Image result for Social and Political Philosophy
Order Instructions
Image result for Social and Political Philosophy
(Sign with words)
Course Objective(s):
CO3: Distinguish the basic concepts of moral and political philosophy.
CO6: Evaluate various approaches to the problem of free will.
Please pick one of the following questions to answer for the forum this week:
Discuss and evaluate the reasons Socrates gives for not escaping jail even though he had ample opportunity to do so. What is the nature of the “social contract” here that Socrates is following?
How could it be said that the Social Contract Theory produces an orderly society without needing to legislate a particular version of “morality” and what counts as the “good life”? How does the Social Contract avoid problems associated with the Divine Command Theory of morality for a constitutional liberal democracy such as ours in the United States of America?
Discuss John Rawls’ idea of the “Veil of Ignorance” and evaluate how it is said to establish a fair distribution of wealth. What is the purpose of the “veil” and what is it supposed to accomplish?
Discussion Guidelines:
Three posts minimum.
The initial forum response is due by Thursday at 11:55 p.m. EST and should be a substantive response to the discussion prompt.
For peer replies, respond to at least two of your classmates by Sunday at 11:55 p.m. EST and give meaningful replies that advance the discussion.
Before you post, please thoroughly edit your writing to ensure it is professional and academic. For more details about the initial post and peer replies are graded, see
Preview Rubric
PHIL LD Discussion Rubric v2.0
Criteria
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did Not Attempt
Criterion Score
Initial Response
40 points
Initial response meets the discussion prompt requirements and demonstrates understanding of the Lesson and readings. Student shares firsthand experiences and brings something new to the discussion.
34 points
Initial response mostly meets the discussion prompt requirements and demonstrates basic understanding of the Lesson and readings. Student shares firsthand experiences and/or brings something new to the discussion.
30 points
Initial response follows the discussion prompt requirements but does not demonstrate understanding of the Lesson or readings. Student does not share any firsthand experiences or bring anything new to the discussion.
26 points
Initial response does not follow the discussion prompt requirements and does not demonstrate understanding of the Lesson or readings. Student does not share any firsthand experiences or bring anything new to the discussion.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Initial Response,/ 40
Peer Replies
40 points
Student responds to peers, advances the discussion,
and does two of the following:
Poses a thoughtful question;
Shares additional content or
sources;
Shares insights or offers
perspective;
Provides alternative point-of view;
Makes additional connections to the topic.
34 points
Student responds to peers, advances the discussion,
and does one of the following:
Poses a thoughtful question;
Shares additional content or
sources;
Shares insights or offers
perspective;
Provides alternative point-of view;
Makes additional connections to the topic.
30 points
Student responds to peers, minimally advances the discussion, and does one of the
following:
Poses a thoughtful question;
Shares additional content or
sources;
Shares insights or offers
perspective;
Provides alternative point-of view;
Makes additional connections to the topic.
26 points
Student responds to peer(s) but
does not advance the discussion, and does not add to the discussion.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Peer Replies,/ 40
Writing Quality
20 points
Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error-free.
17 points
Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language has few errors.
15 points
Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors.
13 points
Uses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Writing Quality,/ 20
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
