OVERVIEW OF QUALITY IN HEALTHCARE, NUR-630

OVERVIEW OF QUALITY IN HEALTHCARE, NUR-630

OVERVIEW OF QUALITY IN HEALTHCARE

The purpose of this assignment is to apply the concepts you have learned in this course to a situation you have encountered. Choose one quality or patient safety concern with which you are familiar and that you have not yet discussed in this course. In a 1,250-1,500 word essay, reflect on what you have learned in this course by applying the concepts to the quality or patient safety concern you have selected. Include the following in your essay:

ORDER COMPREHENSIVE NUR-630 SOLUTIONS NOW

1. Briefly describe the issue and associated challenges.
2. Explain how EBP, research, and PI would be utilized to address the issue.
3. Explain the PI or QI process you would apply and discuss why you chose it.
4. Describe your data sources, including outcome and process data.
5. Explain how the data will be captured and disseminated.
6. Discuss which organizational culture considerations will be essential to the success of your work.This assignment uses a rubric.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

OVERVIEW OF QUALITY IN HEALTHCARE RUBRIC

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-630 NUR-630-O500 Overview of Quality in Health Care 140.0

Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) 4: Good (92.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%)
Content 100.0%
Description of Issue and Challenges 10.0% A description of the issue and associated challenges is not present. A description of the issue and associated challenges is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of the issue and associated challenges is present. A description of the issue and associated challenges is present and detailed. A description of the issue and associated challenges is present and thorough.

Utilizing EBP, Research, and PI 12.0% An explanation of how EBP, research, and PI will be utilized is not present. An explanation of how EBP, research, and PI will be utilized is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. An explanation of how EBP, research, and PI will be utilized is present. An explanation of how EBP, research, and PI will be utilized is present and detailed. An explanation of how EBP, research, and PI will be utilized is present and thorough.

PI and QI Process 12.0% An explanation of the PI or QI process that would be applied and a discussion of why it was chosen are not present. An explanation of the PI or QI process that would be applied and a discussion of why it was chosen are present, but lack detail or are incomplete. An explanation of the PI or QI process that would be applied and a discussion of why it was chosen are present. An explanation of the PI or QI process that would be applied and a discussion of why it was chosen are present and detailed. An explanation of the PI or QI process that would be applied and a discussion of why it was chosen are present and thorough.

Data Sources 12.0% An explanation of data sources, including outcome and process data, is not present. An explanation of data sources, including outcome and process data, is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. An explanation of data sources, including outcome and process data, is present. An explanation of data sources, including outcome and process data, is present and detailed. An explanation of data sources, including outcome and process data, is present and thorough.

Capturing and Disseminating Data 12.0% An explanation of how the data will be captured and disseminated is not present. An explanation of how the data will be captured and disseminated is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. An explanation of how the data will be captured and disseminated is present. An explanation of how the data will be captured and disseminated is present and detailed. An explanation of how the data will be captured and disseminated is present and thorough.

Organizational Culture Considerations 12.0% A discussion of which organizational culture considerations will be essential to the success of the work is not present. A discussion of which organizational culture considerations will be essential to the success of the work is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of which organizational culture considerations will be essential to the success of the work is present. A discussion of which organizational culture considerations will be essential to the success of the work is present and detailed. A discussion of which organizational culture considerations will be essential to the success of the work is present and thorough.

Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Total Weightage 100% OVERVIEW OF QUALITY IN HEALTHCARE, NUR-630