Case Study: MN553 Advanced Pharmacology
Case Study: MN553 Advanced Pharmacology
Case Study: MN553 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 9 Case Study
“Prescribed Drugs with CAMs”
Student Name
Date of Submission
ORDER COMPREHESIVE SOLUTION PAPERS ON Case Study: MN553 Advanced Pharmacology
This paper addresses a pharmacological management plan for Mr. NX, including consideration of possible contraindications for CAMs, prescriptive, and non-prescriptive recommendations for management of acute pain and other ongoing disease processes, followed by evaluation strategies.
Pharmacological Management Plan
CAMs Contraindicated with Current Prescriptions
CAMs Contraindicated with Diagnoses
Prescription for Back Pain
Changes in Prescribed Drugs
Follow-Up Evaluations
Time-Frame
Strategies for Evaluating Side/Adverse Effects
Strategies for Evaluating Effectiveness
References (examples)
Romm, A. (2011). Overprescribing of antibiotics for children’s upper respiratory infections. Alternative options to consider. Alternative and Complementary Therapies, 17(6), 306–309. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.lib.kaplan.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2011411466&site=eds-live
Singh, J. A., Furst, D. E., Bharat, A., Curtis, J. R., Kavanaugh, A. F., Kremer, J. M.,…Saag, K. G. (2012). Update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Research and Quality, National Guideline Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=36892&search=rheumatoid+arthritis
Assignment Rubric
| Unit 9 assignment grading rubric. | |||||||
| Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points = | 80 | ||||||
| Content Rubric | Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| 0 – 1.9 | 2 – 2.9 | 3 – 3.9 | 4 | ||||
| Content Quality | Submission does not address most of the assignment requirements and/or indicates no understanding of critical concepts. | Includes some of the assignment requirements. Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of some critical concepts. | Includes all assignment requirements with minor errors/omissions, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly. Displays understanding of most critical concepts. | Includes all assignment requirements, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly with details and examples where appropriate. Displays complete understanding of critical concepts. | 90% | 0.00 | |
| Resources | Does not include any resources (0) or sources utilized are not relevant and credible sources of information(1). | Not all sources utilized are relevant and/or credible and/or does not meet the required number of sources. | Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets the required number and types of resources. | Supports opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets or exceeds the required number and types of resources. | 10% | 0.00 | |
| Content Score | 0 | ||||||
| Writing Deduction Rubric | Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| 0-1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| Grammar & Punctuation | The overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult. | Several confusing sentences or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion. | A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation. | There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences. | 4 | 35% | 1.40 |
| Spelling | The many misspelled words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with the readability. | Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few places. | Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear. | A few misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of the paper. | 4 | 35% | 1.40 |
| Order of Ideas & Length Requirement | Paper has some good information or research, but it does not follow assignment directions and is lacking in overall organization and content. | The order of information is confusing in several places and this organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper. However, the paper has a generally discernible purpose and follows assignment directions overall. | The order of information is confusing in a few places and the lack of organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper in a minor way. | The overall order of the information is clear and contributes to the meaning of assignment. There is one paragraph or a sentence or two that are out of place or other minor organizational issues. A few sentences may be long and hard to understand. Meets length requirements. | 4 | 20% | 0.80 |
| APA | There is some attempt at APA formatting and citing. There are one or more missing parts such as the cover page or references list. Citation information may be missing. Citation mistakes make authorship unclear. | This is an attempt use APA formatting and citing. There are both in-text citations and reference listings. Citation information may be missing or incorrect (i.e. Websites listed as in-text or reference citations). There is an attempt to cite all outside sources in at least one place. Authorship is generally clear. | There is an overall attempt at APA formatting and citation style. All sources appear to have some form of citation both in the text and on a reference list. There are some formatting and citation errors. Citations generally make authorship clear. | There is a strong attempt to cite all sources using APA style. Minor paper formatting errors such as a misplaced running head or margins may occur. Minor in-text citation errors such as a missing page number or a misplaced date may occur. Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear. | 4 | 10% | 0.40 |
| Writing Deduction | 0.00 | ||||||
| Final Score | 0.00 | ||||||
| Percentage | 0.00% | ||||||
| Feedback: |
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
