Identifies strengths of the change project, but not in detail
Peer Review
Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.
Your professor will assign each of you a presentation of a peer’s to critique.
Find your assigned peer’s presentation in Discussion 6 – Question 2 and complete a peer review of your peer’s presentation using the Peer Review Form included in this module.
Then, upload your completed peer review to this assignment, and email a copy to your classmate by the end of week 6 so that they can incorporate your feedback into their final draft of the assignment.
You may write out the review in paragraph format or use bullet points. APA format is not necessary and no reference articles are required, but standard grammar and spelling are expected. Use the grading rubric to complete your assignment. The peer review feedback gained from your classmates will be incorporated into your final project. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.
Competency
13 points
10 points
5 points
0 points
Points Earned
Introduction:
Identifies strengths
Clearly identifies the strengths of the change project in detail
Identifies strengths of the change project, but not in detail
Does not clearly identify strengths of the project
No paper submitted and/or content missing
/13
Introduction:
Identifies areas for improvement
Specifies areas that need improvement in detail
Suggests areas that need improvement, but lacks detail
Mentions areas to improve with little detail
No paper submitted and/or content missing
/13
Six-step change plan: Identifies strengths
Clearly identifies strengths of the six-step plan in detail
Identifies some strengths of the six-step plan but lacks detail
Does not identify strengths of the six step plan
No paper submitted and/or content missing
/13
Six-step change plan: Identifies areas for improvement
Specifies areas of the six-step plan that need improvement.
Suggests areas that need improvement, but lacks detail
Limited or poor suggestions of areas that need improvement
No paper submitted and/or content missing
/13
Summary: Describes the key points of the summary
Clearly describes all of the key points of the summary
Describes the key points of the summary, but not in detail
Does not describe the key points of the summary with any detail
No paper submitted and/or content missing
/13
Summary: Describes areas that could be strengthened
Clearly describes areas that could be strengthened in detail
Describes areas that could be strengthened, but not in detail
Does not describe areas that could be strengthened in a way that is clear
No paper submitted and/or content missing
/13
Competency
5 points
3 points
1 point
0 point
Points Earned
Organization
Organization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic.
Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good support.
Organization minimally effective; problems in approach, sequence, support and transitions.
Organization does not meet requirements.
/5
Grammar
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American English
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good mostly consistent with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or understanding
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage distracting and often interfere with meaning or understanding
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage interfere with understanding
/5
References
References are relevant, authoritative and contemporary.
Adequate references.
Minimal use of appropriate references.
Poor use and/or selection of references not relevant.
/5
Competency
7 points
5 points
2 points
0 point
Points Earned
APA Format
Demonstrates competent use of mechanics and APA.
Minimal APA errors.
Many APA errors.
Complete lack of understanding.
/7
Total
/100
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
