The increase in smoking among teenagers and the dangers posed to ch they smoke, the City Council in Chicago, Illinois, enacted an ordinance that prohibits the us billboards within 1000 feet of a school to advertise tobacco products.

Concerned about the increase in smoking among teenagers and the dangers posed to ch they smoke, the City Council in Chicago, Illinois, enacted an ordinance that prohibits the us billboards within 1000 feet of a school to advertise tobacco products. A tobacco company f challenging the constitutionality of the regulation, The city produced evidence to show that tobacco products among teenagers has increased substantially in the last ten years, and th link between advertising and demand for tobacco products. The tobacco company produce evidence to show that, given the locations of schools, the ordinance restricts billboard adv tobacco products in roughly 90% of Chicago. How should the court rule? a, The court should invalidate the ordinance, because by restricting advertising to n Chicago’s adult population, the regulation restrains speech more than is necessa government’s interest in protecting children from the dangerous health effects b. The court should invalidate the ordinance, because the regulation does not dire government’s interest in protecting children from the dangerous health effects . The court should uphold the ordinance, because the government can ban frau misleading commercial speech. The court should uphold the ordinance, because the government has a subst protecting children from the dangerous health effects of smoking, and the or dvances that interest because children are less likely to start smoking if the vertising.