Troy sues his local council for negligence afler falling over low logs placed across a grassy area near a beach reserve.
Troy sues his local council for negligence afler falling over low logs placed across a grassy area near a beach reserve. He suffered head injuries and slight brain damage when his head struck some rocks on the ground. He alleges that his sight was fixed on a row of large rocks that had been placed a few metre; beyond the row of logs. A sign that said “Enter Reserve Here” was next to the rocks, and Troy claims this diverted his attention from the logs. The council is defending the claim, and alleges Troy was not looking where he was going. filled out an incident report form. In response to the question “Cause of accident”, he wrote the words: “Tripped over concealed logs ?’??!!l”. The trial judge admits the report, despite objections, as evidence of how the accident happened. Troy’s lawyer also calls a visual perception analyst, Matt, to give evidence. Matt has worked for the Army, advising and training military personnel on watching out for land mines and other land surface hazards. He has qualifications in optometry and psychology. In his examination in chief, Matt gives evidence that he has acted as a consultant on safety, and matters involving human perception of linear hazards and spaces, for several government agencies, theme parks and sporting venues. He considers himself an “ingress and egress expert” in visual perception analysis, gained through experience after his military work. Matt’s evidence is that the presence of the row of rocks and the spaces between them detracted fi’om the visibility of the logs, thereby posing a significant risk of gripping and falling. He says the logs would not have been visible to Troy, whose visual perception was naturally focused on the rocks, particularly because they were marked as representing the entrance to the reserve. Further, because the logs were low, and in relevant places covered by grass, they were relegated only to Troy’s peripheral vision. In cross-examination, it transpires that Matt did not visit the site in question for the purposes of this report, and that he worked from photographs. However, he claims to be familiar with the area because he has holidayed there with his family. Further, he interviewed Troy about the accident, but did not engage in any visual testing. His testimony is that it would make no difference if he had visited the site or put Troy through some tests, because he had “seen many cases like this before”. When asked why people might stop looking where they are walking once they see their destination in sight, he replies: “Believe me, this is a well-known phenomenon in visual perception studies. It is well-documented in the liIeEaJJJLe and I have referenced that literature in my report.” Asked to explain how he came to his conclusions, Matt replies “Well, I’ve set out all my conclusions in the report. No one has suggested that I’m wrong.” The council’s barrister s__ay_s_ “No more questions, your Honour.” The council’s barrister argues that the report should not be admitted and that, even if it is admitted, Matt’s evidence has low probative value. He says Matt could only be seen as an “expert in walking in and out of parks”, and that this is a matter of common knowledge for which an expert is not required. Finally, the council calls the independent witness who rang for an ambulance, Kim, who is an elderly local resident. She gives evidence that she was leaning on her front fence across the road and saw Troy approach the entrance to the reserve. She says she saw Troy approach the
logs and then look up to observe a herd of screeching cockatoos as he walked ahead. Troy’s legal team have reason to believe Kim is m Address the following issues with reference to Evidence Act 1995 NSW or CTH: 1. What could the respective parties argue in relation to the admissibility of Matt’s testimony and report? 2. Should the trail judge have admitted the paramedic’s report? 3. On what basis could Troy’s counsel pursue the issue of Kim’s eyesight?
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
