R. v. Bogart (2001), (Ontario Superior Court of Justice) A doctor, described as being very gifted in psychotherapy treatment for patients with HIV

(Canadian Law) For each of the following situations, should you impose a conditional sentence? Indicate whether or not you would impose a conditional sentence. if so, what additional requirements you would add on as part of a conditional sen- tence order. Give the reasons for your decision.→

R. v. Bogart (2001), (Ontario Superior Court of Justice) A doctor, described as being very gifted in psychotherapy treatment for patients with HIV, is convicted of defrauding the Ontario Health Insurance Plan of $922 780. The fraud was the largest single fraud against the plan. He used much of the money to go on expensive trips with his lover, who turned the doctor in when the relationship ended. The doctor claimed that it was an abusive relationship.