Your first goal is to decide on the topic and determine your stance/argument. Your topic choice is open.
Completeee the workk sheet based on the Eassay downbelow
—
1. Topic. Your first goal is to decide on the topic and determine your stance/argument. Your topic choice is open. Ask yourself, if I were to create a poster, flyer, or ad in order to advocate for something I believe in, what would it be about? What would it look like? Where would it be posted or published? For the topic, you can
2. Argument, audience, and appeals. What, specifically, doo you want your audience to think, feel, or do after reading your visual argument? That is, what might be your main idea or claim? Importantly, also consider where your target audience stands in comparison to your views/stance. In other words, are they a neutral audience needing information, an agreeable audience needing to be pushed to action, an opposing audience needing to open or change their mind?
Who do you imagine as your target audience? Who needs to hear what you have to say?
How might your intended audience need to hear or see your argument? Should your approach be strong and direct? Gentle and implicit? Serious? Emotional? Humorous?
3. Genre and Platform. While you may choose to compose within and across any of the visual genres described in the textbook—photograph(s), drawing(s), poster, flyer, cartoon(s), or web page—I recommend creating a public affairs or advocacy ad, poster, or flyer.
Detail here what you imagine your visual will be (a public affairs or advocacy ad, poster, photo, drawing, flyer, cartoon, web page):
Detail here where you imagine this visual argument is going to appear (as a one-page magazine or newspaper spread, a flyer, poster on the subway or elsewhere, commercial, billboard, Web page, etc.).
Explain your intentions for genre and why you think it’s the best choice given your goals. Namely, explain why your intended audience would be most receptive to (and likely to come across) the genre and platform you’ll choose.
4. Visual design: What visual design and layout are you thinking about using? Portrait/landscape? Color scheme? Busy/simple? How can font sizes and styles, layout, and color be used in this visual argument to create a strong impression? Consider which will work best to grab your specific audience’s attention and be persuasive.
How much verbal text might you use? Why? Will your verbal elements be a slogan, express the core of the argument, provide statistics or other evidence, or summarize and comment on the image(s)? Why might your selection of text be effective to your audience?
If your argument lends itself to images or graphics, what photo, graphics, or drawing would support your claim or have an emotional appeal? (If you want to use more than one image/graphic, be careful that you don’t clutter your page and confuse your message. Simplicity and clarity are important.) What image would be memorable and meaningful to your audience? Would a photo image or drawing be more effective? Will your image(s) be used to provide evidence for your claim or illustrate a main idea, evoke emotions, or enhance your credibility and authority?
5. Rough Sketch: Take out a piece of paper and do a quick rough sketch of your visual argument. It’s ok if it’s terrible. It’s ok if you don’t end up using it. But it helps to visualize it rather than just talk about it. After you draw it, take a picture of it, email it to yourself, and then copy/paste it below. Of course, if you want to use other technologies besides pen and paper, go for it! Just paste it in.
“Eng 21001
Why should we stop the death penalty?
There are 195 countries in the world today. According to the organization, Amnesty International, only 53 countries continue to have capital punishment. Should the United States also have to keep the death penalty. Is the death penalty an example of justice?. Well, some people in United State believe that we should keep the death penalty so the criminals will not have a second chance to do another crime also they would relax because there are no more criminals outside so they’re not in danger no more. But supporters of abolishing the death penalty believe that having the death penalty will increase violence in society. If the United States still thinking about being a country of justice, then it must abolish the death penalty because the death penalty wastes government money. The second reason the death penalty does not serve as a deterrence to crime. According to studies, states that have the death sentence have greater murder rates than states that do not have the death penalty in place. Also, The death penalty is more likely to be used against individuals of color, the poor, and those with mental problems than it is against white, rich, and physically fit people. This is a blatantly unfair and unjust situation.
The death penalty is a contentious and divisive issue, and there are compelling arguments on both sides of the argument. There are, nevertheless, several spelling arguments in favor of abolishing the death sentence. To understand the debate about the death penalty, we need to know the historical context and key terms. Rehabilitation is the process of fixing someone to return to normal life through training. Retribution is given punishment to someone for a criminal act. The difference between rehabilitation and retribution is one of the training and teaching a person to become a better person. Others are unpunished for taking serious actions like criminals. The 8th amendment is cruel and unusual punishment, excessive bail. The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution is the section of the Bill of Rights that states that punishments must be fair, cannot be cruel, and that extraordinarily large fines cannot be set. And it has been prohibited. This means that the amendment doesn’t work anymore. It’s justice as fairness because it’s for everyone who has done bad to give them punishment fairly but not by giving them the death penalty. Also gives the person what he or she deserves by what they have done.
We should support abolishing the death penalty because it wastes the government’s money, time, and resources. According to studies, states with the death sentence had greater crime rates than ones without the death penalty. We should advocate for the abolition of the death penalty because it is a waste of government money, time, and resources. To demonstrate, the author of “The New York Times” writes, “Using the death sentence is a waste of the government’s resources.” (From the New York Times, 2018) This phrase essentially suggests that having a death sentence government system wastes a lot of money.
Instead of spending so much money, we might utilize it for building or aiding the needy. This is significant because the government is spending 5 billion dollars merely to execute criminals when they might instead grant life without the possibility of release. The criminal sentence does not include the possibility of parole. As we can see, the government wastes a lot of money by imposing a death sentence. It is not worth spending over $7 billion to execute each individual. We should use this money to enhance “society” in the United States. Finally, we should advocate for the abolition of the death penalty since it is a waste of government resources. Money spent on the death penalty should be better spent on improving society.
The death penalty will not alleviate the problem of crime; rather, it will increase the level of violence in our communities. In the words of Semon Frank Thompson,(2018) “to kill the person who has killed someone maintains the cycle of violence, which eventually destroys both the avenging party and the offender.” According to the evidence, executing the offender will increase violence in society. In addition to having an impact on the criminal, it will have an impact on the persons who are involved in the execution. This is critical because, if we continue to kill and kill, we will eventually destroy our civilization. The death sentence does not affect the reduction of criminal activity. The death sentence has been shown to increase the rate of criminal activity. The use of the death penalty is not the answer. It causes more harm than good to society, and it is a strain on the environment. This is one of the reasons why many other countries have abolished the death sentence. To summarize, the death penalty is harmful to both the convict and the person who participates in the execution, and maintaining the death penalty will cost a significant amount of money. When it comes to crime, the death sentence is not an effective deterrent and encourages more violence in society. For the simple reason that killing the person who committed a crime perpetuates the cycle of violence, which ultimately destroys not only the offender but also the avenging party, it is necessary. The death sentence also has an impact on those who are involved in the execution, such as the executioner, in addition to those who are victims of the crime. This is critical because, if we continue to kill and kill, we will eventually destroy our society. The death sentence is also extremely expensive, both in terms of financial resources and in terms of human lives. As a result of these considerations, numerous countries have abolished the death sentence.
The article by The New York Times claims that the death penalty should be abolished since it is just a waste of time and resources. It also argued that the resources used for the death penalty can just be used for the improvement of other government initiatives. This is greatly connected to an article written by Semon Frank Thompson (2018) which also explains why the death penalty should be abolished. It clearly emphasizes the fact that the death penalty will not improve the crime rates of a country, but worsen the violence in the society. It also supports the claim of the New York Times article that the death penalty only wastes the resources of the government. This is why some countries have chosen to abolish death penalties in their countries and focus on improving other government initiatives instead. Both articles affirm that the death penalty should be abolished since it does not have positive effects on society.
Not everyone agrees to abolish the death penalty, instead, these critics agree that giving the death penalty will warn future criminals not to do crimes. According to Jonah Goldberg J. (2014) “The death penalty makes sure of is that these evil and uncivilized human beings can never harm another soul. That is the goal of justice-to make it easier for people to sleep at night knowing there is one less criminal out there.”(Goldberg, 2014). The quote means giving the death penalty to the criminal who will not be able to kill someone else. Also giving the death penalty to the criminal other people will be safe and know that there is no criminal out there. Both Goldberg and Thompson believe that the death penalty is ineffective in deterring crime. Goldberg, on the other hand, claims that the death penalty is vital to safeguard society from dangerous offenders. Thompson, on the other side, contends that the death penalty fosters societal violence.
Although this is an understandable point, the argument that abolishing the penalty is stronger because estimated that out of 100 criminals that get condemned with capital punishment 4 of them is innocent. There is only one step we can take to ensure that an innocent person is never executed, and that is to replace the death penalty. To demonstrate this idea “race and capital punishment in the US have always been inseparable. According to the Death Penalty Information Center in 2021 (DPIC), 56% of death row inmates are black or Hispanic.” (Brown-Dean, 2014) This means it can be concluded that race and capital punishment play an important role in who receives the death penalty. It shows that white people have more rights than other races. That does not show equal rights and instead shows racism. We have to give people a chance, not just kill them and waste a lot of money that could help the country to become better. We should abolish the death penalty because it’s race and great more violence and problem in society.
As the research has demonstrated, abolishing the death penalty is the right choice for the United States. As we stated before, the death penalty wastes the government’s money, time and resources. Giving the death penalty will bring more violence in society. People are punished more by their race. They are not giving everyone equal rights. When there’s a white man shooting someone then it becomes the person was sick. But when a brown or black people shoot someone they probably get shoot back by the police or getting death penalty. White people have more rights than brown or black people. The government needs to fix this. Everyone needs to have equal rights. The racism started in 1619, now it is almost 2020 and there’s still racism. Everyone makes mistakes and some people learn from their mistakes easily and some the hard way. United States should stop the death penalty. And it will save money and there will be less violence.
This means it can be concluded that race and capital punishment play an important role in who receives the death penalty. It shows that white people have more rights than other races. That does not show equal rights and instead shows racism. We have to give people a chance, not just kill them and waste a lot of money that could help the country to become better. We should abolish the death penalty because it’s racist and a tunnel to a great more violence and problem in society.
Works Cited
Brown-Dean, K.L. (2014) Justice and Victims of Color. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/04/06/what-it-means-if-the-death-penalty-is-dying/justice-and-victims-of-color.
Goldberg, J. (2014). In Defense of Capital Punishment. Retrieved from
http://www.nationalreview.com/2014/05/defense-capital-punishment-Jonah-Goldberg/.
New York Times (2018). Capital Punishment Deserves a Quick Death. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/31/opinion/capital-punishment-death-penalty.html.
Thompson, S. F. (2018). Support the death penalty? Then assist with an execution – The Boston Globe. Retrieved from
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2018/09/01/support-death-penalty-then-assist-with-execution/mDrbnt4a2Z6qv61Z7qwl1N/story.html.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
