What do you want to know more about? What do you want to hear your classmate’s opinions on?

• What do you want to know more about? What do you want to hear your classmate’s opinions on?
• Compare to what you have learned in other courses or current events (news)
• Focus on the scholarship
• A part of the film that you found confusing and why

Comments:

• Personal insights (This reminds me of)(I thought that)
• Provide analysis
• Feel free to get creative! You could comment something such as, “If I were to recreate this film” or “If I had written this film…”
• This film/article taught me…
• How could this film be used to…?
• This film does not accurately portray
• The film’s use of x… (lighting, dialogue, etc.)
• The author of X article might state that…
• Based on the film, people may assume that… (can be positive or negative)
• The people/events portrayed in the film…
• Comparison to other films we have watched
• Critique: you do NOT have to like the film or agree with its point of view! We will always talk about both the positives and negatives
• Interpretation with context
  • I do not think this film portrayed X event well because…
  • The author of X article accurately analyzed the film…
  • The author of X article DID NOT accurately analyze the film…
• This film does a good job of explain X topic/politician/branch of government.

Don’ts:

• Do not summarize the movie or articles
• Do not ask biographical info. about the film (“Who directed this film”)
• Broad question: “What is the theme”
• Obvious answers (Is this film about Vietnam?)
• Ask the same question each week (I will check/know!)
• Ask questions before watching/reading
• Assume the film is a perfect representation of what it sets out to portray!

Grading criterion:

1. Degree of completion: Must include three separate questions or comments

2. Followed instructions:

a. Clear that student spent time thinking critically about the film and/or required reading (where applicable)

b. Followed the tips above and provided complex/scholarly insights and thoughtful questions

c. Submitted on time (I will accept late questions, but points will be taken off based on how late the assignment wassubmitted)

d. Submitted as word document

thats the format for the weekly work

Watch: Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939) a. Rating: N/A (volence and gore (mild), profanity (mild), alcohol, drugs, and smoking (mild))b. Link: http://bit.ly/1mq7733

2. Read: a. Valerie P. Hans, Deliberation and Dissent: 12 Angry Men versus the Empirical Reality of Juries, 82 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 579 (2007).

b. Judith S. Kaye, Why Every Chief Judge Should See 12 Angry Men, 82 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 627 (2007).

c. Nancy S. Marder, The Banality of Evil: A Portrayal in 12 Angry Men, 82 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 887 (2007).

d. Lynn M. Sanders, Against Deliberation, 25 Political Theory 347 (1997).

okay. this work gonna be same as the last weeks.

Great work, Eren. In the future, try to include a comment or question that ties in the scholarly reading!

this is the feedback from the professor for the last work.

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.