In this mini-case study, you have been assigned a task to evaluate the ?best access control for a hospital building. Evaluate which of these ?three types of access control systems: Discretio

SECURITY

C O M P U T E R 0 0 1 8 – 9 1 6 2 / 1 5 / $ 3 1 . 0 0 © 2 0 1 5 I E E E P U B L I S H E D B Y T H E I E E E C O M P U T E R S O C I E T Y F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 5 85

EDITOR JEFFREY VOAS National Institute of Standards and Technology, [email protected]

Traditionally, access control (AC) has been based on the identity of a user requesting execution of a capability to perform an operation (for exam- ple, read) on an object (for example, a file), either

directly or through predefined attribute types such as roles or groups assigned to that user. Practitioners have noted that this AC approach is often cumbersome to man- age given the need to associate capabilities directly to users or their roles or groups. In addition, the requester qualifiers of identity, groups, and roles are often insuf- ficient in expressing real-world AC policies. An alterna- tive is to grant or deny user requests based on arbitrary attributes of the user and selected attributes of the object, and environment conditions that could be globally rec- ognized and more relevant to the policies at hand. This approach is often referred to as attribute-based access control (ABAC).

ABAC: A FLEXIBLE ACCESS CONTROL MODEL ABAC is a logical AC model that controls access to objects by eval- uating rules against the attributes of entities (subject and object), op- erations, and the environment rel- evant to a request. ABAC enables more precise AC by allowing for a higher number of discrete inputs

into an AC decision and thereby providing a larger set of possible combinations of those variables to reflect a larger and more definitive set of possible rules to express policies, which are limited only by the computational language and the richness of the available attributes.

This flexibility enables creation of access rules with- out specifying individual relationships between each subject and each object. For example, a subject is as- signed a set of subject attributes upon employment, such as Nancy Smith is a Nurse Practitioner in the Cardiology Department. An object is assigned its object attributes upon creation, such as a folder with Medical Records of Heart Patients. Objects may receive their attributes ei- ther directly from the creator or as a result of automated scanning tools. The administrator or owner of an object creates an AC rule using attributes of subjects and objects to govern the set of allowable capabilities—for example,

Attribute-Based Access Control Vincent C. Hu, D. Richard Kuhn, and David F. Ferraiolo, National Institute of Standards and Technology

Attribute-based access control (ABAC) is a

flexible approach that can implement AC

policies limited only by the computational

language and the richness of the available

attributes, making it ideal for many distributed

or rapidly changing environments.

r2sec.indd 85 1/22/15 5:25 PMAuthorized licensed use limited to: University of Canberra. Downloaded on September 03,2021 at 10:50:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

86 C O M P U T E R W W W . C O M P U T E R . O R G / C O M P U T E R

SECURITY

all Nurse Practitioners in the Cardiol- ogy Department can View the Medical Records of Heart Patients.

Under ABAC, access decisions can change between requests simply by altering attribute values, without re- quiring changes to the subject/object relationships defining the underly- ing rule sets. This provides a more dynamic AC management capability and limits long-term maintenance re- quirements of object protections.

Further, ABAC enables object own- ers or administrators to apply AC policy without prior knowledge of the specific subject and for an unlimited number of subjects that might require access. As new subjects join the organization, rules and objects need not be modified, and as long as the subject is assigned the attributes necessary for access to the required objects—for example, all

Nurse Practitioners in the Cardiology Department are assigned those attri- butes—no modifications to existing rules or object attributes are required. This accommodation of the external (unanticipated) user is one of the pri- mary benefits of employing ABAC.1,2

As a result of this flexibility, ABAC has attracted interest across indus- try and government, and is the fast- est-growing AC model today.3 It has been integrated with other approaches, such as the International Committee for Information Technology Stan- dards (INCITS) standard for role-based access control,4 and has become the basis for an increasing range of prod- ucts. But beyond the basic scheme of associating attributes with subjects, objects, and environments, there has been little consistency among ABAC implementations.

IMPLEMENTING ABAC IN THE ENTERPRISE ENVIRONMENT Due to a lack of consensus on ABAC features, users can’t accurately assess the benefits and challenges associ- ated with the model. To help address this problem, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released Special Publication (SP) 800- 162, Guide to Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) Definition and Consid- erations.1 This document serves a two- fold purpose. First, it provides federal agencies with a definition of ABAC and a description of its functional components. Second, it describes planning, design, implementation, and operational considerations for employing ABAC within an enter- prise to improve information sharing while maintaining control of that in- formation. The guide focuses on the

Credential issuance

Enterprise policy manager

Enterprise identity/ credential manager

Subject attribute issuance

Subject

Enterprise subject attribute

administration point

Enterprise object attribute manager

Local object attribute administration point

Optional enterprise object attribute binding and validation service

Enterprise access control policy

repository

Enterprise access

control policy administration point

Af�liation

Etc. Clearance

Name Owner

Etc. Classi�cation TypeEnterprise subject

attribute sharing

Local subject attribute administration point

Hierarchical policy pushed to

subordinate organizations

Local subject attribute repository

Local subject attribute repository

Object attribute repository

Local access control policy repository

Object

Owner

Etc. Classi�cation Type

Af�liation

Etc. Clearance

Name

GroupRole

Rules

Decision Enforce

ABAC access control

mechanism

Environmental conditions Local access control policy

administration point

Set of available attributes for policy

development

Optional enterprise policy decision service

Figure 1. Attribute-based access control (ABAC) example. Adapted from V.C. Hu et al., Guide to Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) Definition and Considerations, NIST Special Publication 800-162, Nat’l Institute of Standards and Technology, Jan. 2014.

r2sec.indd 86 1/22/15 5:53 PMAuthorized licensed use limited to: University of Canberra. Downloaded on September 03,2021 at 10:50:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 5 87

challenges of implementing ABAC rather than on balancing the cost and effectiveness of other capabilities ver- sus ABAC.

When deployed across an enter- prise to increase information shar- ing among diverse organizations, ABAC implementations can become complex, requiring an attribute man- agement infrastructure, machine- enforceable policies, and an array of functions that support access deci- sions and policy enforcement. As Fig- ure 1 shows, in addition to the basic policy, attribute, and AC mechanism requirements, the enterprise must support management functions for enterprise policy development and distribution, enterprise identity and subject attributes, subject attribute sharing, enterprise object attributes, authentication, and AC mechanism deployment and distribution.

Enabling these capabilities re- quires careful consideration of nu- merous factors that will influence the design, security, and interoperability of an enterprise ABAC solution. These

factors can be summarized around a set of activities:

› establish the business case for ABAC implementation;

› understand the operational requirements and overall ABAC enterprise architecture;

› establish or refine business pro- cesses to support ABAC;

› develop and acquire an interop- erable set of ABAC capabilities; and

› operate with efficient ABAC processing.

NIST SP 800-162 helps ABAC sys- tem planners, architects, managers, and implementers carry out these ac- tivities in four phases. The initiation phase includes building the business case for deploying ABAC capabilities; scalability, feasibility, and perfor- mance requirements; and developing operational requirements and archi- tecture. The acquisition/development phase includes business process gen- eration and deployment preparation,

system development and solution acquisition considerations, and other enterprise ABAC capabilities. The implementation/assessment phase in- cludes attribute caching, attribute source minimization, and ABAC in- terface specifications. Finally, the op- erations/maintenance phase includes availability of quality ABAC data.

ATTRIBUTE ASSURANCE The metadata of ABAC attributes communicate aspects that are im- portant for attribute standardiza- tion. By coupling a common set of mandatory and optional metadata with attribute assertions, ABAC sys- tems can query attribute information to make their own risk-based deci- sions, especially when delivered via a broker connected to many systems.

In general, attribute metadata fall into three categories:

› Accuracy establishes the policy and technical underpinnings for semantically and syntactically correct use of these attributes

TABLE 1. Level of attribute assurance (LOAA) mappings example.

LOAA Accuracy Integrity Availability

1 Attributes are properly verified for veracity through provision and management.

Secure attribute repository.

Secure communication between attribute providers (APs) and relying parties (RPs).

Attribute refresh frequency meets the system performance requirement.

2 Includes level 1.

Documented rule or standards for attribute value assignment and definition (syntax and semantic rule).

Includes level 1.

Dedicated attribute repositories.

Includes level 1.

Attribute caching during runtime meets the system performance requirement.

3 Includes level 2.

Attributes cover all of the organization’s protection policy requirements (semantically complete).

Includes level 2.

Encrypted attribute values and communications between APs and RPs.

Includes level 2.

Failover or backup attributes support.

4 Includes Level 3.

Attributes under federated or unified governance.

Includes level 3.

Formal rules or policy (or standards) for create, update, modify, and delete attributes.

Includes level 3.

Log for attribute changes and access.

r2sec.indd 87 1/22/15 5:25 PMAuthorized licensed use limited to: University of Canberra. Downloaded on September 03,2021 at 10:50:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

88 C O M P U T E R W W W . C O M P U T E R . O R G / C O M P U T E R

SECURITY

and environmental conditions, and ensures that the reported attributes are trustworthy, based on the trust established in the measurement and reporting processes.

› Integrity considers different standards and protocols used for secure sharing of attributes be- tween systems in order to avoid compromising the integrity and confidentiality of the attributes or exposing vulnerabilities in at- tribute provider (AP) or relying party (RP) systems or entities.

› Availability ensures that the up- date and retrieval of attributes support the RP. In addition, attribute repositories’ failover and backup capability must be considered. Note that some attri- butes might change regularly or over time.

An AP is any person or system that provides subject, object (or resource), or environmental condition attributes regardless of transmission method. The AP could be the original authori- tative source or receiving information from an authoritative source for re- packing and storing-and-forwarding to the ABAC system. Attribute values can be human generated (for example, an employee database) or derived from formulas (for example, a credit score). Regardless of the attribute source, the system should ensure that the attri- bute value received from an AP is ac- curately associated with the subject,

object, or environmental condition to which it applies.2 Table 1 illustrates example levels of attribute assurance (LOAA) based on the accuracy, integ- rity, and availability properties.

A ttribute-based access control is a flexible approach that can implement AC policies limited

only by the computational language and the richness of the available at- tributes. This flexibility enables the greatest breadth of subjects to ac- cess the greatest breadth of objects without specifying individual rela- tionships between each subject and each object, making ABAC ideal for many distributed or rapidly changing environments.

ABAC has the potential to dramat- ically improve AC in modern appli- cations such as e-commerce and the Internet of Things. In the meantime, a consensus definition of ABAC is needed, and work remains to be done in assuring attribute accuracy and re- liability. For more information on on- going efforts, see http://csrc.nist.gov /projects/abac/index.html.

REFERENCES 1. V.C. Hu et al., Guide to Attribute Based

Access Control (ABAC) Definition and Considerations, NIST Special Pub- lication 800-162, Nat’l Institute of Standards and Technology, Jan. 2014; http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs /specialpublications/NIST.sp.800 -162.pdf.

2. V.C. Hu, D.F. Ferraiolo, and D.R. Kuhn, Assessment of Access Control Systems, NIST Interagency Report 7316, Nat’l Institute of Standards and Technol- ogy, Mar. 2006; http://csrc.nist.gov /publications/nistir/7316/NISTIR -7316.pdf.

3. Avatier Corp., “Leveraging Today’s Megatrends to Drive the Future of Identity Management,” video presen- tation, Gartner Identity and Access Management (IAM) Summit, 2012; www.avatier.com/products /identity-management/resources /gartner-iam-2020-predictions.

4. D.R. Kuhn, E.J. Coyne, and T.R. Weil, “Adding Attributes to Role Based Access Control,” Computer, vol. 43, no. 6, 2010, pp. 79–81.

VINCENT C. HU is a computer scien- tist in the Computer Security Division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Contact him at [email protected] nist.gov.

D. RICHARD KUHN is a project leader and computer scientist in the Computer Security Division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Contact him at [email protected] nist.gov.

DAVID F. FERRAIOLO is a computer scientist and manages the Secure Systems and Applications Group in the Computer Security Division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Contact him at [email protected]

IEEE Internet Computing reports emerging tools, technologies, and applications implemented through the Internet to support a worldwide computing environment.

For submission information and author guidelines, please visit www.computer.org/internet/author.htm

Engineering and Applying the Internet

r2sec.indd 88 1/22/15 5:25 PMAuthorized licensed use limited to: University of Canberra. Downloaded on September 03,2021 at 10:50:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

Readings/Best Practices, Procedures and Methods for Access Control Management.pdf

5

Diagram 1.2 displays the process of identification, authentication and authorization through the use of a flow chart that can grant or deny access based on the information given and the rules it has been supplied:

1.5 Accountability Finally in order to enforce the misuse of policy once access has been granted, or prevent repeated malicious access attempts there must be some form of accountability. Accountability can use various methods to record or capture events for additional review. This event log can include every access request, both positive and negative, subject login times and locations, subject actions upon login, etc. This information is stored and can be used for investigative purposes or for reporting of usage statistics for audit. Account

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.