Analyze various case examples by: a. Identifying physical performance impairments during an occupation. b. Selecting appropriate tests to assess the indentified physical performance def
Analyze various case examples by:
a. Identifying physical performance impairments during an occupation.
b. Selecting appropriate tests to assess the indentified physical performance deficits.
c. Determining and defending which model of practice/frame of reference would best guide the treatment of the identified impairments.
d. Implementing the selected frame of reference/model of practice in correcting, or compensating, for the identified impairments.
Curriculum thread(s) addressed:
· Occupation centered practice
- Role Acquisition
Assignment Objective(s):
· The student will demonstrate proficiency in applying Activity Analysis to a wheelchair activity that requires propulsion and mobility throughout a mall or shopping center.
· Student will engage in IADLS:
o Shopping
o Car transfers
o Functional Mobility to include:
o Accessing a water fountain
o Accessing the elevator
o Accessing the restrooms.
o Other functional mobility related activities
· The students will be assigned the above described functional activity which they will perform resembling a patient with a pre-determined diagnosis and disability.
· Students will analyze the functional activity outcome and submit a written assignment (minimum 3-4 pages) utilizing the following structure:
o Description of the activity(including listing the most significant steps)
o Analysis of client factors and performance skills,
o Demands and requirements of the activity,
o Environmental and physical context assessment,
o List of recommendations that are evidence based
4
Community/Functional Mobility Analysis: Trip to the Mall
Name:_____________________
Date: ______________
Course: OTA 104/105: Activity Analysis
Course objective(s):
UNIT SEVEN: Analyzing Human Motion in Daily Activity
Upon successful completion of this unit on written and practical examination, the student will:
Analyze various case examples by:
a. Identifying physical performance impairments during an occupation.
b. Selecting appropriate tests to assess the indentified physical performance deficits.
c. Determining and defending which model of practice/frame of reference would best guide the treatment of the identified impairments.
d. Implementing the selected frame of reference/model of practice in correcting, or compensating, for the identified impairments.
Curriculum thread(s) addressed:
· Occupation centered practice
· Role Acquisition
Assignment Objective(s):
· The student will demonstrate proficiency in applying Activity Analysis to a wheelchair activity that requires propulsion and mobility throughout a mall or shopping center.
· Student will engage in IADLS:
· Shopping
· Car transfers
· Functional Mobility to include:
· Accessing a water fountain
· Accessing the elevator
· Accessing the restrooms.
· Other functional mobility related activities
· The students will be assigned the above described functional activity which they will perform resembling a patient with a pre-determined diagnosis and disability.
· Students will analyze the functional activity outcome and submit a written assignment (minimum 3-4 pages) utilizing the following structure:
· Description of the activity(including listing the most significant steps)
· Analysis of client factors and performance skills,
· Demands and requirements of the activity,
· Environmental and physical context assessment,
· List of recommendations that are evidence based
Resources/supplies used to demonstrate skill:
· Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (OTPF) to be used as a guide to analyze the foundational elements of task Performance
· Application of concepts previously learned about activity analysis
Criteria |
Poor (1) |
Fair (2 ) |
Good (3) |
Excellent (4) |
Use of proper terminology and grammar |
Use of inaccurateterminology or grammaron more than 9 occasions. |
Use of inaccurateterminology or grammar on no more than 7 occasions. |
Good; use of inaccurateterminology or grammar on no more than 5 occasions. |
Excellent; use of inaccurateterminology or grammar on no more than 3 occasions. |
Organization and structure |
Did not follow the structure and organization of paper as recommended at 3 or more times or sections |
Fair; however, did not follow the structure and organization of paper as recommendedat 2 times or sections |
Good; did not follow the structure and organization of paper as recommendedat 1 time or section |
Excellent; followed the structure and organization of paper as recommended at all times |
Accurately completed the section related to the brief description of the activity. |
Completed the section 25% accurately with comprehensive information |
Completed the section 50% accurately with comprehensive information |
Completed the section 75% accurately with comprehensive information |
Completed the section 100% accurately with comprehensive information |
Accurately completed all sections of the self reflection of the Activity |
Did not complete accurately 5-6 questions of the self reflection of the activity |
Fair; did not complete accurately 3-4 questions of the self reflection of the activity |
Good; didnot complete accurately 1-2 questions of the self reflection of the activity |
Excellent; completed accurately all sections of the self reflection of the Activity |
Identified the most significant and meaningful steps of the activity in a sequential order |
Did not identify 5-6 important steps accurately |
Fair; did notidentify 3-4 important steps accurately |
Good; did not identify 1-2 important steps accurately |
Excellent; identified all steps accurately |
Identify all client factors accurately |
Did not complete client factors accurately 5-6 times |
Fair; did not complete client factors accurately 3-4 times |
Good; did not complete client factors accurately 1-2 times |
Excellent; identify all client factors accurately |
Identify all client performance skills accurately |
Did not identify client’s performance skills accurately 5-6 times |
Fair; did not identifyclient’s performance skills accurately 3-4 times |
Good; did not identify client’s performance skills accurately 1-2 times |
Excellent; identified all client’s performance skills accurately |
Identified the demands and the requirements of the activity accurately |
Did notto identify accurately the demands and requirements of performing the activity on 5-6 occasions |
Fair; did notidentify accurately the demands and requirements of performing the activity on 3-4 occasions |
Good; did notidentify accurately the demands and requirements of performing the activity on 1-2 occasions |
Excellent; identified all the demands and requirements of performing the activity accurately |
Identifiedenvironmental and physical context assessment accurately |
Did notidentify the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity on 5-6 occasions accurately |
Fair; did not identify accurately the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity on 3-4 occasions |
Good; did not identify accurately the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity on 1-2 occasions |
Excellent; identified all the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity accurately |
Completed the list of problems accurately |
Did not complete 5-6 problems accurately |
Did notcomplete 3-4 problems accurately |
Good; did not complete1-2 problems accurately |
Excellent; accurately completed the list of problems |
Completed the list of evidence based recommendations accurately |
Did not complete or missed 5-6 evidence based recommendations accurately |
Fair; did not completeor missed 3-4 evidence based recommendations accurately |
Good; did not completeor missed 1-2 evidence based recommendations accurately |
Excellent; completed the list of evidence based recommendations accurately |
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience |
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 25% of the content |
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 50% of the content |
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 75% of the content |
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 100% of the content |
Comment:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Score: The total score to accumulate is “48”. Your score was _____________ with a
percentage of ________________ .
ACOTE Standards for an Accredited Educational Program for the Occupational Therapy Assistant:
(B.1.1., B. 3.2. ,B.4.3., B.4.4., B.4.9., B.4.10., B.4.14)
Revised 04/29/2020 JM
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.