Compose on what you think should be included in future trends of the health care system.
Compose (1,000-1,250 words) on what you think should be included in future trends of the health care system. Include the following points in your proposal about the future trends:
- Considering the incorporation of technology such as HMIS and artificial intelligence, how will technology benefit health care, how might it be regulated, and how many people in the market would have access to this technology?
- How would your future trend improve efficiency, impact quality, and promote positive patient outcomes?
- Would your proposal have an effect on profitability, financial resources, return on investment (ROI), and the rising costs of health care? How would you adjust your proposal to account for competition in the market?
- Would there be an impact if payment sources were changed?
Include at least three references, including your textbook, to support your position.
Please follow the rubric. It tells you what is to be done.
Health Care Financial Reform Proposal – Rubric
Technology 18 points
Criteria Description
Technology
5. Excellent 18 points
The essay creatively and skillfully describes the future trends of incorporating
technology in health care.
4. Good 15.3 points
The essay skillfully describes the future trends of incorporating technology in health
care.
3. Satisfactory 13.5 points
The essay clearly describes the future trends of incorporating technology in health
care.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points
The essay minimally describes the future trends of incorporating technology in
health care.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The essay does not adequately describe the future trends of incorporating
technology in health care.
Improvement of E�ciency 18 points
Criteria Description
Improvement of Efficiency
5. Excellent 18 points
The essay creatively and skillfully describes how future improvement can boost
efficiency in health care.
4. Good 15.3 points
Collapse All
The essay skillfully describes how future improvements can boost efficiency in
health care.
3. Satisfactory 13.5 points
The essay clearly describes how future improvements can boost efficiency in health
care.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points
The essay minimally describes how future improvements can boost efficiency in
health care.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The essay does not adequately describe how future improvements can boost
efficiency in health care.
Finance and Accounting 18 points
Criteria Description
Finance and Accounting
5. Excellent 18 points
The essay skillfully and thoughtfully describes the future trends of profitability,
financial resources, return on investment, and the rising costs of health care.
4. Good 15.3 points
The essay thoughtfully describes the future trends of profitability, financial
resources, return on investment, and the rising costs of health care.
3. Satisfactory 13.5 points
The essay clearly describes the future trends of profitability, financial resources,
return on investment, and the rising costs of health care.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points
The essay minimally describes the future trends of profitability, financial resources,
return on investment, and the rising costs of health care.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The essay does not adequately describe the future trends of profitability, financial
resources, return on investment, and the rising costs of health care.
Impact of Payment Sources 18 points
Criteria Description
Impact of Payment Sources
5. Excellent 18 points
The proposal skillfully and thoughtfully describes if there will be an impact if
payment sources were changed.
4. Good 15.3 points
The proposal thoughtfully describes if there will be an impact if payment sources
were changed.
3. Satisfactory 13.5 points
The proposal includes a basic description if there will be an impact if payment
sources were changed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points
The proposal minimally describes if there will be an impact if payment sources were
changed.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The proposal does not adequately describe if there will be an impact if payment
sources were changed.
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.4 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent 5.4 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good 4.59 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and
reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory 4.05 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.51 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Paragraph Development and Transitions 5.4 points
Criteria Description
Paragraph Development and Transitions
5. Excellent 5.4 points
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress
and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.
Paragraph structure is seamless.
4. Good 4.59 points
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit
a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are
appropriate to purpose.
3. Satisfactory 4.05 points
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in
organization or in their relationship to each other.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.51 points
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity,
coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent
connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to
purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language
use) 4.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent 4.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good 3.82 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The
writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory 3.38 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 0.9 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent 0.9 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good 0.77 points
Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory 0.68 points
Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor
errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 0.59 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of
control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely
followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources 1.8 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent 1.8 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good 1.53 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory 1.35 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 1.17 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 90 points
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.