ACC 360 Rubric Career Preparation 2 CPA LICENSE
Write a paper (750-1,000 words) on the CPA License. The paper may be written in first person voice and must be grammatically correct. At least two external sources should be cited in the paper.
Research The CPA License, certification. Write a paper that meets the assignment expectations and explains what you learned from your research and how this will influence your accounting career.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Career Preparation 2 – Rubric
Explanation of Career Preparation Activity 10 points
Criteria Description
5. 5: Excellent 10 points
The explanation of the career preparation activity demonstrates a clear
understanding of the activity and provides additional supplemental information
regarding the relevance of the activity.
4. 4: Good 8.5 points
The explanation of the career preparation activity demonstrates a clear
understanding of the activity.
3. 3: Satisfactory 7.5 points
An explanation of the career preparation activity is complete.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 6.5 points
The explanation of the career preparation activity does not demonstrate a clear
understanding of the activity.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
An explanation of the career preparation activity is not presented.
Explanation of CP as It Relates to Career Path 7.5 points
Criteria Description
5. 5: Excellent 7.5 points
An explanation of how the career preparation activity will influence the career path
of the student demonstrates a superior understanding of career integration.
4. 4: Good 6.38 points
An explanation of how the career preparation activity will influence the career path
of the student demonstrates a clear understanding of career integration.
Collapse All
3. 3: Satisfactory 5.63 points
An explanation of how the career preparation activity will influence the career path
of the student is complete.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.88 points
An explanation of how the career preparation activity will influence the career path
of the student does not demonstrate a clear understanding of career integration.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
An explanation of how the career preparation activity will influence the career path
of the student is not presented.
Thesis Development and Purpose 1.75 points
Criteria Description
5. 5: Excellent 1.75 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. 4: Good 1.49 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and
reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory 1.31 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 1.14 points
Thesis Development and Purpose 7% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or
organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the
development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of
the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction 2 points
Criteria Description
5. 5: Excellent 2 points
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and
compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. 4: Good 1.7 points
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.
3. 3: Satisfactory 1.5 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents
minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the
purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 1.3 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There
are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not
support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing 1.25 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent 1.25 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good 1.06 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The
writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. 3: Satisfactory 0.94 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 0.81 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format 1.25 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. 5: Excellent 1.25 points
All format elements are correct.
4. 4: Good 1.06 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. 3: Satisfactory 0.94 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors
may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 0.81 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of
control with formatting is apparent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed
correctly.
Documentation of Sources 1.25 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5. 5: Excellent 1.25 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good 1.06 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory 0.94 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 0.81 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 25 points
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
