Annotated Bibliography on Health Policy
Order Instructions
Unit 4
Annotated Bibliography on Health Policy
Instructions
For this assignment, you will create an annotated bibliography of resources related to your selected topic. This paper is not a formal paper but is structured as more of an outline. A title page and a reference page in APA style are required.
For this assignment, please follow these instructions:
Research and choose articles that discuss and examine a specific health policy that relates to your selected health issue.
The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to select the most relevant articles (research or evidence-based) from a peer reviewed and reliable journal or source.
Do not cite or use a website for this assignment.
Please note: A website is not considered an article. If you select a peer reviewed article published on a web site, use the correct citation. (See section 6.31 and 6.32 of your APA manual.)
Select five (5) articles from peer-reviewed journals that relate to your chosen issue and specific policy.
Reference each article in proper APA format and include the following information underneath each reference:
For each article write:
3 -5 sentence summary of the article
2 sentences about the purpose of the article
2 sentences why the article is credible for your topic
2 sentences explaining how you could use the article in your final project
Each annotated bibliography entry should be 250 words. Do not copy/paste the abstract for this assignment.
For an example of an annotated bibliography, please see the OWL website (Links to an external site.).
Complete this bibliography assignment and submit it to this assignment dropbox. This assignment is due by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.
Estimated time to complete: 4 hours
Rubric
NSG423 Paper Rubric 4 (1)
NSG423 Paper Rubric 4 (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
15 pts
5
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.
13.5 pts
4
Identifies a creative, focused and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.
12 pts
3
Identifies a focused and manageable/ doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.
10.5 pts
2
Identifies a topic that while manageable/ doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.
9 pts
1
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.
0 pts
0
Does not clearly identify a topics that is relative to the assignment.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
15 pts
5
Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/ approaches.
13.5 pts
4
Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
12 pts
3
Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/ approaches.
10.5 pts
2
Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.
9 pts
1
Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.
0 pts
0
Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process
10 pts
5
All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
9 pts
4
Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
8 pts
3
Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
7 pts
2
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.
6 pts
1
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
0 pts
0
The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
15 pts
5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
13.5 pts
4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
12 pts
3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
10.5 pts
2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
9 pts
1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts
0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
15 pts
5
States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.
13.5 pts
4
States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.
12 pts
3
States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.
10.5 pts
2
States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.
9 pts
1
States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.
0 pts
0
States an illogical conclusion from inquiry findings.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications
10 pts
5
Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.
9 pts
4
Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.
8 pts
3
Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.
7 pts
2
Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.
6 pts
1
Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.
0 pts
0
Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5 pts
5
The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
4.5 pts
4
The paper exhibits a stronger command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.
4 pts
3
The paper exhibits command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
3.5 pts
2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
3 pts
1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0 pts
0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
5 pts
5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
4.5 pts
4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
4 pts
3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3.5 pts
2
The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3 pts
1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0 pts
0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.
5 pts
Total Points: 90
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
