Read this article about plagiarism, ‘Toward a Rational Response to Plagiarism,’ by Rob Jenkins. Its target audience is instructors. Share your views of the art icle. Is the author on
PART ONE :
Read this art icle about plag iarism, "Toward a Rational Response to Plagiarism," by Rob Jenkins. Its target audience is instructors. Share your views of the art icle. Is the author on track? Do Jenkins' recommendations make sense?
PART TWO:
As you read the pa p er, pay close attention to the six features of aca demic writ ing noted above. Which standards are present the pa p er? What standards (if any) are missing? How does the presence or absence of these standards affect the quality of the pa p er?
- Writers respond to what others have said about their topic.
- Writers state the value of their work and announce the plan for their papers.
- Writers acknowledge that others might disagree with the position they've taken.
- Writers adopt a voice of authority.
- Writers use academic and discipline specific vocabulary.
- Writers emphasize evidence, often in tables, graphs, and images. (348)
PART THREE:
Explain how steady market applies –not in a supply chain, but in your life as a student.
1
WORLDWIDE SEAPORT CONGESTION
A Master Thesis
Submitted to the Faculty
of
American Public University
by
James Anthony Braveboy
In Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree
of
Masters of Arts
October 2015
American Public University
Charles Town, WV
2
The author hereby grants the American Public University System the right to display these contents for educational purposes. The author assumes total responsibility for meeting the requirements set by United States copyright law for the inclusion of any materials that are not the author’s creation or in the public domain. ©Copyright 2015 by James A. Braveboy All Rights Reserved.
3
Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my late mother Willie Mae Henry whose spirit is always with me.
I also would like to dedicate this thesis to my wife, my family, my friends, and the faculty of
American Military University for standing by me and supporting me in so many ways over the
course of my studies and as I completed my thesis. Your understanding of the time and energy
displaced from pleasurable to academic pursuits is appreciated and will always be remembered.
Thank you!
4
Acknowledgements I would like to thank GOD who is the head of my life. I would like to also thank the men
and women who serve in the United States Armed Forces and those who serve the country in
numerous other incredible ways – be it law enforcement, fire fighters, paramedics, doctors and
nurses. These selfless individuals embody the American dream and what we all should strive to
be. I would also like to thank Professor Keith Wade for his guidance and support while I was
completing this thesis and my course of studies. I would also like to thank all of my professors
and instructors who have taught me during my Master’s degree experience. I have learned so
much about who I am not only as a person but as an academic, and as a citizen.
5
ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS
WORLDWIDE SEAPORT CONGESTION
by
James Anthony Braveboy
American Public University System, October 25, 2015
Charles Town, West Virginia
Professor Keith Wade, Thesis Professor
Seaport congestion, or the back-up of cargo ships in ports worldwide, is a growing phenomenon
in light of the globalization of the container shipping industry. Cargo ships filled with
merchandise sit in ports for many weeks, unable to unload, destabilizing economies that depend
on maritime import/export in both the developed and developing world. Given the development
of post-Panamax, or super-sized, liners, along with alternate sea routes such as the Northern Sea
Route and the newly-widened Panama Canal, shipping should be faster and easier than ever; this
is however not the case, and this thesis explores several theories as to why. Using the U.S. West
Coast as a jumping off point, this thesis contends that that a major source of friction and
contribution to the problem of massive seaport congestion worldwide is the dissonance between
globalized worldwide shipping networks that operate on sea, and the locally-based, unionized,
and heterogeneous dock workers they encounter in port.
6
TABLE OF CONTENT CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION……………………………………..……………………………8 Problem Statement…………………………………………………………………….9 Purpose of the Study……………………………………………………………….. 13 Theoretical Framework…………………………………………………………..… 13 Definition of Key Terms…………………………………………………………… 17 Research Design and Data Analysis Method…………………………………………18 II. LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………………………19 III. METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………….……………38 U.S. West Coast Labor………………………………………………………………. 39 Analyzing Labor…………………………………………………………………… 40 Globalization Theories……………………………………………………………… 41 Ways Around………..………………………………………………………………42 IV. RESULTS………….……………………………………………………………….. 43 U.S. Labor in the Global Shipping Landscape…………………………………….. 43 Multi-port Options for Conglomerate Liner Companies……………………………47 Liner Companies as Multinational Corporations ……………………………………51 Alternate Sea Routes…………………………………………………………………55 V. DISCUSSION………..………………………………………………..…….……….58
7
Synthesis of Results…………………………………………………………………58 Recommendations…………………………………………………………………..59
List of References……………………………………………………………………62
Appendices…………………………………………………………………………. 65 Appendix 1: Summary of Documents by Category………………………………………65
Appendix 2: Map of Case Studies Relatedness to Major Topics…………………………67
Appendix 3: Theories of Labor……………………………………………………..68
Appendix 4: Ducruet and Notteboom’s Visualization of the Global Liner Shipping Network in 1996 and 2006………………………………………………………….69
8
Chapter I: Introduction
In October of 2002, operations shut down along U.S. West Coast commercial seaports
between Portland, OR and Long Beach, CA due to a labor dispute between the Pacific Maritime
Association (PMA) and the International Longshore and Warehouse Association Union (ILWU).
The result of the shutdown, as Day and Arnold (2002) noted, was that over one hundred and fifty
freighters were sitting stagnant off the U.S. West Coast (p. 35), unable to unload their cargo. The
seaport congestion caused by the 2002 shutdown posed major complications that could have
potentially altered both logistics and the economy worldwide. In 2002, concerns over effects on
the market were swirling. Economic theorists predicted a transnational marketplace meltdown
affecting the U.S., Asia and Oceania (Woodyard, 2002, p. 5), but President Bush’s use of Taft-
Hartley Act managed to rescue the economy and squash anxiety for the next twelve years.
Tension along the stretch from Portland to Long Beach skyrocketed once again in
February 2014, as congestion reached a critical due to labor disputes. Not surprisingly, this
second incident resulted in many companies deciding against shipping to U.S. West Coast ports
in favor of new alternatives. The recent labor-induced congestion along the West Coast seaports
is related to several issues unique to the contemporary globalized seaport and maritime economy.
As Burnson (2015) points out, the post-Panamax era ushered in new scenarios for both labor and
logistics (Logistics Management). Many of these new challenges continue today not only to
rework and reroute seaport congestion, but also how we think about global shipping and
logistics, congestion on the seas, and the maritime economy.
Proposed resolutions to the contemporary issues of seaport congestion include opening
the Northern Sea Route along the Arctic Circle in Russia (Blunden, 2012). McCalla et al. (2004)
describe the way that globalization has created a lag in the container shipping industry between
9
ultra-modern at-sea operations, which are highly conglomerated, and land (dock) operations,
which still run heterogeneously. According to Jaffe (2010), the rapid divergence of new super-
sized (post-Panamax) freight liners away from congested West Coast ports via the Panama Canal
to Gulf and East Coast ports also destabilizes the monopoly on competitive wages that the West
Coast-based ILWU historically has had over the East Coast-based International Longshoremen’s
Association (ILA). Ducruet and Notteboom (2012) illustrate the shift in port hierarchies through
a series of network maps that reveal the decreasing importance of the U.S. West Coast ports and
overall congestion worldwide, indicating not solutions created by global reorganization, but
simply reorganization in the face of rapid global growth.
The general problem faced by commercial shipping industry today is unresolved
worldwide seaport congestion. An unanswered question remains: is globalization incompatible
with the shipping industry, or does the industry simply need to catch up in order to resolve issues
such as congestion? The discrepancies within the global shipping industry that are in contention
today are problems of old methods meeting new, but the question begs further examination. This
document will assess the contemporary causes and proposed solutions to worldwide seaport
congestion and identify the challenges that contribute to the ongoing problem. Also included in
this document will be the purpose of study, significance of the problem, research questions,
definition of key terms, research design and data analysis method.
Problem Statement
General Problem
Before the era of modern globalized business, seaport operations were run
heterogeneously both on the high seas and on the docks; multiple companies operated lines on
the oceans, and multiple companies and operated on the docks and in the ports. Shipping lines, of
10
which there were many, chose where to dock and unload their cargo based on the best rates they
could negotiate with port authorities and longshoremen. While the latter is still true, the era of
multiple shipping companies is disappearing in favor of a conglomerate model at sea –a result
typical of globalization. The clash between large conglomerate companies at sea and multiple,
small-interest companies and workers on the docks have contributed directly to seaport
congestion in the contemporary era as labor disputes become more frequent.
Superficially, seaport congestion appears to be the result of human need in an era when
business increasingly neglects the human, but research proves it a complex and tangled web of
various interests, both human and economic. Workers fighting for fair wages, safe conditions,
and proper working hours prompt slowdowns or even shut downs of business along the docks,
which in turn causes congestion along whole stretches of seaports. Large cargo liner companies,
often in conjunction with the port cities competing for their business, have sought to revolve
congestion issues by widening important waterways such as the Panama Canal so that larger
ships may pass through to different ports and deal with different companies and laborers.
Logistics theorists have also considered alternate sea routes; consequently, politicians have
argued over who can claim the Arctic Ocean paths above Russia, or whether or not it is safe to
dock ships near Yemen. A general problem of the modern globalization of the seaport shipping
industry, however, is the lack of resolution at the level of human labor relationships. This can be
seen, as McCalla, Slack, and Comtois (2004) and others have noted, in countless examples of
labor struggles in industrial ports, resulting in massive seaport congestion – where globalized
ocean liner companies have docked in an attempt to do business with unionized, heterogeneous
maritime land laborers.
11
Specific Problem
The two major labor disputes within twelve years on the U.S. West Coast have proven
the potential of local labor relations to break down worldwide economies by clogging the
network at its most basic level. Between the 2002 shut down and the 2014 slowdown, a marked
change has taken place. As Fransoo and Lee (2013) point out, “containerized ocean transport has
become the lifeline of almost any global supply chain (p. 253). Since the early 1990s
containerized transport has been growing at almost three times the world GDP rate of growth,
and yet now an unbridled potential has come into play: The Panama Canal expansion project,
which has an intended completion date of April 2016, symbolizes the globalization-era shipping
industry (Allen, 2012). The term post-Panamax comes from this literal and figurative expansion.
Oversized cargo ships already dock in ports Southampton, and Liverpool UK (“CMA CGM
Marco Polo visits UK for first time,” (2012), and with the expansion nearing completion, they
will soon be moving freight around the world en masse (Ducruet and Notteboom, 2012).
According to Olney (2003), ILWU membership of longshoremen, clerks, and foremen on
West Coast docks had remained steady from 1980-2000, but the amount of cargo handled on the
docks increased by 128%, while employment of workers overall had increased by over 50%
from 190,000 to 290,000 (p. 39). Therefore, almost half of the employees working on West
Coast docks did not have collective bargaining rights, and according to Olney were working in
terrible conditions. Today, as Brunson (2015) notes, shippers are sick of back up and congestion
on the West Coast: “Total imports along the East Coast have increased by 16% while import
traffic along the West Coast is down by 4% (para. 4).” Not only does this shift represent a shift
in logistics made possible by the post-Panamax moment, but is also represents a vast shift in the
dynamics of human labor. Resolving seaport congestion at the level of business logistics in the
12
era of the globalized economy indeed seems irreconcilable with the demands of human labor on
land, and so this paper asks whether the two can continue to cohabitate, as Hesse (2006)
suggests, or if another business model is needed to sustain the industry and economy.
Type of study
This study will be a mixture of qualitative and quantitative data that will examine the
causes and proposed resolutions to seaport congestion, with specific emphasis on globalization
of the container shipping industry, as well as organized labor. It will utilize present statistics on
labor and shipping from recent studies and compare them against studies that predate the post-
Panamax era for optimal efficacy (Blunden, 2012; Ducruet and Notteboom, 2012; Fransoo and
Lee, 2013; Muirhead et al. 2015). Maps and charts also help to explain the present redirection of
cargo ship congestion in seaports worldwide. Where present research is deemed inadequate or
inaccurate, suggestions will be proposed and alternatives examined. To provide a fair scope,
labor issues will be investigated from the perspective of both the unions (ILWU and the ILA)
and the Pacific Maritime Association, while issues related to the Panama Canal will also be
investigated from multiple perspectives (developed versus developing world, and multiple
political and economic views, for example) (Boyle 2015).
Additional qualitative review in the form of textual analysis of sources such as primary
sources from the two West Coast incidents place and give voice to the element of human labor
that is so deeply in contention with the global marketplace that the cargo liner system
increasingly operates within (Burnson, 2015; Cummings et al. 2002; Day and Arnold, 2002;
Mongelluzzo, 2015; The Economist 2002; Woodyard 2015). This methodology ensures both a
sound analytic approach to the problem of seaport congestion while also helping to identify and
13
address the lack of discourse around human labor in the global marketplace within the container
shipping industry.
Purpose of Study
The importance of this assessment is to provide an alternate perspective to shipping
companies, port authorities, maritime associations, and union leaders and laborers of the
relationship between large conglomerate ocean liner companies and small, heterogeneous land
workers in order to prevent (what are otherwise preventable) situations of seaport congestion due
to lack of understanding between the two groups. Breaking down the complex problem into a
dialogue which accounts for all sides of the issue can and should result in smoother seaport
operations and a stronger seaport community. By validating measures such as post-Panamax as
essential components of a globalized economy, yet not the solution to worldwide seaport
congestion, parties can remove some of the stigma from the building of these larger ships and
focus on building relationships with workers and employers instead. This assessment will assist
with exploring modern economic trends in seaports, promote healthy labor-employer
relationships in a global maritime context, and generate new ideas about ways in which
congestion at seaports worldwide can be alleviated vis à vis inter-organizational negotiation. The
scope of this assessment is multidisciplinary and as such extant research is far-reaching; this
assessment draws from recent works in economics, logistics, business, and political science with
the intention to add complexity and nuance to these fields.
Theoretical Framework
Hypothesis
Globalization has vastly altered the container shipping industry. As McCalla et al. (2004)
note, the differences in carrier lines have all but disappeared, and these “conformities are best
14
seen in the extension of services to all world markets through the alliances or multinational
mergers among the world’s largest shipper container companies” (p. 474). This, however, is not
the case for maritime land operations which as the authors note remain, “differentiated and
distinctive.” In other words, conglomeration defines sea operations while specialization defines
those on the docks. This marked contrast at least in part accounts for some of the massive seaport
congestion experienced worldwide recently. With the implicit industrial emphasis on profit, and
the innovative drive, as demonstrated by the ongoing widening of the Panama Canal to
accommodate super-sized liners and provide access to more ports, and the promotion of alternate
sea routes to alleviate congestion, the at-sea globalization model is the privileged business
model, leaving heterogeneous land operations behind. When sea and land operations go toe to
toe in the ports under this new globalized atmosphere, the dissonance is clear and can be
confirmed in the resultant labor strikes and slowdowns that directly cause seaport congestion,
affecting the global cargo shipping industry and the economy worldwide.
Significance of the Problem
During the 2002 shut down of the U.S. West Coast ports, up to 150 freighters sat off the
coast of Long Beach, causing shipping companies to look for alternate accommodations, and
losing up to $1 billion in revenue per day as business stagnated. The shutdown prevented
Americans from getting goods such as produce and poultry from other countries, and was also
troubling to countries such as Pakistan, where the economy relies on clothing industry-related
exports and the need to fulfill multilateral trade quotas for these products (Day and Arnold,
2002). The potential for economic disaster is inherent in letting freighters sit along the coast. The
wide-reaching effects of seaport congestion demonstrate the fragility of the globalized economic
model in that multiple linked economies have the potential to collapse based on a simple shut
15
down of two or three major ports in one country. While the U.S. has a developed economy,
smaller developing countries would have a much harder time recovering from such a collapse.
As Mongelluzzo (2015) points out, the effect seaport congestion caused by port shut downs
could devastate the economies of East Asia (“LA-Long Beach, Oakland, PNW reaches critical
level”).
Additionally, the focal cause of seaport congestion discussed in this paper – a friction
between multinational at-sea operators and specialized maritime land labor – has not fully been
explored from the perspective of land labor, taking into consideration the modern needs and
demands of dock workers. Studies such as Blunden (2012), Ducruet and Notteboom (2012),
Jaffee (2010), and Turnbull and Wass (2007) among others, all cite this dissonance but do not
explore the nuances of maritime land labor from land labor’s perspective. Clues as to why and
how seaport congestion emerges from this point of contention are found in labor journal articles
about specific incidents (such as Olney’s 2003 “On the Waterfront” analysis of the 2002
shutdown), but this thesis attempts to provide a more complete picture by combining existent
research on globalization with such case studies in order that the cause of these problems
becomes better understood, and hopefully, avoidable.
Research Questions
The primary research question of this assessment is: Would a reconciliation between
heterogeneous, multi-company, often unionized land (dock) labor and homogenous,
conglomerate shipping lines operating at sea alleviate seaport congestion? Are other
stakeholders, such as port authorities, regional and national governments, non-unionized labor,
and hinterland transport companies equally to blame for this problem? The disparity between
pre- and post-Panamax freight shipping, which can also be described as container shipping
16
before and after hyper-globalization, causes friction in the supply chain, but this is only one
element that contributes to congestion worldwide. Theorists also postulate that congestion is due
to the increased demand for seasonal products, and emergent retail cycles, increased liner traffic,
new access to ports in the developing world due to the opening of the Panama Canal expansion,
among other reasons. However, in the age of post-Panamax, while many focus on economics
trends and the truly awesome logistics of the new super-sized container ships built especially for
the Panama Canal’s new third set of locks, it is worthy to examine the reasons that U.S. West
Coast ports is losing business due to repeated bouts of congestions offshore directly resultant
from disputes at the human/land versus corporation/sea level.
Secondary questions include: What are the benefits to a globalized maritime economy,
and is it possible or even preferable to maintain a heterogeneous economy on the docks? Post-
Panamax liners are beginning to dock in ports around the world and may potentially bring
growth to the economies of the communities they are landing upon. Globalization links networks
of economies together through supply chains that necessitate organization that the container
shipping industry is still working out, possibly at the expense of organized and working class
labor. It is still unclear what will happen in the future between large organizations that control
shipping such as the Pacific Maritime Association, and the unions that control labor on the
docks.
Additional questions: Do alternate “solutions” to the problem of seaport congestion, such
as the Northern Sea Route, operate like a band aid, and neglect to address the real problem at its
core and instead redirecting attention for the time being elsewhere in order to bide time and clear
the air, so to speak? Politically charged conversations over international waters and war-torn
territories stir up animosities between already fragile international political relationships. It
17
would seem prudent to shift away from such temporary solutions in order to find a successful
and lasting option to meet this challenge.
Definition of Key Terms
Alternate Sea Routes: the next operationally-ready sea shipping routes, such as the Northern
Sea Route in the Arctic Ocean above Russia, which could potentially replace the more congested
sea shipping routes such as those running through the Panama and Suez Canals (Blunden 2012,
pp. 115-129).
Conglomerate Liner Companies: As a result of globalization, shipping liner companies have
become conglomerates, or merged together under one multinational corporation while still
appearing to remain as distinct smaller companies (McCalla, Slack, and Comtois 2004, pp. 473-
487).
Containerization: A system of intermodal freight transport using containers of a standard size
made of weathering steel. Containers can be loaded and unloaded onto ships, railways, and semi-
trailer trucks without being opened, and are tracked using computerized systems (Ducruet and
Notteboom 2012, pp. 395-423).
Globalization: The international integration of politics, economies, worldviews, and cultures
(Hesse 2006, pp. 570-596).
ILA: International Longshoremen’s Association (East and Gulf Coast labor union).
ILWU: International Longshore and Warehouse Union (West Coast Labor Union).
Maritime Land Labor: Dock workers and other land laborers who work in ports. Workers can
be unionized or not, but workers with union contracts often receive better wages and working
conditions due to their collective bargaining power (Olney 2003, pp. 31-40).
18
Multinational Corporation (MNC): Organization that owns the means of production or
products in more than one country aside from their own (Abdulsomad 2014, pp. 415-426).
PMA: Pacific Maritime Association (association that controls land labor in West Coast ports).
Research Design and Data Analysis Method
This research design that will be used in this thesis will be a mixture of quantitative and
qualitative data that will examine the causes and proposed resolutions to seaport congestion, with
specific emphasis on globalization of the container shipping industry, as well as organized labor.
It will utilize present statistics on labor and shipping from recent studies and compare them
against studies that predate the post-Panamax era for optimal efficacy (Blunden, 2012; Ducruet
and No
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.