Compare and Contrast the concept of disci

THE PRESENTATION OF SELF 1

IN

EVERYDAY LIFE

ERVING GOFFMAN

University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre

Price : Ten Shillings

THE PRESENTATION OF SELF IN

EVERYDAY LIFE

ERVING GOFFMAN

University o f Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre $9 George Square, Edinburgh S

Monograph No. 2

1956

o

M asks are a r re s te d e x p r e s s io n s and adm irable e c h o e s of fee l ing , a t o n ce fa i th fu l , d i s c re e t , and s u p e r la t iv e . L iv in g th in g s in c o n ta c t with the a ir must a c q u ir e a cu t ic le , and it i s not u rged a g a in s t c u t i c l e s tha t they are not h e a r t s ; yet some p h i lo s o p h e r s seem to be angry with im a g es for not being th ings , and with words for not being f ee l in g s . Words and im ages are l ik e s h e l l s , no l e s s in teg ra l p a r t s o f na tu re than are the sub s t a n c e s they cover , but be t te r a d d re s se d to the eye and more open to o b se rv a t io n . I would not say th a t s u b s ta n c e e x i s t s for the s a k e of a p p e a ran c e , or f a c e s for the s a k e of m asks, or the p a s s io n s for the s a k e of poetry and vir tue . Nothing a r i s e s in n a tu re for the s a k e o f any th ing e l s e ; a l l th e s e p h a s e s and p ro d u c ts are involved eq u a l ly in the round of e x i s t e n c e ………….

George S an tayana 1

1 S o lilo q u ie s in E n g land and L a te r S o lilo q u ie s (N ew Y o rk : S c r ib n e rs , 1922), pp. 131-132.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

T h e repor t p re se n te d here w a s deve loped in connect ion with a study of in te rac t io n un d er ta k en for the Department of Social A nthropology and th e Socia l S c ie n c e s R e sea rch Committee of the U n ivers i ty of Edinburgh and a s tudy of so c ia l s t ra t i f ica t io n su p p o r ted by a F ord F o u n d a tio n grant d irec ted by P ro f e s s o r E. A. S h i ls a t the U n ivers i ty o f C h icago . I am grateful to th e s e s o u r c e s of g u id a n c e and support. I would l ik e to e x p re s s th a n k s to my t e a c h e r s C. W. M .H art , W. L. Warner, and E. C. H ughes . [ want, too, to thank E l iz a b e th Bott, J a m e s L i t t le jo h n , and Edward B anfie ld , who he lped me at the beginning of the study, and fe l lo w -s tu d e n ts o f o c c u p a t io n s a t the U niversi ty o f C hicago who he lped me la te r . Without the co l lab o ra t io n of my wife, A ngelica S. Goffman, th i s report would not have been written.

PREFA CE

1 mean th i s report to s e rv e a s a sort of handbook de ta i l in g one so c io lo g ic a l p e r s p e c t iv e from which soc ia l l i fe can be s tu d ied , e s p e c ia l l y th e kind of s o c ia l l i fe tha r i s o rgan ised w ith in th e p h y s ic a l co n f ines of a build ing or p lant. A se t of f e a tu re s will be d esc r ib ed which toge ther form a framework th a t can be ap p l ied to any conc re te soc ia l e s tab l ish m e n t , be it dom estic , in d u s t r ia l , or commercial.

T h e p e r s p e c t iv e employed in th i s report i s tha t of the th e a t rical perform ance ; the p r in c ip le s derived are dramaturgical ones . I sh a l l co n s id e r the way in which the individual in ordin ary work s i t u a t io n s p r e s e n ts h im self and h is ac t iv i ty to o thers , the w ays in which he gu ides and co n tro ls the im press ion they form of him, and the k in d s of th in g s he may and may not do while su s ta in in g h is perform ance before them. In using th i s model I will a t tem pt not to make l ight of i t s obv ious inadequa c ies . T h e s ta g e p r e s e n t s th in g s tha t are m ake-believe ; presum ably life p r e s e n t s th in g s th a t are rea l and som e tim es not well rehearsed . More important, pe rhaps , on the s ta g e one p layer » re s e n ts h im self in the gu ise of a c h a ^ .c te r to c h a ra c te r s pro je c te d by o ther p la y e r s ; the a u d ien c e c o n s t i tu t e s a th ird party to th e in te ra c t io n —one that i s e s s e n t i a l and yet, if th e s ta g e perform ance were rea l, one tha t would not be there . In rea l life , the th ree p a r t i e s are com pressed into tw o ; the part o n e indi v idual p la y s i s ta i lo red to the p ar ts p layed by the o th e rs pre s e n t , and yet th e se o the rs a l so c o n s t i tu te th e au d ien c e . Still o ther in a d e q u a c ie s in th i s model will be co n s id e red la ter.

T h e i l lu s t r a t iv e m ater ia ls used in th is s tudy are of mixed s t a tu s : some are taken from re sp e c ta b le r e s e a r c h e s where qual if ied g e n e ra l i s a t io n s are given concern ing re l iab ly recorded r e g u la r i t ie s ; some are taken from informal memoirs written by colourful p e o p le ; many fall in between. The ju s t i f ica t io n for th i s approach ( a s I ta k e to be the ju s t i f ica t io n for Simmei’ s also) i s tha t the i l lu s t r a t io n s together fit into a coherent frame work that t i e s toge ther b i ts of exper ience the reader h a s a lready had and p rov ides the s tuden t with a guide worth te s t in g in c a s e – s tu d i e s ’of in s t i tu t iona l so c ia l life.

The framework i s p resen ted in log ical s te p s . T he intro duction i s n e c e s s a r i lv a b s t ra c t and may be skipped.

T A B L E OF C O N T EK T S

PA G E

A c k n o w le d g e m e n ts

P r e f a c e

'N T R O D U C T IO N ……………………………………………………………………. 1

C H A P .

i P E R F O R M A N C E S …………………………………………………… 10

II TEAM S ……………………………………………………………………. 47

i l l R E G IO N S AND R EG IO N BEH A V IO U R . . . 66

iV D I S C R E P A N T R O L E S ………………………………….. 87

V COMMUNICATION OUT O F C H A R A C T E R . . . 107

VI T H E A R TS O F IM PRESSION M A N A G EM EN T . . . 132

VII CO N C LU SIO N …………………………………………………… 152

INTRODUCTION

When an ind iv idual e n te r s th e p r e s e n c e of o th e rs , they commonly s e e k to a c q u i re information abou t him or to bring in to p la y information abou t him a l re a d y p o s s e s s e d . T hey w ill be in te r e s te d in h is gene ra l so c io -e co n o m ic s t a tu s , h is con c ep t io n of s e l f , h i s a t t i tu d e toward them, h is com petence , h i s tru s t w o rth in ess , e tc . Although som e of th is inform ation s e e m s to be sough t a lm ost a s an end in i t s e l f , there a re u su a l ly qu ite p rac t i c a l r e a s o n s for acq u ir in g it. Information abou t the ind iv idual h e lp s to def ine the s i tu a t io n , en a b l in g o the rs to know in ad v an c e what he w ill ex p e c t of them and w hat they may ex p e c t of him. Informed in th e s e w ays , the o th e rs will know how b es t to a c t in o rder to c a l l forth a d es ire d r e s p o n s e from him.

F o r t h o s e p re se n t , many s o u rc e s of inform ation become a c c e s s ib l e and many c a r r ie r s (or ' s i g n – v e h i c l e s ’) become a v a i l a b le for convey ing th i s information. If u n ac q u a in ted with the ind iv idual , o b s e rv e rs can g le an c lu e s from h is conduc t and a p p e a ran c e which a l low them to apply the ir p rev io u s ex p e r ie n c e with in d iv id u a ls roughly s im ila r to the one before them or, more important, to app ly u n te s te d s te re o ty p e s to him. T h ey can a l so a s su m e from p a s t ex p e r ien c e tha t only in d iv id u a ls o f a p a r t ic u lar kind a re l ik e ly to be found in a g iven so c ia l se t t ing . They c a n re ly on w hat the ind iv idual s a y s about h im se lf or on doc um entary e v id e n c e he p rov ides a s to who and what he i s . If ttiey know, or know of, the ind iv idual by v ir tue of e x p e r ien c e prior to th e in te rac t io n , they c a n re ly on a s su m p t io n s a s to the p e r s i s t e n c e and g en e ra l i ty o f p sy ch o lo g ica l t r a i t s a s a m eans of p red ic t in g h is p r e s e n t and future behaviour.

How ever, during the per iod in which the ind iv idual i s in the im m ed ia te p r e s e n c e of th e o the rs , few e v e n ts may o ccu r which d i re c t ly prov ide the o th e rs with the c o n c lu s iv e in fonnat ion they will need if th e y are to d i r e c t w ise ly the ir own ac t iv i ty . Many c ru c ia l f a c ts l i e beyond the time and p la c e of in te rac t io n or l i e c o n c e a le d within it. For- exam ple , the ' t r u e ’ o r ’ r e a l ’ a t t i tu d e s , be l ie fs , and em otions of the ind iv idual can be a s c e r t a ined on ly in d ire c t ly , through h is av o w a ls or through what

1

a p p e a r s to be involuntary e x p re s s iv e behaviour. Similarly, i f the ind iv idual o f fe rs th e o th e rs a p roduct or se rv ic e , they will o f ten find th a t during the in te rac t io n the re will be no time and p la c e im m edia te ly a v a i la b le for e a t in g the pudding th a t the proof can be found in. T h ey will b e forced to a c c e p t som e e v e n ts a s conven tiona l or natura l s ig n s of som eth ing not d i re c t ly a v a i la b le to the s e n s e s . In Ic h h e ise r ’ s t e r m s 1, th e indi vidual will have to ac t so th a t he in ten t io n a l ly or un in ten tion a l ly expresses h im self , and the o th e rs will in turn h a v e to be impressed in som e way by him.

We find, then , tha t when the individual i s in th e im m edia te p re se n c e o f o thers , h is a c t iv i ty will have a p rom issory ch a r ac te r . T h e o th e rs a re l ik e ly to find tha t they m ust a c c e p t the ind iv idual on fa i th , offering him a just return w hile he i s pre s e n t before them in exc h an g e for som eth ing w hose true va lue will not be e s ta b l i s h e d until af ter he h a s left the ir p re se n c e . (Of co u rse , the o th e rs a l so l ive by in fe ren c e in the ir d e a l in g s with the p h y s ic a l world, but it i s only in the world of so c ia l in te rac t ion tha t the o b je c t s about which they make in fe re n c e s will pu rp o se ly f a c i l i t a t e and hinder th is in fe ren t ia l p ro c e s s .) T h e s e c u r i ty th a t they ju s t i f ia b ly feel in making in fe re n c e s about the ind iv idua l will vary, of co u rse , depend ing on such f a c to rs a s the amount of p rev ious information they p o s s e s s abou t him, but no amount of su c h p a s t ev id en c e c a n en t ire ly o b v ia te the n e c e s s i t y of ac ting on the b a s i s o f in fe ren c es .

L e t u s now turn from th e o th e rs to the po in t of v iew of the ind iv idual who p re s e n ts h im se lf before them. He may w ish them to th ink highly of him, or to think tha t he th in k s h ighly of them, or to p e rc e iv e how in fac t he fee ls toward them, or to o b ta in no c lea r-cu t im p re s s io n ; he may wish to ensu re su f f ic ie n t harmony so tha t the in te rac t io n c a n be su s ta in e d , or to defraud, get rid of, co n fu se , m is lead , an tag o n iz e , or insu l t them. R e g a rd le s s o f the pa r t icu la r o b je c t iv e which the individual h a s in mind and of h i s motive for hav ing th i s o b je c t iv e , it will be in h is in te r e s t s to contro l the conduc t of the o the rs , e s p e c ia l ly their r e s p o n s iv e t rea tm en t of him. 2 T h is control is ach ieved la rge ly by influ enc ing th e def in i t ion of the s i tu a t io n which the o the rs come to formulate , and he can in f luence th is def in i t ion by ex p re s s in g h im self in such a way a s to g ive them the kind of im press ion

' G u s t a v Ic h e ise r , ‘ M isunders tand ings in Human R e la t i o n s ' , Supplement to T h e A m erica n Journa l o f S o c io lo g y , LV, (September, 1949) pp . 6-7.

a i ! e re 1 owe much to an unpubl ished paper by Tom Burns of th e U nivers i ty of Edinburgh, where the argument i s p re s e n te d rhat in a l l in te rac t ion a b a s ic under ly ing theme i s the d e s i re of e a c h p a r t i c ip a n t to gu ide and contro l the r e sp o n s e made by the o th e r s p re s e n t .

2

th a t will le a d them to a c t vo lun ta r i ly in ac co rd an c e with h i s own plan . T hus , when an in d iv idua l a p p e a r s in the p re se n c e of o th e rs , the re will u su a l ly be som e re a so n for him to m obil ize h i s a c t iv i ty s o tha t i t will co n v e y a n im p re ss io n to o th e rs which i t i s in h is in te r e s t s to convey.

I h ave s a id tha t when an ind iv idual a p p e a rs before o th e rs h is a c t io n s will in f luence the de f in i t ion of the s i tu a t io n which they com e to have . Som etim es the ind iv idual will a c t in a thoroughly c a lc u la t in g manner, e x p re s s in g h im se lf in a given way so le ly in order to give the kind of im press ion to o th e rs th a t i s l ike ly to evoke from them a s p e c i f ic re sp o n se he is co n cern ed to ob ta in . Sometimes the ind iv idual w ill be c a lc u la t in g in h i s a c t iv i ty but be re la t iv e ly unaw are th a t th is is the c a s e . Sometimes he will in te n t io n a l ly and c o n s c io u s ly e x p r e s s him se l f in a pa r t icu la r way, but ch ie f ly b e c a u s e the trad i t ion of h is group or so c ia l s t a tu s requ ire th is kind of e x p re ss io n and not b e c a u s e o f any p a r t icu la r r e s p o n s e (o ther than vague a c c e p t an c e or approval) tha t i s l ik e ly to be evoked from those im p r e s s e d by th e ex p re ss io n . Sometimes the t rad i t io n s of an ind iv idua l’s ro le will le a d him to g ive a w e ll-des igned im press ion of a p a r t ic u la r kind and yet he may be ne i the r c o n s c io u s ly nor u n co n sc io u s ly d isp o s e d to c r e a te such an im pression. T he o th e rs , in th e ir turn, may be su i tab ly im pressed by the ind iv id u a l ’s effo rts to convey som eth ing , or may s c e p t i c a l ly examine a s p e c t s of h i s a c t iv i ty of whose s ig n i f ic a n c e he i s not aware , o r may m isunders tand the s i tu a t io n and come to c o n c lu s io n s th a t are w arranted ne i ther by the in d iv id u a l’s in ten t nor by the fac ts . In any c a s e , in s o far a s the o th e rs ac t as i f the ind iv id ual had conveyed a p a r t ic u la r im press ion , we may take a funct ional or p ragm atic view and sa y th a t the ind iv idual has ’ e f fe c t i v e l y ’ p ro jec ted a g iven def in i t ion of the s i tu a t io n and ' e f f e c t i v e l y ’ fo s te red the un d ers ta n d in g tha t a g iven s t a te o f a f fa irs o b ta in s .

When we a llow tha t th e ind iv idual p r o je c ts a def in i t ion of the s i tu a t io n when he a p p e a r s before o thers , we must a l so se e chat the o th e rs , however p a s s iv e their ro le may seem to be, will th e m se lv e s e f fec t iv e ly p ro jec t a def in i t ion of the s i tu a t io n by v ir tue of the ir r e sp o n se to th e ind iv idual and by vir tue of any l in e s of ac t ion they in i t ia t e to him. Ordinarily we find th a t the d e f in i t io n s of the s i tu a t io n p ro jec ted by the severa l d ifferent p a r t i c ip a n ts are su f f ic ie n t ly a t tuned to one ano ther so th a t open c o n t ra d ic t io n will not occur. I do not mean th a t there will be the kind of c o n s e n s u s th a t a r i s e s when ea c h ind iv idual p re se n t cand id ly e x p r e s s e s what he re a l ly fe e ls and h ones t ly a g re e s

3

Similarly, a t te n d a n ts ih mental in s t i tu t io n s may feel th a t i f th e new p a t ie n t i s sharp ly put in h is p la c e the f irs t day on the ward and made to s e e who i s b o s s , much future d ifficu lty will be preven ted . 1

Given th e fac t th a t the individual e ffec tive ly p r o je c ts a defin ition o f th e s i tua t ion when he e n te r s the p r e s e n c e of o th e rs , we can a s su m e tha t ev e n ts may o ccu r within the in ter a c t io n which con tra d ic t , d isc red it , o r o th e rw ise throw doubt upon th i s p ro jec tion . When th e s e d is rup t ive e v e n ts occur, the in te rac t io n i t s e l f may come to a confused and em barrassed halt . Some of th e as su m p tio n s upon which the re sp o n se s of the par t i c ip a n t s had been p red ic a te d become un tenable , and the par t i c ip a n t s find th e m se lv e s lodged in a n in te rac t io n for which the s i tu a t io n h a s been wrongly defined and i s now no longer de f ined. At such moments the ind iv idual w hose p re se n ta t io n h a s been d isc re d i te d may feel asham ed while the o th e rs p re se n t may fee l h o s t i le , and all the p a r t ic ip a n ts may com e to feel ill a t e a s e , n o np lussed , our of coun tenance , em barrassed , exper ienc ing the kind of anom ie th a t i s generated when the minute social sy s tem o f face – to -face in te rac t ion b rea k s down.

In s t r e s s in g th e fact tha t the in i t ia l defin ition of the s i t u a t ion p ro jec ted by an individual te n d s to provide a p lan for the co -opera tive a c t iv i ty tha t fo l low s—in s t r e s s in g th is a c t io n point o f v ie w —we must not overlook the c ruc ia l fac t tha t any pro j e c te d def in i t ion of the s i tu a t io n a l so h a s a d is t in c t iv e moral c h a rac te r . It i s th is moral ch a rac te r of p ro jec t io n s th a t will ch ie f ly concern u s in th i s report. Socie ty is o rganized on the p r inc ip le tha t any ind iv idual who p o s s e s s e s ce r ta in so c ia l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s has a moral right to ex p e c t tha t o th e rs will va lue and trea t him in a correspondingly appropria te way. C onnected with th i s p r inc ip le i s a second , namely th a t an indi v idual who im plic i t ly .o r e x p l ic i t ly s ig n i f ie s tha t he has ce r ta in s o c ia l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ought to have th is claim honoured by o th e rs and ought in fac t to be what h e c la im s he is . In con se q u e n c e , when an individual p r o je c ts a def in i t ion of the s i t uat ion and thereby m akes an implicit or exp l ic i t claim to be a p e rso n of a p a r t icu la r kind, he au tom atica lly e x e r ts a moral demand upon the o thers , ob lig ing them to va lue and t rea t him in th e manner tha t p e rso n s of h i s kind h ave a right to expect . He a lso im p lic i t ly forgoes all c la im s to be th in g s he d o es not appear to b e 2 and hence forgoes the treatment tha t would be

1 Harold T a x e l , 'A uthor i ty S tructure in a Mental H osp ita l Ward’, Unpublished M aste r ’s t h e s i s , D epartment o f Sociology, U niversi ty of C h icago , 1953-

2 T h ia ro le o f the w i tn e s s in l im iting what i t i s the ind iv idua l can be h a s be e n s t r e s s e d by E x is t e n t i a l i s t s , who s e e ic a s a bas ic th rea t ro indiv idual freedom. See Je a n -P a u l Sartre ; L ’e tre e t le nean t ( P a r i s : Gallimard, 1948), p. 319 ff.

6

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.