Finally, read your classmates’ posts. A complete assignment includes your written response?to at least one post besides your own–part of your score is based on your reply to a
Finally, read your classmates' posts. A complete assignment includes your written response to at least one post besides your own–part of your score is based on your reply to at least one of your classmate's posts. It should be a meaningful reply that continues the discussion, points out something good about the post, and makes a constructive suggestion for improvement.
2-3 paragraph response to post attached. Will be turned in through safe assign. NO PLAGIARISM.
A philosophical theory based on the quality of knowledge is not possible, especially since some doubts may be raised. I won't expand on this concept further; I think the idea is clear. In reflecting on the skeptic's position, I cannot agree. One of the most notable and powerful advances against skepticism was Descartes' stance on his rationalism. With exaggerated skepticism, he shows us that it is possible to be sure of something. He would also – to dissuade the skeptics – support me on Bacon's side. Bacon made it clear that nothing is certain when it comes to acquiring knowledge, but such a position does not support the idea that it is impossible to know; what he is telling us is that unless the knowledge of reality changes, anything learned is worthwhile Reliable, so we are obliged to work again according to these changes.
As for the low reliability of knowledge from 4 specific sources, in my opinion, consult the following.
Perception, understanding perception as our first knowledge of things through the impressions imparted by the senses, it is clear, Descartes, that the senses deceive us. That way we can be sure that, on more than one occasion, when we see another thing, we believe we saw another thing. One of the most classic examples is seeing things in the dark. Especially when we are afraid. When we see large leaves moving between tree trunks, we often think we see people on dark streets. It's a way of deceiving yourself through perception.
I think memory deceives us the most, especially after we try to recall distant events. It also happens in emergency situations where a person usually provides false information when referring to the facts. For example, an individual who is the object of a robbery or witness to a criminal act generally refers to wrong data regarding the physiognomy of criminals or the way he was dressed.
Introspection, which comes from an inner observation of a person's conscience or emotions, can also be fraudulent. The classic example is when most people say they are
depressed when they are sad. Sadness is a normal emotion to some extent. depression is an illness that requires medication.
In thinking, delusions arise when one is in a hurry. All thinking generally leads to a process of discovering and understanding things; even in logical thinking, there can be intellectual evidence of creativity and imagination. Most people mislead their reasoning out of ignorance, prejudice, emotional imbalances, cultural patterns, rigid thinking, and a habit of seeing things from a single perspective. In this way, reason also deceives us. A classic example is people who are dedicated to trade without any experience believing that it is only about buying and selling things, without doing a detailed, detailed, preliminary study of the market in certain specific aspects.
If a source of knowledge is not reliable, it means that these sources can trick us into creating falsehoods. Is it deduced from the fact that sometimes we are wrong when we trust these sources that we are always wrong? In other words,
once we admit that we may be wrong, does that mean we have to admit that we could never, correct? How would you respond to the skeptic?
Not necessarily. Indeed, just because we sometimes make mistakes doesn't mean our entire lives will be marked by mistakes. Achievements from the simplest to the most complex aspects of life show us every day that we are successful people. One of the biggest proofs that not everything is wrong is human progress. A very interesting thing is that great victories and achievements have transcended the ruins of past failures. Prove that we can fix and improve the world of aviation; in its early days, aviation was characterized by frequent accidents due to ignorance of many of the laws of physics. Today, great advances in science and technology make flying possible. I would say to the skeptics: yes. Man is wrong, but he has always shown the ability to correct the consequences of his mistakes.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
