The deliverable(s)? you create will mirror (to some extent) the types of materials your professor will utilize in the course to deliver content in diverse ways?to foster interest & prob
The “deliverable(s)” you create will mirror (to some extent) the types of materials your professor will utilize in the course to deliver content in diverse ways—to foster interest & problem/trend/issue analysis, provide additional context, and appeal to varying learning styles, abilities, and preferences of students en route to global awareness, perspective taking, & global engagement.
The Dynamic Deliverable may consist of student-created, original items such as, but not limited to:
Podcasts
Poetry Series Composition
White paper for Recommended Policy Change to Those in Power
Narrative Short Story
Site-Visit Observation, Critique, Formal Improvement Recommendation
Final Project Proposal: Fracking. Definition, Environmental Concerns, & Facts
Final Project Proposal: Fracking. Definition, Environmental Concerns, & Facts
Introduction to the Problem
Problem to be addressed. Everyone knows that the use of fossil fuels is the origin of a wide range of problems that plague the future of our society, its economy, and the environment. Not only have we built practically almost our entire economic system on a fossil pillar that is seeing its reserves diminish every second. This type of energy is damaging the environment in many ways —global warming, air pollution…— and causing numerous social conflicts. However, consuming it is not the only source of harmful effects for our planet, the mere fact of extracting these fossil fuels can sometimes cause irreparable damage to Mother Nature herself. A perfect piece of evidence is fracking, also known as hydraulic fracturing, an exploitation system that leaves its mark on our earth's crust.
According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, mounting evidence shows that it poses serious threats to our health, environment, and climate future. (Denchak, 2019)
Problem subtopic. Fracking, also known as hydraulic fracturing, is a fuel harvesting process in which sand, water, and chemicals are pumped underground through drilled wells. This high-pressure fluid fractures shale rock formations, allowing drilling companies to access large amounts of oil and gas trapped within the rock. (Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA), n.d.)
Although the extraction of these raw materials has meant an economic boom for the countries that apply this technique, it has had an environmental cost. In countries such as the United States and Great Britain, the controversy between defenders (who exalt its advantages as an economic-productive procedure) and detractors (who point to the environmental toll and the effects on the health of the local and territorial population of the geographical areas
involved) is permanent and sometimes involve national governments. (British Broadcasting Corporation, 2022)
Possible Causes and Maintaining Forces
Cause. The first of the consequences of fracking has to do with water. The hydraulic fracturing process requires large amounts of water. A 2015 US Geological Survey estimated that a single well can use between 2,600 m³ and 36,000 m³ of water per well. Wells that employ horizontal drilling in shale gas zones use the largest amounts of water to operate.
Once the water is used for fracturing, it becomes contaminated with the chemicals used for this process. Some fracking companies send this wastewater deep underground, where they believe it is too far away to affect drinking water quality. Other companies send the water to treatment plants for purification and reuse.
Unfortunately, fracturing fluids contain some known carcinogens and endocrine disruptors, and treatment plants do not always remove them successfully. Some studies also suggest that wastewater affects the quality of drinking water over time. Although some of the water contamination could be the result of human error, there is concern that the problem is more widespread.
Due to trade secret laws, fracking companies are not required to report all of the chemicals they use during the extraction process. In addition, there is concern that the storage of sewage in the subsoil is putting pressure on geological faults and contributing to the increase in the number of earthquakes. (Petruzzello, n.d.)
Cause. Another consequence of fracking is air pollution. Although experts initially believed that natural gas was a cleaner fossil fuel than coal and oil, they are beginning to worry that it is worse. Fracking wells release large amounts of methane into the atmosphere,
which warms the planet for a decade before breaking down into carbon dioxide, another greenhouse gas.
Fracking wells are also known to emit volatile organic compounds. These compounds are toxic to humans and have been linked to asthma, cancer, and other serious illnesses. Some studies have also linked fracking pollution to birth defects, nervous system damage, and skin problems.
Unlike contaminated water, which can affect distant communities, air pollution is concentrated near drilling wells. To protect their health, many people have chosen to move when a fracking company drills nearby. Even with precautions, leaks are always possible, and chemicals from fracking wells are too well documented to be ignored.
Unfortunately, fracking companies often drill in low-income communities. Although there may be many reasons for this, the health hazards that come with the piercing process end up affecting those who have the least resources to defend themselves or change their circumstances. (Petruzzello, n.d.).
Cause. The third of the consequences of fracking has to do with the soil itself. If fracking wastewater is accidentally spilled or not properly purified, it can leach heavy metals and other toxic compounds into the ground. These chemicals can make the land less fertile and even poison the soil, affecting farmers.
Heavy soil is essential for a healthy environment as it filters water and provides a fertile environment conducive to growing healthy food. In any ecosystem, all other forms of life depend on healthy soil and thriving, diversified vegetation.
However, soil contaminated by hydraulic fracturing does the opposite of what healthy soil should do. It poisons the water instead of filtering it and can transfer heavy metals and
other toxins to the food that grows there. Livestock that eat these feeds can become ill or spread the toxins to consumers.
In some places, the treated wastewater is used to irrigate crops. Unfortunately, studies suggest that typical water treatment plants are not rigorous enough to remove the toxic chemicals present in fracking wastewater. Salt used for fracking can also destroy the fertility of farmland if it spills. (Petruzzello, n.d.).
Why the problem persists. The problem of fracking persists because, despite the environmental and health problems that it brings with it, it is defended for its purely economic and technological benefits that earn it the support of a large economic and financial sector that dilutes and hinders efforts to eliminate its practice.
According to economists and analysts, the exploration and exploitation of Unconventional Deposits would be essential to increase the energy reserves of the countries that stand out in their application. For this reason, they consider it vital to ensure their energy sustainability and promote social and economic development.
Among its national benefits can be cited the benefits for the nations:
· These operations encourage foreign direct investment, which has a positive impact on the dynamics of economic growth.
· As exploration confirms the potential of these nations, it is predicted that the levels of energy reserves could multiply.
· Higher oil production means that nations will have more money to finance social policies and development in their national territories.
· The energy self-sufficiency of these countries could be ensured for several more years, while consolidating their profiles as energy exporters.
Why the problem persists. From the regional point of view, it also brings substantial benefits, since once the production stage begins, many jobs are generated in the regions and the goods and services sector is spread out, which help to considerably lower the rates of unemployment.
In North Dakota (considering the United States of America) for example, the demand for employment has been so significant that there are cities, such as Williston, where the unemployment level is below 1%.
In addition, the development and production operations in Unconventional Deposits require many inputs, which must be provided by the local industries of goods and services. (Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA), n.d.)
Collusion between political and economic powers: under the Bush Junior administration and after incessant lobbying by transnational energy companies, several of the most important environmental protection laws in the US have been repealed, including the Drinking Water Law Safe, so that said law would not apply to fracking.
This provision has come to be called the "loophole" or the "Halliburton amendment", since the multinational Halliburton is one of the pioneers and one of the largest providers of hydraulic fracturing services in the US, and whose previous executive director was none other than that Dick Cheney, then Vice President of the United States when this specific legal exemption was approved.
Background and Justification
Prior attempts and previously proposed solutions.
Each country has developed its own mechanisms to control, regulate and limit the environmental impact of fracking in their territories.
In the United States, for example, we have the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), focused on working with states and other key stakeholders to help ensure that economic prosperity from unconventional oil and natural gas extraction does not occur at the expense of public resources, health, and environment.
According to their website, they have played a leading role in convening stakeholders and outreach to communities, tribes, individual citizens, trade associations, state and federal partners, industry, and environmental organizations that have a solid interest in their work and agency policies related to unconventional oil and natural gas extraction. (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2022)
Although the practice of fracking dates to the late 1940s, it was not until this century that true critical analyzes of the subject were made.
Oil and natural gas companies must comply with the requirements of various federal laws on environmental protection and public safety, even considering that the main regulatory authority on fracking within their borders is generally held by state governments. ( Ballotpedia, n.d.)
These laws include the law that limits air pollution called the Clean Air Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (which regulates the disposal of hazardous waste). There is also the Clean Water Law, in charge of regulating the discharge of pollutants into navigable waters, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Responsibility Law, which monitors the occurrence and cleanup of dangerous spills. ( Ballotpedia, n.d.)
Deficiencies in the solution paradigm. At the federal level, fracking regulations present too little pressure. In fact, in 2005, Congress exempted most types of fracking from the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, severely limiting protections for water quality. In April
2012, the US Environmental Protection Agency finalized new Clean Air Act rules called "New Source Performance Standards" that will limit air pollutants from fracked gas wells…but the rules did not cover oil wells, did not set limits on methane release, and did not take effect until 2015.
Even oil and gas companies that frack wells on federally managed public lands are rarely fined for violating environmental and safety regulations, and the few fines that are imposed are small compared to the profits from the company. industry, according to a report. 2012 Congressional Report. As a result, fracking regulation falls largely to the states.
Inadequate disclosure and poor protections are common features of state fracking laws. In Texas, for example, companies routinely exploit a trade secret loophole to avoid revealing what chemicals they are using in fracking fluid. Companies used the Texas trade secret exemption about 19,000 times in the first eight months of 2012.
Despite state fracking regulations, more than 100 cases of contamination have been confirmed by Pennsylvania state agencies in the last five years. (Center for Biological Diversity, n.d.)
Supplemental Material. It is necessary to consider the health repercussions that the practice of fracking can bring to the inhabitants and the community in general settled in territories annexed to the extraction sites that apply this procedure.
For example, some studies have tied living near fracking and unconventional natural gas development sites to higher chances for conditions like:
· Fatigue
· Low birth weight
· Premature births
· Migraines
· Certain types of cancer, like lymphoma and childhood leukemia
· Asthma
· Heart-related problems
· Elderly people dying sooner
· Birth defects (Starkman, 2022)
Newly Proposed Deliverable
Deliverable overview.
The primary objective of this activity is to create awareness regarding the obvious effects that the practice of fracking brings to nature, human beings, the planet and the forms of life in general that surround these drilling sites. With this, it is desired to build the necessary arguments to achieve the necessary popular pressure that can achieve the development of legislation that prohibits the continuity of this type of oil exploitation.
Through workshops and seminars, I intend to make visible the many reasons why it is necessary not only to become aware of this harmful process, but also the active participation of students, attendees and the general public in the promotion and dissemination of this content. , as well as achieving that as a community we can put pressure on our legislators, congressmen and representatives before governments at all levels with the aim of enacting laws that reject not only this hydrocarbon extraction procedure, but the redirection of national efforts towards others renewable and sustainable energy issues that replace the current energy matrix of the country.
Significance to the student.
The world (and in its greatest expression, the United States of America) is choosing to continue squeezing every liter of hydrocarbon out of the rocks while avoiding facing a problem that lies before us and is inescapable: the transition from an economy based on fossil fuels, towards societies with a low ecological footprint (particularly energy) and renewable and non-polluting technologies. It is necessary, finally, to assume that current model is unsustainable, first because fossil fuel reserves are increasingly scarce, and on the other hand because of all the environmental problems associated with their exploration, exploitation, production, and consumption.
Target audience.
Every living person regardless age, gender, spiritual beliefs, or specific circumstance shall be compromised with such important issue as the world we are leaving to future generations.
External dissemination platform.
Public and private spaces such as magazines, newspapers, websites, universities, and platforms compromised with community and nature welfare are excellent scenarios to address those issues.
Proposed length and justification
Using several valuable sources of information, the activity will be between 3 and 5 pages long.
Evaluation
Goal of new deliverable.
The creative and original use of the large number of sources of information and analysis regarding the subject of fracking and its detrimental influence will be essential in
achieving the audience's identification with the subject without making it monotonous or boring.
Success outcome measures. If the level of encouragement and rapport of the attendees with the given subject is reached, it will be possible to achieve the conviction that active action on local, regional, and national power and government instances is the appropriate mechanism to reverse the current trends regarding to the energy development of the nation.
Enhancement of global awareness
The current global demand for fossil fuels and the near depletion of conventional deposits has pushed the hydrocarbon industry to take advantage of new types of resources that have not been exploited until now. New drilling techniques have facilitated this movement, which has also had institutional support in many countries, blinded by the discovery of a new El Dorado. In this situation, the use of unconventional gas deposits through hydraulic fracturing is currently receiving the most attention. However, this technique entails serious environmental and public health risks, which both the operating companies and the institutions involved want to ignore. The institutional propaganda campaigns simply ignore them and disqualifies those who demand that the precautionary principle be applied. The effort of this task is focused on counteracting these campaigns.
Enhancement of global perspective-taking.
The dispute over the effects of fracking on health, climate change and the environment has been going on for a long time. However, it has been revitalized in the United States in recent days following the simultaneous publication of two conflicting reports. Both sides wield their powerful arguments each in favor of their cause.
Despite its supposed advantages, the truth is that it has come to demonstrate the fragility of ecosystems around the world, and this task aims to highlight those dangers that threaten societies regardless of where on the planet it is applied.
References
Ballotpedia. (n.d.). Ballotpedia.org. Retrieved from Fracking in the United States: https://ballotpedia.org/Fracking_in_the_United_States#Federal_fracking_policies
British Broadcasting Corporation. (2022, April 7). British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved from What is fracking and why is it controversial?: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-14432401
Center for Biological Diversity. (n.d.). Biologicaldiversity.org. Retrieved from Fracking in the United States: 10 Key Questions: https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/campaigns/fracking/10_questions.html
Denchak, M. (2019, April 19). Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. Retrieved from Fracking 101: https://www.nrdc.org/stories/fracking-101
Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA). (n.d.). Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA). Retrieved from Hydraulic Fracturing: https://www.ipaa.org/fracking/
Petruzzello, M. (n.d.). Britannica.com. Retrieved from Fracking: https://www.britannica.com/technology/fracking
Starkman, E. (2022, August 18). WebMD.com. Retrieved from What Are Fracking’s Possible Health Effects?: https://www.webmd.com/lung/fracking-health-effects
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2022, August 01). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from Unconventional Oil and Natural Gas Development: https://www.epa.gov/uog
1
,
3
Climate Change: Original Painting
Climate Change: Original Painting
Andrea Juan
For the past decade Juan, who is a professor of visual art at the National University of Tres de Febrero in Buenos Aires, has been journeying to Antarctica for month long periods to stage installations and performances across the empty continent. Though inspired by gloomy statistics, her work does not convey horrible notions of environmental disaster, and it's not over baring with ecological nostalgia, the vibrant material even has an undeniable joyful quality to them. When Argentinian artist Andrea Juan learned that the ice shelves of the Weddell Sea of the Antarctic coastline were melting, exposing the rare paleo botanical species that have lived there undisturbed for the past millennium, she leapt into action as only an artist can. Creating defensive looking sculptural creatures out of bundles of felt much larger and brighter than the animals inhabiting the disappearing sea floor along with bundles of tulle formed into psychedelic forms of toxic gasses, Juan arranged these across the ice's surface to draw attention to the ecological tragedy underway.
It is a lyrical gesture typical of the 50-year-old artist's work, which frequently extracts fact values from the hard and dry facts of scientific investigation. Since travelling to Antarctica for the first time in 2004, Juan has focused on the impact of climate change in Antarctic and its position as the driver of the entire planet’s weather and ocean systems biology. Not only has she traveled to the cold country she also pioneered Global Warming actions in her native Argentina. Gaining attention of the government on how the climate is currently affecting the country and persuading for a change. The immense and potentially changes foreshadowed by scientific enquiry have prompted her decade long commitment to other countries (Clark, 2016).
Ashley Cecil
Ashley is a Pittsburgh-based artist and illustrator specializing in hyper realistically rendered paintings of flora and fauna. Her clients include universities, Fortune 500 Companies, national nonprofits and private collectors. Her pieces lead her to developing an interest in the climate and its ongoing changes that has caused in the planet. Cecil love for nature has made her create paintings that are one of a kind, Ashley entered a contest that rocketed her carrier to the top. After requesting and reviewing proposals from several emerging artists from all over the nation, Oxfam America selected Ashley Cecil, who is a self-described painting activist to create a work that would illustrate how climate change affects poor communities, Cecil's gorgeous painting of two women in a drought baked landscape depicts one of them tipping out a bowl of dust instead of a bounty of grain, symbolizing the struggle of impoverished families to feed themselves in a world facing more and more climate-related impacts.
She wanted to show that the women are not harvesting crops the way they had hoped for. Which is a sad reality that many countries are currently dealing with (Urbschat, 2016).
Original Drawing/ Painting
After my intensive research on artists that were inspired by the climate change, I created a portrait myself that conveys my interpretation of the ongoing climate change affects to the planet and the countries in it. A large portion of my inspiration was Andrea Juan, her artwork and sculptures filled with colors automatically caught my attention, and that is what I was trying to accomplish with my piece. Grabbing the attention of the population will be the only way to convey a message. It needed to be entertaining yet modern so I went towards the direction of graffiti and pop art.
My piece is basically a planet that is melting due to the horrible heat that is affecting the world at this moment, I placed the sun around the entire planet to interpret that no matter where in the world you go the heat is still unbearable from locally here in Miami to across the ocean in China. My piece will catch the attention of a young hipster that likes art and graffiti to an older more sophisticated person that will wonder what is the meaning behind the drawing. I feel like I accomplished my purpose in grabbing the attention of my audience and conveying an important message. I started thinking on where I can demonstrate and display my art piece and the first place that came to mind is my job.
I am currently working with a doctor that specializes in Internal medicine and pulmonary Medicine in Miami. A beautiful city but filled with pollution and toxic air due to the overgrowing population. On Thursday morning before we started with our patients I placed my drawing in the first room were the patients first enters. I decided to make it interesting and purposely not place any label or caption on my piece, this way ill have the patients wondering on why that drawing is there. While I was taking a patients vital, the first patient asked me what’s the significance behind that drawing so I graciously explained to him about the horrible climate change that is affecting many countries. I put the drawing in every room I went into and about 85% of the patients asked me about the drawing, which shows that it is grabbing the attention of my audience. It was interesting seeing the reaction of the patients after they saw a random drawing in the room but after explaining to them they understood why it was there.
References
Clark, T. (n.d.). Trish Clark Gallery. Retrieved July 17, 2016, from http://trishclark.co.nz/artists/juan-andrea/
Urbschat, L. (2014, December 17). Only in Pittsburgh: The new work of artist Ashley Cecil. Retrieved July 17, 2016, from http://www.popcitymedia.com/features/cecilfeature_121714.aspx
image5.jpeg
image6.png
image7.png
image8.png
image9.png
image1.jpeg
image2.jpeg
image3.jpeg
image4.jpeg
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.