The skeptic argues that if we are sometimes mistaken about our beliefs, then it is logically possible that we are always mistaken and that we, therefore, do not have knowledge.

The skeptic argues that if we are sometimes mistaken about our beliefs, then it is logically possible that we are always mistaken and that we, therefore, do not have knowledge. How does this argument succeed or fail?

The essay should include the following:

A presentation of rationalism and empiricism.

A presentation of a priori and a posteriori knowledge.

A discussion of how each can lead to doubt.

PHL105 Intro to Philosophy

Module 2 Assignment  

Short Paper 2

Critically assess the claim that people are free to make moral decisions. Do you agree? Why or why not?

In this paper you must:

Take a clear stance

Draw on Philosophy to prove your position, not an opinion

PHL105 Intro to Philosophy

Module 4 Assignment  

Short Paper 3

What is God?

In this paper you must:

Take a clear stance

Draw on Philosophy to prove your position, not an opinion

PHL105 Intro to Philosophy

Module 5 Assignment  

Short Paper 4

The statement:

If God exists, then life has meaning. God does not exist. Therefore, life has no meaning

In this paper you must answer the following:

Is this inductive or deductive arguments?

Is this statement valid and sound? If they are invalid or unsound, why?

Is there anything else wrong with this statement?

PHL105 Intro to Philosophy

Module 6 Assignment  

Short Paper 5

Suppose you are an act-utilitarian, and you must choose between two courses of action. In the first action, you could make a stranger very happy by giving her $100. In the second action, you could make another stranger even happier by giving him the same amount of money—but this action would involve breaking a promise to a friend. According to act-utilitarianism, which action is the morally right one? Do you agree with this choice? Why or why not?

In this paper you must:

Draw on Philosophy to prove your position, not an opinion