Clinical Reasoning Report Paper
Clinical Reasoning Report Paper
Clinical Reasoning Report Paper
Task Description
Objective/Criteria Performance Indicators HD DN CR PP NN
1. Consider the patient situation and collect cues/information • Demonstrate a
beginner’s level understanding and application of clinical reasoning cycle.
5 marks
• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.
• Correctly determines all cues that are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.
• Differentiates between subjective and objective cues.
• Correctly identifies all subjective and objective cues.
• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.
• Determines most cues that are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.
• Correctly identifies most subjective and objective cues.
• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.
• Determines many cues which are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.
• Correctly identifies many subjective and objective cues.
• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.
• Determines some cues that are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.
• Correctly identifies some subjective and objective cues.
• Does not develop an initial impression of the person in the case.
• Lists cues provided in the case but cannot determine which cues are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.
• Does not identify or incorrectly identifies subjective and objective cues.
2. Process information • Demonstrate a
beginner’s level understanding and application of clinical reasoning cycle, and
• able to apply relevant knowledge to demonstrate a clear understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the patient’s context.
20 marks
• Identifies all relevant normal and abnormal cues.
• Analyses the cues that have been collected.
• Narrows down all the important information about the cues collected.
• Demonstrates an outstanding understanding of the assessment findings and patient’s condition in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.
• Compares the current situation to the previous situation including patient’s past history.
• Forms a logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.
• Identifies all relevant normal and abnormal cues.
• Analyses some of the cues that have been collected.
• Narrows down most of the important information about the cues collected.
• Demonstrates an understanding of the assessment findings and patient’s condition in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.
• Compares the current situation to the previous situation.
• Forms a logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.
• Identifies most normal and abnormal cues.
• Narrows down some important information about the cues collected.
• Demonstrates some understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.
• Compares the current situation to the previous situation.
• Attempts to form a logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.
• Identifies some normal and abnormal cues.
• Demonstrates a limited understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.
• Some attempt at comparing the current situation to the previous situation.
• Forms a limited logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.
• Does not identify normal or abnormal cues.
• Narrowing down of important cues has not occurred.
• Does not demonstrate an understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.
• No comparison of the current or previous situation.
• No logical opinion is formed.
CNA152: Health Assessment 1 Assessment Task 2B – Clinical reasoning report (40%)
2
3. Critically reflect, at a beginner’s level, on your skills performance, using scholarly sources to support your reflection. 10 marks
• Demonstrates comprehensive reflection and insight.
• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.
• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and explains: a) what you should do differently next time, and b) why this is important for promoting a positive patient outcome.
• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice with relevant connections to the current literature.
• Demonstrates solid reflection and insight throughout.
• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.
• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and explains: a) what you should do differently next time, and b) why this is important for promoting a positive patient outcome.
• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice with some connections to the current literature.
• Demonstrates some reflection and insight throughout.
• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.
• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and explains what you should do differently next time.
• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice with limited connections to the current literature.
• The reflection is mostly a description of the learning experience but some attempt to provide justification for events or actions which have happened.
• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.
• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and briefly explains what you should do differently next time.
• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice.
• The reflection provides a description of the skills performance only.
• The reflection does not identify any actions or identifies irrelevant actions to improve the situation (the practical skills).
4. Writes in a structured, succinct and well informed manner with references to appropriate academic literature, current research and evidence- based clinical practice guidelines. Using correct Harvard referencing style 5 marks
• A high level of academic writing with strong evidence of planning.
• The paper is exceptionally logical, insightful and balanced and is consistently expressed in a clear and fluent manner.
• Accurately references all sources using the Harvard style.
• Academic writing with strong evidence of planning.
• The paper is logical and balanced and expressed in a clear and fluent manner.
• Accurately references the majority sources using the Harvard style
• Academic writing with clear evidence of planning with a logical flow.
• Discussion is generally expressed in a clear and fluent manner.
• Accurately references the majority sources using the Harvard style.
• Academic writing using coherent and partly cohesive expression.
• Semi-structured using some academic literature to support the paper.
• Accurately references most sources using the Harvard style.
• Multiple punctuation, sentence structure and formatting errors which impact on readability.
• Non-academic sources are utilised. • Inaccurate referencing style or
does not use the Harvard style. • Uses few or no references to
support work.
Clinical Reasoning Report Paper
Assessment Task 2B: Clinical reasoning report
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.