before you create the video. Scripts help you sound more focused and polished while keeping the information clear and concise. Follow the tips located here to maximize the impact of your script and video.
Canvas allows you to create video right within our LMS. Follow the directions givien in the “Technical Guidance” document, found at the beginning of our course.
Your video should be a maximum of 2 minutes long (60 seconds to answer each question posed above). Do your best to maintain your character of a professor answering questions in a classroom!
Evaluation
This assignment will be graded using the rubric displayed below. Please review this rubric prior to beginning your work. You can also access the rubric on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here module. Critical thinking assignments are worth 30% of your final course grade.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 4 Assignment
Critical Thinking – Ethical Problems and Solutions
For this activity, you will be using your biopsychological knowledge to create a two minute video that clearly and concisely communicates the identification of an ethical problem and your proposed solution.
The reason you are making a video is because, as you already know, communication through only written information is not the only skill needed in today’s world. Being capable of communicating your ideas orally using professional body language and presentation skills is critical for job and career success. Creating videos will help you improve your technical and communication skills, which will be used in any career you pursue.
Successful completion of this activity meets Module Outcome 5.
Choose one of the following options and create a 90 – 120 second oral argument, presented in a video (as your professional presence will also be evaluated):
Option 1: A politician has proposed cutting off funding to any labs that use stem-cell tissue. Using what you know about the development of the nervous system and how neuroscientists study neurodevelopment, what would you say at a public hearing about this topic?
stem cells.jpg
Stem cells, SEM. [Photography]. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. http://quest.eb.com.vlib.excelsior.edu/search/132_1245906/ (Links to an external site.)
Option 2: A person with epilepsy was brought to trial for assault. The lawyer argues that her client is not a criminal and that the assaults in question were complex partial seizures. She points out that her client takes her medication faithfully but that it does not help. The prosecution lawyer argues that the defendant has a long history of violent assault and must be locked up. What do you think the judge should do?
judge.jpg
Judge. [Photograph]. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest.
http://quest.eb.com.vlib.excelsior.edu/search/139_1899144/ (Links to an external site.)
Briefly write out a script for yourself before you create the video. Scripts help you sound more focused and polished while keeping the information clear and concise. Follow the tips located here to maximize the impact of your script and video.
Canvas allows you to create video right within our LMS. Follow the directions giving in the “Technical Guidance” document, found at the beginning of our course.
Your video should be a maximum of 2 minutes long (60 seconds to answer each question posed above). Do your best to maintain your character!
Evaluation
This draft assignment will be graded with a 100 for full participation, 50 for attempted participation, or a 0 for no submission. These critical thinking assignments, due every Sunday, are worth a total of 30% of your course grade. You will be unable to access Module 7 until you receive a score of 100 on this assignment.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 6 Assignment
Critical Thinking – Transgender Ethics
Once again, you are creating an evidence-based oral argument (supported with a clearly illustrated example). This can be a video or a voiceover presentation, student’s choice! The goal is for you to apply knowledge about biopsychology to identify ethical problems and propose a reasonable solution, and being capable of communicating your ideas orally using professional presentation skills is critical for job and career success.
Creating these products will help you improve your technical and communication skills, which will be used in any career you pursue.
Successful completion of this activity meets Module Outcome 5.
transgender balance.jpg
Transgender balance [Artwork]. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. http://quest.eb.com.vlib.excelsior.edu/search/132_1368430/
Create an oral argument, complete with properly cited and reference scholarly sources as necessary, to support your writing. The oral argument must be presented in either a video (remember, professional presence!) or a voiceover in a multimedia presentation.
Sexual attraction, gender identity, and body type are independent of each other. Knowing this, imagine someone telling you that all male-to-female transsexual persons prefer males as their sexual partners. What would your response be? Support your response with an example. Be sure to identify and address at least one ethical problem faced by individuals within transgender communities and propose a reasonable solution.
Remember you must present some scholarly evidence and an example to support your argument.
Remember to write out a script for yourself before you create the video or voiceover. Scripts help you sound more focused and polished while keeping the information clear and concise. Follow the tips located here to maximize the impact of your script and video/voiceover.
Canvas allows you to create video right within our LMS. Follow the directions giving in the “Technical Guidance” document, found at the beginning of our course.
Your presentation should be a maximum of 2 minutes long.
Evaluation
This assignment will be graded using the rubric displayed below. Please review this rubric prior to beginning your work. You can also access the rubric on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here module. Critical thinking assignments are worth 30% of your final course grade.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 7 Assignment
Revise M4A1 – Critical Thinking, Ethical Problems and Solutions
Using the feedback you received on your M4A1 assignment titled, “Critical Thinking – Ethical Problems and Solutions” revise your video presentation to improve your performance.
Successful completion of this activity meets Module Outcome 3.
This activity aligns with the career competency of oral communication.
INSTRUCTIONS:
For this assignment (due by Sunday night), you will submit your final version of the M4A1 video presentation assignment and then complete and submit a self-assessment. For maximum points in the rubric, you must incorporate feedback received from your instructor into your paper as appropriate, as well as submit your self-assessment.
Instructions for completing the Self-Assessment (also due by Sunday night, when you submit your revised paper):
For maximum points on this assignment, you must complete and submit the self-assessment in the “Assignment Comments” section of your assignment submission.
For the Self-Assessment, thoughtfully answer the following questions:
– What did you like about this assignment? What were you able to do well?
– What did you like the least about this assignment? What were the biggest challenges you experienced? Why?
– What did you learn about yourself through creating this multimedia presentation and the feedback process? Consider your strengths, interests, support needs.
– What do you wish you had spent more time on or done differently? Why?
– What part of the assignment did you do your best work on? Why?
smart drug.jpg
Modafinil capsule [Photograph]. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. http://quest.eb.com.vlib.excelsior.edu/search/132_1335435
Submission Instructions
Compose your work in a .doc or .docx file type using a word processor (such as Microsoft Word, etc.) and save it frequently to your computer. For those assignments that are not written essays and require uploading images or PowerPoint slides, please follow uploading guidelines provided by your instructor.
Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to submit your work, click “Upload Submission.” Enter the submission title and then click on “Select a file to upload.” Browse your computer, and select your file. Click “Open” and verify the correct file name has appeared next to Submission File. Click on “Continue.” Confirm submission is correct and then click on “Accept Submission & Save.”
Evaluation
This assignment will be graded using the rubric displayed below. Please review this rubric prior to beginning your work. You can also access the rubric on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here module. Critical thinking assignments are worth 30% of your final course grade.
PSY380 BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Module 8 Assignment
Critical Thinking – Most Interesting Case Study
We’re going to finish up the course by thinking about the case studies you’ve reviewed throughout the class. In your text, most chapters have multiple examples of case studies that help illustrate the different concepts we’re learning about. For our final presentation, you’re going to choose the case study you found the most interesting and present it in a voiceover presentation.
Successful completion of this activity meets Module Outcome 5.
case study.jpg
Silhouette of psychiatric patient [Photograph]. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. http://quest.eb.com.vlib.excelsior.edu/search/181_765012
Address this question: Which case study presented in the textbook was the most interesting to you, and what did you learn from it? In your multimedia presentation, include all of the following criteria.
At a minimum, your presentation will include:
– A voiceover, graphics/images, and written content;
– The name of the case study you chose;
– Your reasons for choosing it the case study;
– A summary of the case;
– The most important things you learned from the study;
– An ethical problem related to the case study AND a proposed solution for the ethical problem;
– How the case study has changed the way you think about biopsychology.
Remember, to present some scholarly evidence and examples to support your argument.
For maximum points, you must include a voiceover in your presentation. If you need assistance with this, visit the Audio Script Writing Tips and Technical Guidance: Multimedia Presentation Assignment pages.
Evaluation
This assignment will be graded using the rubric displayed below. Please review this rubric prior to beginning your work. You can also access the rubric on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here module. Critical thinking assignments are worth 30% of your final course grade.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
