R. v. Dharamdeo (2000), 149 C.C.C. (3d) 489 (Ontario Court of Appeal) A young man is convicted of one count of impaired driving for an incident that involved the car he was driving hitting a lamppost, splitting it in two, and demol- ishing a bus shelter.

(Canadian law) For each of the following situations, should you impose a conditional sentence? Indicate whether or not you would impose a conditional sentence. if so, what additional requirements you would add on as part of a conditional sen- tence order. Give the reasons for your decision.→

R. v. Dharamdeo (2000), 149 C.C.C. (3d) 489 (Ontario Court of Appeal) A young man is convicted of one count of impaired driving for an incident that involved the car he was driving hitting a lamppost, splitting it in two, and demol- ishing a bus shelter. He was found guilty of impaired driving causing bodily harm for another incident in which he lost control of the car; it became airborne and struck two other vehicles. One person was injured. In the first incident, he was in contraven- tion of his learner’s permit, which required that he drive with a licensed driver.