Make Capstone Presentation
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →APA FORMAT use paper for powerpoint
Intro
Thesis sentence
Problem statement
*themes
And issues
Why is this Important
General historical context
Or list topics
Current research
Theoretical framework
Data sources
Ground the discussion
Policy analysis
This project is about………
Policy questions
Developed with …..
Findings……
Put up charts and figures
Summary findings
Recommendations
How was it developed?
20 minutes RUBRIC BELOW
PRESENTATION/DEFENSE (50 Points)
|
Excellent (4) |
Very Good (3) |
Satisfactory (2) |
Unsatisfactory (1) |
Weight |
||||
|
Organization Rubric |
Very logical, coherent, complete |
Generally logical, mostly coherent, generally complete |
A bit scattered but acceptable, somewhat coherent, occasionally scrambled, some noticeable omissions but still understandable |
Rather hard to follow, significant omissions and/or substitutions |
10% |
|||
|
Score: |
||||||||
|
Presentation Rubric |
Clear, precise, convincing, articulate, good audience connection |
Mostly clear, good grasp of material, only occasional stumbles, minor uncertainty on some facts or details |
Occasional confusion or lack of clarity, occasional gaps in theory or important details, somewhat nervous or jittery |
A lot of confusion, not in control of facts and key details, very nervous and stiff, frequently at a loss for words |
10% |
|||
|
Score: |
||||||||
|
Public Q&A Rubric |
Quickly grasped questions, clear and apt responses, good control of both theory and findings |
Occasionally misunderstood a question, responses usually good though occasionally vague, generally apt grasp of question and how to answer |
Some misunderstanding of questions, responses may be vague or inaccurate, did not always give a full response, may answer a different question |
Frequently misunderstood a question, incorrect or inadequate responses, lack of confidence in response, argumentative |
10% |
|||
|
Score: |
||||||||
|
Interaction with material Rubric |
Clearly understood both research findings and underlying theory, could aptly contextualize or interpret findings in light of theory. |
Adequate understanding of research findings, generally understood underlying theory. |
Weak but acceptable understanding of theory, could present research findings but not always clear on implications, occasionally confused details or important findings |
Lacked adequate understanding of theory, research findings not always understood, confused or uncertain about the implications of findings, contradictions or confusion evident in how material handled |
10% |
|||
|
Score: |
||||||||
|
Response to Committee questions Rubric |
Quickly grasped questions, clear and apt responses, good control of both theory and findings |
Occasionally misunderstood a question, responses usually good though occasionally vague, generally apt grasp of question and how to answer |
Some misunderstanding of questions, responses may be vague or inaccurate, did not always give a full response, may answer a different question |
Frequently misunderstood a question, incorrect or inadequate responses, lack of confidence in response, argumentative |
||||
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds