, The court decided against the applicant and cited the following ratio decidendi (reasoning): Accommodating the applicants would have created hardship in the form of relived trauma for rape victims
Question 1 (1 point) In XY v. Ontario (Government and Consumer Services), The court decided against the applicant and cited the following ratio decidendi (reasoning): Accommodating the applicants would have created hardship in the form of relived trauma for rape victims Accommodating the applicant would have created hardship for the centre for young offenders O The applicant did not show bona fide ( genuine) belief that she needs the professional training The applicant abandoned the application before the final hearing and was warned by the court that abandoning the the case would result in losing the case Question 2 (1 point) Which of these Human Rights cases was decided by the Supreme Court of Canada? Didier v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation OXY v. Ontario (Government and Consumer Services) Siadat v. Ontario College of Teachers Multaniv, Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys Question 3 (1 point) The duty to accommodate is absolute, meaning that it always applies even it the cost of accommodation exceeds the benefit of doing business. True False
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
