The Ruling of the court, when is an act considered as Sexual Harassment
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →Case Digests References: A. RA 7877 a) In the Workplace 1. Villarama vs NLRC ( 236 SCRA 280 ) ii. Dr. Rico Jacutin vs People of the Philippines G.R. No. 121863, May 5,1997 b) In the School Campus i. University of the Philippines vs Catunggal G.R. No. 121863 1. State the Ruling of the court, when is an act considered as Sexual Harassment in: a) The Workplace b) The School Campus 2. Following your answer in 1a, present the similarities of the merits of the cases (Villarama vs NLRC and Dr. Rico Jacutin vs People of the Philippines) using the table below by identifying two (2) recognizable and meritorious factors that would best capture the essence of your answer in la. CASE TITLE Villarama vs NLRC Dr. Rico Jacutin vs People Factor 1 Factor 2 3. Following your answer in 1b, State and explain one (1) aggravating circumstance present in the case ( University of the Philippines vs Catunggal ) that clearly points out to the role of an educational institution.
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds