Topic of Interest: Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and the effects on Cardiac Activity in Teens Problem Statement: How does generalized anxiety disorder effect your cardiac
Topic of Interest:
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and the effects on Cardiac Activity in Teens
Problem Statement:
How does generalized anxiety disorder effect your cardiac health and how often anxiety disorders are miss diagnosed due to the similar symptoms presenting themselves?
BUSI 600
Research Proposal: Final Assignment Instructions
The purpose of the Research Proposal: Final Assignment is to ensure you appreciate the challenge of setting up an effective research plan, consider the context, research questions, sources, timeline, integrated implications, analysis, and writing required. Building a proposal will demand you work through all the research stages explored throughout the course including: clarifying the research question; designing the research; reviewing relevant scholarly literature, data collection, preparation and examination; analyzing the data; and reporting on the research.
Using the Research Proposal: Topic Assignment that has been approved, build a comprehensive research proposal on that topic.
The Research Proposal: Final Assignment should use the following outline/structure and follow the suggested quantity of content for each element:
· Title – clear, concise and well-defined to explain your research question.
· Executive Summary – short summary of 100-250 words that includes the research question, hypothesis of your research, the research methodology and findings.
· Introduction (>200 words) – provide a background or context related to your research problem. It should include the purpose, background, significance, issues, variables and hypothesis.
· Problem statement (< 100 words) – clearly state the specific problem down to something that is researchable. Present it in a thesis statement and a hypothesis. Explain the management research question hierarchy for the problem.
· Literature Review (1000-1300 words) – conduct extensive background research and support your research question with ample proof from scholarly, peer reviewed sources. credible sources and research. There is additional help on literature reviews below in the section titled Additional Help.
· Importance/Benefits of the Study (>250 words) – describe the explicit benefits
· Research Design (>400 words) – explains the phases of the research, sampling design, participants, data collection design, instruments, procedures, ethical requirements, etc.
· Nature and Form of Results (>250 words) – explain the anticipated form for the results to include the types and format of data to be presented for the expected audience.
· Budget (>150 words) – summary of costs and expenses necessary to conduct the research.
· Schedule (>150 words) – summarize the major phases, timelines, milestones and primary deliverables.
· Ethical considerations (>200 words) – must carefully consider data collection processes and participant rights.
· Implications and considerations (>200 words) – identify at least 2 implications and 2 limitations of the proposed study.
· References
Ensure the following requirements are met:
· Follow the outline, content structure and length provided in the assignment instructions
· At least 3,000 words (excluding the title page and references pages)
· Reference at least 10 scholarly (peer reviewed) research articles. For assistance on how to identify scholarly sources, refer to the Liberty University Research Portal tutorials (see Resources section).
· Use proper grammar, current APA format and submit in MS Word format.
The Research Proposal: Final Assignment does not require an abstract or Biblical integration.
Do not reuse work from any previous courses you have taken.
Paraphrasing vs. Plagiarism
Some students do not fully understand the difference between plagiarism and paraphrasing. Paraphrasing is when you take a source or someone else’s idea and say it in your own words. When you paraphrase, you must still give the author’s name, date, title of the source, the scholarly journal it came from, and the exact website address or book.
Due to the nature of a research proposal, you should have less than 100 words of quotation. When you directly quote a source, it must have quotation marks around the quote, or (if 40 words or more) it must be set in block quotation format. Using APA style citations provide detailed information of where you acquired the quote.
For the purpose of this academic paper, adhere to the following rules when quoting or using a source:
· Do not directly quote more than 30 words from any 1 source.
· If the source is 2,000 words or less, do not directly quote more than 25 words from the source.
· When quoting or paraphrasing, do not use the same source more than 3 times within the whole document.
· Quotes must follow APA style and contain the section (if provided) and paragraph or page numbers of the quote.
· In all instances, use current APA guidelines for citations and references.
The literature review portion of the Research Proposal: Final Assignment must not be a series of quotations and you must explain the quotation relevance/application to your proposal. Because of this, paraphrasing is preferred to quotation since it demands an understanding of the material. You may email your instructor with any questions regarding the Research Proposal: Final Assignment.
Additional Help
Schindler’s (2019) chapter 17 provides a good orientation to all the elements of research and Schindler’s (2019) appendix a provides a solid orientation to the research proposal.
You should examine a couple published literature reviews so you can familiarize yourself with what a literature review is and how it is set up. Below are 2 published literature reviews from the Jerry Falwell Library databases that will help you understand the literature review portion of the research proposal assignment (see Resources section for links).
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347376
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 185–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310383911
For assistance on how to identify scholarly sources, refer to the Liberty University Research Portal tutorials (see Resources section) on Defining Databases and Journals.
View the Research Proposal: Final Resources section under the Research Proposal: Final page.
Page 1 of 2
,
Criteria Ratings Points
Content – Topic Coverage – Title, Executive Summary, Introduction, Problem Statement, Management Dilemma, Research Question(s) & Import ance/Significance
50 to >44.0 pts
Advanced
Thoughtful, detailed and comprehensive su mmary/introduction/pro blem statement/manag ement dilemma/research question(s) are presented. Importance/ Significance are specifically related to previous research. The topic is clearly organized, presented and discussed in detail. Demonstrates exceptional depth of knowledge of the topic. Comprehensive use of most recent and seminal sources. Clearly discriminates among seminal sources.
44 to >38.0 pts
Proficient
Discussion relates sum mary/introduction/probl em statement/manage ment dilemma/research question(s) to previous research on topic. Discussion relates importance/significance to previous research and prevents implications. The topic is organized, presented and discussed appropriately. Demonstrates proficient knowledge of the topic. Thorough selection of sources pertinent to topic. Shows some discrimination among seminal sources.
38 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Limited summary/introd uction/problem statement/management dilemma/research question(s) with some comparison to previous research. The importance/significance is unclear or fairly clear but discussed too broadly or does not meet expectations. Demonstrates a basic knowledge of the topic. Selected sources relevant to topic. Limited discrimination among seminal sources.
0 pts
Not Present
50 pts
Content – Research Design, Nature/Form of Results, Budget, Schedule, Ethical Considerations
45 to >42.0 pts
Advanced
The research design takes a clearly critical, contextualized and possibly creative stance on the topic from multiple perspectives. The work carefully examines the research design, budget, schedule ethical assumptions and results.
42 to >36.0 pts
Proficient
The research design takes a clearly critical stance on the topic from multiple perspectives. The work explores the research design, budget, schedule ethical assumptions and results.
36 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The research design somewhat critically addresses a focus in cited literature. The work considers the research design, budget, schedule ethical primarily from a single perspective, with minimal exploration of assumptions.
0 pts
Not Present
45 pts
Content – Literature Review – application of Scholarly Research
45 to >43.0 pts
Advanced
Accurately identified and applied more 10 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
43 to >36.0 pts
Proficient
Accurately identified and applied at least 9 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
36 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Accurately identified and applied between 1 – 8 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
0 pts
Not Present
45 pts
Research Proposal: Final Grading Rubric | BUSI600_D01_202240
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure – Mechanics
20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
0-1 grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate. Includes clear transitions and systematic use of headings and subheadings.
17 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
2-3 grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate. Includes transitions, headings, and subheadings.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
4-10 grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. Limited use of transitions and/or logical headings.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Structure – APA Style 20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page and References are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. Paragraphs are indented ½”.
17 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page and References are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page and References are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Structure – Paper Length
20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
Submitted more than 3,000 words excluding the title page, abstract and references.
17 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
Submitted between 2,800 – 2,999 words excluding the title page, abstract and references.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Submitted between 2,500 – 2,799 words excluding the title page, abstract and references.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Total Points: 200
Research Proposal: Final Grading Rubric | BUSI600_D01_202240
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
