Provide a brief synopsis of?the?health disparities and social determinants of health. Provide a brief?synopsis?of the Affordable care Act Explain your selection of a policy?why, as a?policy

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Exceeds Expectation

90%–100%

Meets Expectation

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Needs Improvement

0%–69%

Name: SOCW_6361_Week6_Assignment_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

Exceeds Expectation

90%–100%

Meets Expectation

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Needs Improvement

0%–69%

Submit a proposal that addresses the following:

Provide a brief synopsis of the social problem you selected in Week 2.

Provide a brief synopsis of the policy you selected in Week 4.

Explain your selection of a policy—why, as a policy advocate, did you select this speci�c policy to promote change regarding the social problem?

8.1 (9%) – 9 (10%)

Meets expectations and exceeds by drawing connections between prior social work experience and goals for advocacy in the selection of a policy. Two or more scholarly resources are used to support response.

7.2 (8%) – 8.01 (8.9%)

The response contains a clear and concise synopsis of the social problem selected in Week 2 and of the policy selected in Week 4.

The response accurately incorporates concepts from the Learning Resources or relevant topics from other research to explain why the policy was selected as a vehicle for policy advocacy and social change. At least one scholarly resource is used to support response.

6.3 (7%) – 7.11 (7.9%)

The response provides a synopsis, but the required explanation is vaguely developed or does not clearly set a foundation for advocacy.

0 (0%) – 6.21 (6.9%)

The response fails to or does not attempt to address all aspects of the prompt.

Exceeds Expectation

90%–100%

Meets Expectation

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Needs Improvement

0%–69%

Identify the person or group who enacted the policy and explain their motivation or reason for advocating for this policy. How does the reason di�er from your own advocacy and change goals?

16.2 (18%) – 18 (20%)

Meets expectations and exceeds by incorporating relevant and/or added examples to highlight di�erent motivations for advocacy and social change.

14.4 (16%) – 16.02 (17.8%)

The response accurately identi�es the person or group who enacted the policy and proposes logical motivations or reasons for developing this policy.

The response compares how that reason di�ers from student’s advocacy and change goals.

12.6 (14%) – 14.22 (15.8%)

The response attempts to explain the motivation or reason for advocating this policy for the identi�ed person or group, but the connections are vague or inaccurate in parts.

The response attempts to make the required comparison, but the details between di�erent motivations are not clearly de�ned.

0 (0%) – 12.42 (13.8%)

The response fails to or does not attempt to explore the motivations for developing the policy. Response does not demonstrate connection to the Learning Resources.

Exceeds Expectation

90%–100%

Meets Expectation

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Needs Improvement

0%–69%

Describe the ways in which the policy impacts the populations and discuss the consequences, intended and unintended. Hint: Build on your answer to the following part of your Week 4 Assignment: Explain how this policy a�ects clients you might see in a clinical setting and why, as a clinical social worker, it would be important to advocate for change.

20.25 (22.5%) – 22.5 (25%)

Meets expectations and exceeds by enhancing or expanding upon the evaluation of the policy’s development or impacts on the population with professional experiences and examples. Two or more scholarly resources are used to support response.

18 (20%) – 20.02 (22.25%)

The response accurately incorporates concepts from the Learning Resources or relevant topics from other research to analyze the consequences, intended and unintended, of the policy on speci�c populations. At least one scholarly resource is used to support response.

15.75 (17.5%) – 17.77 (19.75%)

The response attempts to explore the consequences of the policy, but the impacts and/or the relationship to the marginalized populations is/are unclear.

0 (0%) – 15.53 (17.25%)

The response fails to or does not attempt to explore the consequences of the policy.

Describe your initial work to change the policy (i.e., plan for social advocacy).

20.25 (22.5%) – 22.5 (25%)

Meets expectations and exceeds by drawing connections between the social problem, population, and speci�c components of the policy to detail the plan.

18 (20%) – 20.02 (22.25%)

Response incorporates details from the social problem or population to propose an initial plan for social advocacy.

15.75 (17.5%) – 17.77 (19.75%)

The response attempts to describe a plan, but the steps or speci�c actions are vague or missing.

0 (0%) – 15.53 (17.25%)

The response fails to or does not attempt to describe a plan.

Exceeds Expectation

90%–100%

Meets Expectation

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Needs Improvement

0%–69%

Competency – Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice

4.05 (4.5%) – 4.5 (5%)

Student’s social advocacy plan demonstrates exceptional ability to apply understanding of social justice to advocate for human rights at the policy level. This is demonstrated through a detailed plan that provides speci�c actionable steps that clearly aligns with social justice goals.

3.6 (4%) – 4 (4.45%)

Student’s social advocacy plan demonstrates clear ability to apply understanding of social justice to advocate for human rights at the policy level.

3.15 (3.5%) – 3.56 (3.95%)

Student’s social advocacy plan demonstrates some ability to apply understanding of social justice to advocate for human rights at the policy level.

0 (0%) – 3.1 (3.45%)

Student’s social advocacy plan demonstrates no or little ability to apply understanding of social justice to advocate for human rights at the policy level.

Writing 12.15 (13.5%) – 13.5 (15%)

The paper meets length requirements, meets expectations, is generally error free (two or fewer), and further exceeds by showcasing an exemplary scholarly voice to develop its message or communicate ideas.

The paper appropriately paraphrases

10.8 (12%) – 12.02 (13.35%)

The paper meets length requirements and is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, are minimal (three to �ve), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays e�ective organization

9.45 (10.5%) – 10.66 (11.85%)

The paper does not meet length requirements and is either somewhat too short or too long. The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (�ve to 10) and

0 (0%) – 9.31 (10.35%)

The paper does not meet length requirements and is either signi�cantly too short or too long. The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, are pervasive (11+), and interfere with

Exceeds Expectation

90%–100%

Meets Expectation

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Needs Improvement

0%–69%

sources, using one or fewer quotes. Presents polished APA Style. Citations, reference list, and paper formatting are generally error free (two or fewer).

Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

and focus to communicate ideas.

The paper appropriately paraphrases sources. The paper may use two to three short quotes but provides appropriate references, consistently documents sources in APA Style, and uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with a few minimal errors (three to �ve).

The reference list is complete and contains only minimal errors (three to �ve). Paper formatting is appropriate. There is a clear distinction between cited content and original thought.

Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective,

occasionally interfere with the message. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus.

The paper may rely on four short quotes or one to two long quotes (more than 40 words) and/or does not su�ciently paraphrase material from other resources into student's own words. The paper attempts to document sources in APA Style and citations are present but contain frequent APA errors or omissions.

A reference list is provided but is incomplete and/or contains frequent APA errors. The

the message. The paper is not organized or lacks focus.

The paper relies excessively on quoting (�ve or more quotes) or three or more long quotes (more than 40 words), and/or uses quoted material without paraphrasing or referencing the source of the material. Little or no attempt is made to document sources in APA Style.

Citations are infrequent or missing, and a reference list is not provided. Little or no attempt has been made to format the paper in APA Style.

There is no distinction between cited content and original

Exceeds Expectation

90%–100%

Meets Expectation

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Needs Improvement

0%–69%

unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

paper formatting may be incorrect (e.g., single-spaced or without a title page) and occasionally lacks a clear distinction between cited content and original thought.

thought.

Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity.

Name: SOCW_6361_Week6_Assignment_Rubric

EXIT