GCU HLT 515 Week 6 Discussion

GCU HLT 515 Week 6 Discussion

GCU HLT 515 Week 6 Discussion Latest

HLT515 Social Behavior and Cultural Factor in Public Health

Week 6 Discussion

DQ1

Present one theory or model of behavioral change which would be effective in a population and/or community? Presentation of the theory or model may be submitted in graphic or narrative format. Within your answer, using a scenario format, illustrate how the theory or model could be effective. Review all peer submissions and become familiar with the multiple theories and models. Respond to three peers’ posts asking any questions or verifying your own analysis of the theory/model.

DQ2

How can individual, group, and social efforts be combined to implement community behavioral change? Identify challenges which may result from your suggestions. Review three peers’ postings and provide possible solutions for the challenges that may arise.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER GCU HLT 515 Week 6 Discussion Latest

HLT515 Social Behavior and Cultural Factor in Public Health

Week 6 Assignment

Collaborative Learning Community: Peer Review of Research Paper

This is a CLC assignment.

The final Research Paper is assigned and due in Topic 7.

For this peer review assignment:

On Day 1 of Topic 6, post the rough draft of your Research Paper to the CLC Forum.

Selected members will review their assigned papers by completing the “Peer Review Guide.” If a team member does not submit a final draft, contact the instructor, and an additional peer review will be done on another paper.

Post the completed “Peer Review Guide” to the thread of the initial paper.

Submit the completed “Peer Review Guide” to the instructor.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Peer Review Guide

Directions:Read through the questions below then proceed to peer-review one class member’s paper. For questions which do not require a yes/no response, answers should be longer than one sentence and provide constructive feedback. You will be graded on your ability to accurately and thoroughly evaluateapeer’s work in order to maintain or enhance its quality.

Author:

Peer Reviewer:

1)            Does the writer provide an introduction which is a concise synopsis of the purpose of the paper and a general introduction to the target population and the health issue?

0Yes0 No

2)            What components of the assignment criteria need additional clarity?

3)            Was there anything that was confusing?0  Yes   0 No

If yes, what was it?

4)            Are the details and examples supportive to the topics? 0  Yes   0 No

If no, what needs clarification?

5)            What is good about the writing? Why is it good?

6)            What errors need to be corrected?

7)            What specific suggestions for improvement can you make?

8)            Does the conclusion make recommendations to resolve the health issue within the target population based on current literature?0Yes0 No

9)            Are two peer-reviewed resources used?0Yes0 No

10)          Have APA guidelines been followed?0Yes0 No