October 11, 2022

NURS 6053 Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3) Papers

–Downloads–Download Video w/CCDownload AudioDownload Transcript

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Moral Leadership [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Learning Objectives – NURS 6053 Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3) Papers

Students will:

Analyze the impact of competing needs of workforce, resources, and patients on policy development
Analyze the impact of competing needs on healthcare issues/stressors
Analyze policies and practices for healthcare issues/stressors
Critique organizational policies and practices for ethical considerations
Recommend policy or practice changes to balance competing needs and ethical considerations

Due By	Assignment
Week 3, Days 1–2	Read the Learning Resources. Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 3, Day 3	Post your initial Discussion post. Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 3, Days 4-5	Review peer Discussion posts. Compose your peer Discussion responses. Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 3, Day 6	Post two peer Discussion responses.
Week 3, Day 7	Deadline to submit your assignment.

Photo Credit: on_WAL_CBLE0001_er1_EN.mov – Freeze frame

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTIONS

Learning Resources – NURS 6053 Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3) Papers

Required Readings

American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: Author. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/coe-view-only

Note: Review all, with special attention to “Provision 6” (pp. 23–26).

Kelly, P., & Porr, C. (2018). Ethical nursing care versus cost containment: Considerations to enhance RN practice. OJIN: Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1), Manuscript 6. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No01Man06. Retrieved from http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-23-2018/No1-Jan-2018/Ethical-Nursing-Cost-Containment.html

Milliken, A. (2018). Ethical awareness: What it is and why it matters. OJIN: Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1), Manuscript 1. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No01Man01. Retrieved from http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-23-2018/No1-Jan-2018/Ethical-Awareness.html

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Ethical, Moral, and Legal Leadership [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

–Downloads–Download Video w/CCDownload AudioDownload Transcript

Laureate Education (Producer). (2009b). Working with Individuals [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.NURS 6053 Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3) Papers

–Downloads–Download Video w/CCDownload AudioDownload Transcript

Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues

Quite often, nurse leaders are faced with ethical dilemmas, such as those associated with choices between competing needs and limited resources. Resources are finite, and competition for those resources occurs daily in all organizations.

For example, the use of 12-hour shifts has been a strategy to retain nurses. However, evidence suggests that as nurses work more hours in a shift, they commit more errors. How do effective leaders find a balance between the needs of the organization and the needs of ensuring quality, effective, and safe patient care?

In this Discussion, you will reflect on a national healthcare issue and examine how competing needs may impact the development of polices to address that issue.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and think about the national healthcare issue/stressor you previously selected for study in Module 1.
Reflect on the competing needs in healthcare delivery as they pertain to the national healthcare issue/stressor you previously examined.

By Day 3 of Week 3

Post an explanation of how competing needs, such as the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients, may impact the development of policy. Then, describe any specific competing needs that may impact the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected. What are the impacts, and how might policy address these competing needs? Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 3

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by providing additional thoughts about competing needs that may impact your colleagues’ selected issues, or additional ideas for applying policy to address the impacts described.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 3 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 3

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 3 Discussion

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.NURS 6053 Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3) Papers
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.NURS 6053 Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3) Papers
Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTIONS

Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Competing needs arise within any organization as employees seek to meet their targets and leaders seek to meet company goals. As a leader, successful management of these goals requires establishing priorities and allocating resources accordingly.

Within a healthcare setting, the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients are often in conflict. Mandatory overtime, implementation of staffing ratios, use of unlicensed assisting personnel, and employer reductions of education benefits are examples of practices that might lead to conflicting needs in practice.

Leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution through policies, action, and inaction. In this Assignment, you will further develop the white paper you began work on in Module 1 by addressing competing needs within your organization.

To Prepare:

Review the national healthcare issue/stressor you examined in your Assignment for Module 1, and review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
Identify and review two evidence-based scholarly resources that focus on proposed policies/practices to apply to your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post regarding competing needs.

The Assignment (4-5 pages):

Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Add a section to the paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the following:

Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.
Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.
Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide two scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.

By Day 7 of Week 3

Submit your revised paper.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 3 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3

To submit your Assignment:

Week 3 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next Module:

Module 3

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Add a section to the paper you submitted in Module 1. In 4–5 pages, address the following: · Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor.	23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response accurately and clearly identifies at least two competing needs impacting the healthcare issue/stressor selected.NURS 6053 Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3) Papers	20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response identifies at least two competing needs impacting the healthcare issue/stressor selected.	18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response identifies at least two competing needs impacting the healthcare issue/stressor selected that is vague or inaccurate.	0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response describes at least two competing needs impacting the healthcare issue/stressor selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
· Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor. · Critique the policy for ethical considerations and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.	27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail a relevant policy or practice in an organization that may influence the healthcare issue/stressor selected. The response accurately and thoroughly critiques in detail the policy for ethical considerations and explains in detail the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.	24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response accurately describes a relevant policy or practice in an organization that may influence the healthcare issue/stressor selected. The response accurately critiques the policy for ethical considerations and explains the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.NURS 6053 Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3) Papers	21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response describes a relevant policy or practice in an organization that may influence the healthcare issue/stressor selected that is vague or inaccurate. The response critiques the policy for ethical considerations and explains the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics that is vague or inaccurate.	0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response describes a relevant policy or practice in an organization that may influence the healthcare issue/stressor selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response critiques the policy for ethical considerations and explains the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
· Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples. · Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies and provide two scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.	27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response provide one or more accurate, clear, and thorough recommendations for policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Specific and accurate examples are provided. Accurate and detailed evidence is cited that informs the healthcare issue/stressor selected and a specific synthesis of at least two outside scholarly resources in full support of the policy or practice recommendations is provided. The response integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources that fully support the healthcare issue/stressor selected.	24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response provides one or more recommendations for policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Specific examples may be provided. Evidence is cited that informs the healthcare issue/stressor selected and a synthesis of at least one outside scholarly resource that may support the policy or practice recommendations is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2 or 3 course-specific resources that may support the healthcare issue/stressor selected.	21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response provides one or more recommendations for policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies that is vague or inaccurate. Examples may be provided. Vague or inaccurate evidence is cited from 2 or 3 resources that informs the healthcare issue/stressor selected and may support the policy or practice recommendations provided.	0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response provides one or more recommendations for policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Examples are missing. Vague and inaccurate evidence is cited that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and may include at least 1 scholarly resource that vaguely and inaccurately supports the policy practice recommendations is provided, or is missing.NURS 6053 Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3) Papers
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.	3.5 (3.5%)</sp Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers. Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper? Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials. We write plagiarism Free Content Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties. Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions. NURS 503 HEALTHCARE QUALITY AND SAFETY PAPER NURS 6053 Week07 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment Related Posts Uncategorized Explore important developments in the history of epidemiology and population health Uncategorized Select two to three organizations for consideration for your capstone project’s feasibility study Uncategorized Impulse control and conduct disorder Why Choose Us Best Essay Writing Services- Get Quality Homework Essay Paper at Discounted Prices At the risk of sounding immodest, we must point out that we have an elite team of writers. Ours isn’t a collection of individuals who are good at searching for information on the Internet and then conveniently re-writing the information obtained to barely beat Plagiarism Software. Who can’t do that? Our writers have strong academic backgrounds with regards to their areas of writing. A paper on History will only be handled by a writer who is trained in that field. A paper on health care can only be dealt with by a writer qualified on matters health care. Thesis papers will only be handled by Masters’ Degree holders while Dissertations will strictly be handled by PhD holders. With such a system, you needn’t worry about the quality of work. Quality isn’t just an option, it is the only option. We don’t just employ writers, we hire professionals. We have writers spread into all fields including but not limited to Philosophy, Economics, Business, Medicine, Nursing, Education, Technology, Tourism and Travels, Leadership, History, Poverty, Marketing, Climate Change, Social Justice, Chemistry, Mathematics, Literature, Accounting and Political Science. Our writers are also well trained to follow client instructions as well adhere to various writing conventional writing structures as per the demand of specific articles. They are also well versed with citation styles such as APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and Oxford which come handy during the preparation of academic papers. They also have unrivalled skill in writing language be it UK English or USA English considering that they are native English speakers. You also needn’t worry about logical flow of thought, sentence structure as well as proper use of phrases. Our writers are also not the kind to decorate articles with unnecessary filler words. We respect your money and most importantly your trust in us. In writing, we will be precise and to the point and fill the paper with content as opposed to words aimed at beating the word count. Our shift-system also ensures that you get fresh writers each time you send a job. This helps overcome occupational hazards brought about by fatigue. Hence, quality will consistently be at the top. From our writers, you expect; good quality work, friendly service, timely deliveries, and adherence to client’s demands and specifications. Once you’ve submitted your writing requests, you can go take a stroll while waiting for our all-star team of writers and editors to submit top quality work. How Our Website Works Get an Essay from Us College Essays is the biggest affiliate and testbank for WriteDen. We hire writers from all over the world with an aim to give the best essays to our clients. Our writers will help you write all your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors who read each paper from our writers just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. Step 1 To make an Order you only need to click ORDER NOW and we will direct you to our Order Page. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline. Deadline range from 6 hours to 30 days. Step 2 Once done with writing your paper we will upload it to your account on our website and also forward a copy to your email. Step 3 Upon receiving your paper, review it and if any changes are needed contact us immediately. We offer unlimited revisions at no extra cost. Is it Safe to use our services? We never resell papers on this site. Meaning after your purchase you will get an original copy of your assignment and you have all the rights to use the paper. Pricing and Discounts Our price ranges from $8-$14 per page. If you are short of Budget, contact our Live Support for a Discount Code. All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure. Please note we do not have prewritten answers. We need some time to prepare a perfect essay for you. Recent Posts Consider the many facets of this question and weigh the positives of smartphones with the negatives According to the behaviorists Watson and Skinner, we could never know what is really going on in the mind AOS 492- Financial Literacy for Leaders Identify nursing problems implicit in the nursing research study and the QI DNP project What is the characteristic (diagnostic) features of homicidal cut-throat? College Pal All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions College pals.com Privacy Policy 2010-2018

NURS 6053 Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3) Papers