As a member of the Executive Team for an organization serving vulnerable children, you have been tasked to prepare a report
As a member of the Executive Team for an organization serving vulnerable children, you have been tasked to prepare a report summarizing the development of a program to support these children. Your task as an experienced manager hoping to convince others to address the problem is to prepare an Issue. The brief should be between 4-6 pgs in length (not including bibliography); single spaced with one-inch margins using a 10–12-point sized font. It is to be presented in a format that clearly outlines content marked with headings for the following sections:
Topic: Dual Status Youth also known as Crossover Youth
Nature of the Problem: facts on the nature of this problem, (incidence, prevalence, special needs of this population)
Risk Factors: the individual, familial and community risks that have contributed to the problem,
Policy Implications: relevant policy initiatives or laws around the problem,
Case for Support: why it makes sense (and cents) for the community to support this population and fund programs to support the problem,
Collaborating Systems: other systems that may also be serving these children,
Protective Factors: the protective factors that may be lacking in the families of these children,
Program Models: at least three program models or evidence-based interventions to improve the outcomes for these specific children and families in the child welfare system,
Current Resources Available– resources already available to address the issue and support the population, and
Prevention: discuss ways that the problem could have been prevented from affecting children altogether.
Resources to get started:
https://jjie.org/hub/dual-status-youth/
https://jjie.org/hub/dual-status-youth/key-issues/
https://cjjr.georgetown.edu/our-work/crossover-youth-practice-model/
https://www.socialworktoday.com/archive/Winter21p14.shtml
https://www.modelsforchange.net/reform-areas/dual-status-youth/index.html
Also, there are several resources attached including examples of a brief.
ADVOCACY IN ACTION:
CROSSOVER YOUTH
Advocacy in Action is a series of briefs focused
on issues of potential importance to the
court-appointed special advocates (CASAs) or
guardians ad litem (GALs) who advocate for
the best interests of children who have been
neglected or abused. Understanding how these
issues may impact child and family outcomes is
foundational to being a successful advocate.
Each Advocacy in Action brief starts with a
summary of the issue and how it may impact
children who have been neglected or abused,
followed by recommended actions for advocates
in light of the research. Each brief also includes a
promising practice from the nationwide network
of CASA/GAL programs and a list of resources for
those interested in learning more.
Though these issues are interrelated, each brief
is categorized as pertaining to either children’s
safety, permanency, or well-being.
11/2018
WELL-BEING
Crossover youth are more likely to receive harsh sentences and to be
detained on first-time charges.
CROSSOVER YOUTH
WHY IT MATTERS
Crossover youth are youth involved in both the child
welfare and juvenile justice systems. In short, they
have experienced maltreatment (resulting in their child
welfare involvement)
and have engaged in
delinquency, bringing
them to the attention
of the juvenile justice
system. Dually involved
youth are youth who
have had some level of system contact with the child
welfare and juvenile justice systems, whereas dually
adjudicated youth are court-involved in both systems.
It is difficult to determine just how many youth are
involved in both systems, and getting an accurate
estimate often depends on how broadly dual system
involvement is defined. Some estimates suggest that
more than 50 percent of youth in the juvenile justice
system also have child welfare involvement.1 In field
work with several jurisdictions across the country,
the Robert F. Kennedy National Resource Center for
Juvenile Justice found that approximately two-thirds
of the juvenile justice populations in those jurisdictions
had some level of child welfare system involvement.2
Crossover youth,
compared to youth
who are only involved
in one system (child
welfare or juvenile
justice), experience
higher rates of criminal justice involvement and use
of public support services as adults. Additionally,
they often struggle with mental health problems,
substance abuse, unemployment, homelessness, poor
educational outcomes and recidivism.3 Crossover youth
are more likely to receive harsh sentences, are more
likely to be detained on first-time charges and are
less likely to receive probation versus incarceration,
compared to youth who have not had any child
welfare involvement.4 Youth of color, disproportionately
represented in both child welfare and juvenile justice
systems, are more likely to have poor outcomes.
1 ADVOCACY IN ACTION: Crossover Youth
WELL-BEING
AN OVERVIEW OF PATHWAYS LEADING TO IDENTIFICATION AS A DUALLY-INVOLVED YOUTH
Starting Point Occurrence Result
Pathway 1 Youth has an open child welfare case
Youth is arrested Youth enters the delinquency system
Pathway 2 Youth is arrested Youth has a previously closed child welfare case
Referral is made to child welfare
Pathway 3 Youth is arrested—no previous contact with child welfare
Upon investigation, maltreatment is discovered
Referral is made to child welfare
Pathway 4
Youth is arrested,
adjudicated, and
placed in a correctional
placement
Time in correctional placement ends, but there is no safe home to return to
Referrral to child welfare
From Denise Herz, Philip Lee, Lorrie Lutz, Macon Stewart, et. al., Addressing the Needs of Multi-System Youth: Strengthening the Connection between Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice (Washington, DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform and the Robert F. Kennedy Children’s Action Corps, March 2012), 3, http://bit.ly/1jmO3mg. Used with permission.
THE CROSSOVER YOUTH PRACTICE MODEL (CYPM)
The Center for Juvenile Justice Reform (CJJR)
at the Georgetown University McCourt School
of Public Policy developed the Crossover Youth
Practice Model (CYPM)5 with the purpose of
improving outcomes for youth who are involved in
both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems.
The CYPM is based on the notion that when
child welfare, juvenile justice, related agencies
and partners collaborate to address the needs of
these youth, better life outcomes can happen.
CASA volunteers are important partners in these
collaborations, known as “CYPM implementation
teams.” According to the authors of the CYPM,
given that CASA volunteers are often assigned
to more complicated cases and crossover
youths’ cases are generally quite complex, an
experienced CASA volunteer can make a significant
impact in how crossover youth are supported.
Accordingly, the authors recommend that CYPM
implementation teams invite CASA volunteers to
participate in the planning and implementation
of the model from the beginning of the process.
2 ADVOCACY IN ACTION: Crossover Youth
WELL-BEING
ADVOCATES IN ACTION
Estimates suggest that more than 50 percent of youth in the juvenile justice system also have child welfare involvement.6
ACTIONS RELATED TO THE CYPM
The authors of the CYPM have the following
recommendations for CASA volunteer
participation in CYPM implementation teams:7
• Get involved in CYPM planning and
implementation. CASA volunteers can help
inform the CYPM protocols, related tools and
youth and family engagement strategies. They
should be key stakeholders in the implementation
team from the onset of the effort.
• Strive to become involved as early as possible
in a crossover case. Since CASA volunteers often
know the youths’ particular circumstances and
history, they are in a position to share important
information and act as liaisons for needed
services for the youth across both systems.
• Participate in the case planning team. The CASA
volunteer should participate in all multidisciplinary
team meetings, as well as meetings with the youth
and family. They can work closely with staff from
both juvenile justice and child welfare agencies to
ensure that everyone has the same understanding
of case plan goals and requirements and
the responsibilities of all involved.
• Seek access to information about the youth.
In order to be most effective in their roles, CASA
volunteers should be equipped with relevant
information on the youth in a timely manner
which will leverage their role in providing
sound best interest advocacy for the youth.
• Advocate for youths’ involvement in “normal
activities.” These youth are often so inundated
with therapeutic supports and services that they do
not have an opportunity to participate in regular
activities that would serve to support their growth
and development. CASA volunteers can advocate
for the youth’s participation in recreational and
social activities in their school and community.
OTHER ACTIONS TO CONSIDER
• Learn more about and attend trainings
pertaining to crossover youth, especially if you
work with older youth. Learn about risk factors
for dual involvement as they pertain to the youth
you advocate for. This may help you intervene
to address those risk factors for that youth.
• Learn more about the delinquency system,
whether youth you advocate for are eligible for
diversion, such as participating in community
3 ADVOCACY IN ACTION: Crossover Youth
WELL-BEING
service versus placement in juvenile detention,
and how long it is appropriate for them to
be held in detention, so you can understand
their rights and advocate accordingly.
• Get to know staff from the juvenile justice
courts and agencies ahead of being assigned a
crossover youth. Establishing a relationship ahead
of time will help ensure a strong partnership
on behalf of the youth’s best interests.
• Acquire an understanding of the juvenile justice
system. It is important to understand, for example,
that the delinquency case nor any information
related to it should be discussed with the youth until
after adjudication occurs. This will help prevent
incriminating information from being divulged
that could require the CASA volunteer to be
summoned as a witness in the delinquency case..
• Become acquainted with juvenile justice
system supports and offerings. This information
will help you understand what is available
to youth as they navigate the justice system
either via diversion or at adjudication.
• Learn about the connection between
behavioral health and crossing over to the
juvenile justice system, as behavioral health
concerns are a particular risk factor for many
youth in foster care due to their histories of
abuse or neglect and trauma. See “Selected
Resources” for more information.
• Advocate for youths’ best interest in schools by
ensuring that educators are informed about the
impacts of trauma and how to work with youth who
have been exposed to trauma, and understand
the links between child welfare and juvenile
justice systems. Since educational achievement
is a known protective factor to avoiding crossover
involvement, CASA volunteers should advocate for
youth’s positive school involvement. See “Selected
Resources” for more information on this topic.
BRIGHT SPOT
CROSSOVER YOUTH APPROACH: THE SOUTHWEST GEORGIA CHILDREN’S ALLIANCE
The Southwest Georgia Children’s Alliance, Inc. is an
umbrella organization first founded in 2003 as the
SOWEGA CASA program. While serving 100 percent
of the children coming before dependency court in
twelve counties, SOWEGA CASA saw the further
need to support children who are in the dependency
system, the delinquency system, and at times, both
systems. Two additional victim advocacy programs,
housed along with SOWEGA CASA and under the
guidance of a sole board of directors, were born.
The first, the Lighthouse Children’s Advocacy
Center, was created in 2012 to provide
expert forensic interviews, forensic medical
4 ADVOCACY IN ACTION: Crossover Youth
WELL-BEING
examinations, and advocacy for children who
are suspected to be victims of physical, sexual,
or exposed to domestic violence abuse.
The second, the Children in Need of Services program,
was created in 2013 with a focus on delinquency
and other adolescent problem behaviors. The 2013
passage of Georgia House Bill 242 had resulted in the
designation of a population of children as being at-risk
of neglect through their engagement in behaviors such
as running away, curfew violations, fighting in public,
and truancy. The Children in Need of Services program
was the first of its kind in Georgia. It works with these
children and families to engage them in services, with
the goal of helping youth avoid a life of criminality and
enabling them to thrive instead.
Recognizing that crossover youth are vulnerable
to a number of risk factors, the SOWEGA CASA
program commits to providing these youth with CASA
volunteers. Because of their unique challenges, the
CASA volunteers who are assigned to these youth
are experienced and well-seasoned volunteers. The
program specifically seeks out volunteers who are
working or retired teachers or social workers, or others
who have experience being in court, as they will
attend both the dependency hearings as well as the
delinquency hearings.
In addition, advocates participate in multi-
disciplinary hearings that are attended by
representatives of various agencies and the court,
school personnel, and mental health providers and
medical professionals, as appropriate. The outcomes
that the team works to achieve at these hearings
include:
• reducing youths’ juvenile justice involvement by
increasing the use of diversion when appropriate
and possible;
• reducing youths’ child welfare involvement through
prevention of out-of-home placement by improving
family capacity, increasing placement stability and
seeking permanency quickly;
• improving youths’ school outcomes including
increasing attendance, reducing discipline referrals
and suspensions, and improving on-time high
school completion;
• reducing youths’ time spent in detention;
• utilizing a trauma-informed approach during the
teaming process;
• increasing referral and screening systems to youth
to provide effective mental health and substance
use services;
• enhancing youth and family connection to the
community; and
• using wraparound community systems of care to
reduce status offenses.
Viewing crossover youth holistically and using
wraparound supports and services that take both
strengths and needs into account has been a
successful approach for SOWEGA CASA, as they work
with partners to reduce the number of crossover youth
in their jurisdiction.
For more information, contact
5 ADVOCACY IN ACTION: Crossover Youth
WELL-BEING
SELECTED RESOURCES
Name Description
American Youth Policy Forum,
Understanding Foster, Juvenile Justice and
Crossover Youth8
This resource provides several graphics depicting
outcome data across these three populations and makes
recommendations about effective interventions.
Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, The
Crossover Youth Practice Model (CYPM):
Behavioral Health and Crossover Youth9
This issue brief discusses: 1) the relationship between
behavioral health and crossover youth; 2) the ways the
Crossover Youth Practice Model addresses behavioral
health; and 3) how one jurisdiction has used CYPM to
address behavioral health outcomes.
Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, The
Crossover Youth Practice Model (CYPM):
Engaging Court and Appointed Special
Advocates to Improve Outcomes for
Crossover Youth10
This issue brief discusses the following: 1) the role of
CASA volunteers in the juvenile justice and child welfare
systems; 2) ways CASA volunteers can improve outcomes
for crossover youth; 3) how CASA volunteers fit within
the CYPM framework; and 4) how CASA volunteers have
operated in the field to make a difference for at-risk youth.
Center for Juvenile Justice Reform:
Crossover Youth Practice Model
Jurisdictions map11
This map of the United States identifies which states
and counties are currently implementing crossover youth
practice model interventions.
6 ADVOCACY IN ACTION: Crossover Youth
WELL-BEING
Name Description
Center for Juvenile Justice Reform,
Keeping Youth in School and Out of the
Justice System: Promising Practices and
Approaches12
According to this resource, when revising school policies
and implementing school-based diversion programs, there
are four important strategies that policymakers, educators,
and juvenile justice leaders should consider: training staff,
addressing disproportionality and disparities, developing
school-justice partnerships, and collecting and evaluating
data. This resource can be shared with education and
child welfare partners to create a better understanding
of how schools can protect students from justice system
involvement (or exacerbate it).
The National Child Traumatic Stress
Network (NCTSN), Crossover Youth and
Trauma-Informed Practice13
This webinar covers findings from research on crossover
youth and how traumatic stress plays a role in their
trajectory, as well as implications for policy and practice. It
expands on policy and practice implications with discussions
of strategies for policy reform and ways to translate
research into promising practices.
7 ADVOCACY IN ACTION: Crossover Youth
WELL-BEING
ENDNOTES
1 Douglas Thomas (ed.), “When Systems
Collaborate: How Three Jurisdictions Improved
Their Handling of Dual-Status Cases“(Pittsburgh,
PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice, April
2015): 3, http://www.ncjj.org/Publication/When-
Systems-Collaborate-How-Three-Jurisdictions-
Improved-their-Handling-of-Dual-Status-Cases.
aspx.
2 David Altschuler, Gary Stangler, Kent Berkley,
Leonard Burton, “Supporting Youth in Transition
to Adulthood: Lessons Learned from Child Welfare
and Juvenile Justice” (Center for Juvenile Justice
Reform and Jim Casey Youth Opportunities
Initiative, April 2009): 9.
3 Ibid.
4 Hui Huang, Joseph P. Ryan, &Denise Herz, “The
journey of dually-involved youth: The description
and prediction of re-reporting and recidivism”
(Children and Youth Services Review, 2012). 34.
https://jbcc.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/journey_
of_dually-involved_youth_huang_ryan_herz_2012.
5 Lenhoff, C., Jones-Kelly, H., & Abbott, S. (2017).
The Crossover Youth Practice Model (CYPM).
Georgetown University McCourt School of Public
Policy, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.
6 Douglas Thomas (ed.), “When Systems
Collaborate: How Three Jurisdictions Improved
Their Handling of Dual-Status Cases“(Pittsburgh,
PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice, April
2015): 3, http://www.ncjj.org/Publication/When-
Systems-Collaborate-How-Three-Jurisdictions-
Improved-their-Handling-of-Dual-Status-Cases.
aspx.
7 Ibid.
8 Understanding Foster, Juvenile Justice and
Crossover Youth, American Youth Policy Forum, nd,
https://spark.adobe.com/page/TK0GmOayfk2E2/
9 Abbott, S. & Barnett, E. (2015). The Crossover
Youth Practice Model (CYPM): Behavioral Health
and Crossover Youth, Center for Juvenile Justice
Reform. Available at: https://cjjr.georgetown.edu/
cjjr-publishes-issue-brief-on-behavioral-health-and-
crossover-youth/
10 Lenhoff, C., Jones-Kelly, H., & Abbott, S. (2017).
The Crossover Youth Practice Model (CYPM).
Georg
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.