How do you see neuroplasticity as enhancing our understanding of brain and behavior? (300 words) How can stress hormones impact our stress response? Minimum two citations per
New
(300 words) How do you see neuroplasticity as enhancing our understanding of brain and behavior?
(300 words) How can stress hormones impact our stress response?
Minimum two citations per question:
Use the book: Carlson, N. R. (2021). Physiology of behavior. (13th). Pearson. ISBN-13-9780135455562
Module 3 Discussion
22 unread replies.22 replies.
Discussion 3
After studying Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources , discuss the following:
The St. Fleur family is well respected in the Haitian community because they are religious with great moral values. They moved to the United States because of political issues in Haiti. Ronald, the youngest son of this family, is 27 years old and lives at home with his mother and father. Recently, he began having fevers and subsequently developed pneumonia. He was admitted to the hospital, where laboratory tests were HIV positive. Ronald was in shock when the doctor informed him that he was HIV positive. He confessed to the doctor that he was gay, but he could not tell his family. He said that he did not want to bring shame to the family. Because he couldn’t be in a formal relationship disowning to his family and the Haitian community’s view of homosexuality, he has been very promiscuous over the years.
1. What are Haitians’ views of homosexuality?
2. If Ronald’s parents were to learn of his positive HIV status, how might they react if they are religious and traditional?
3. Identify three major culturally congruent strategies a healthcare provider can implement to address HIV prevention practices in the Haitian community?
Submission Instructions:
· Your initial post should be at least 600 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
· You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
· All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
· Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
· You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
|
Discussion Rubric |
|||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|||
|
Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts |
Distinguished - 5 points Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts. |
Excellent - 4 points Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. |
Fair – 2 points Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. |
Poor – 1 point Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. |
5 points |
|
Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines |
Distinguished - 3 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. |
Excellent - 2 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. |
Fair – 1 point Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. |
Poor – 0 points Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. |
3 points |
|
Response to Posts of Peers |
Distinguished - 2 points Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each. |
Fair – 1 point Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal. |
Poor – 0 points Student provided no response to a peer's post.
|
2 points |
|
|
Total Points |
10 |
,
Module 3 Discussion
22 unread replies.22 replies.
Throat, Respiratory & Cardiovascular Disorders
For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for one of the following cases. Your instructor will assign you your case number.
|
Case 1 |
Case 2 |
Case 3 |
|
|
Chief Complaint (CC) |
A 65-year-old male with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presents to the clinic with a cough he has had for the past 2 weeks. |
A 25-year-old Hispanic female, computer programmer presents to your clinic complaining of a 12-day history of a runny nose |
A 75-year-old female reports experiencing pain in her chest while walking up steps today. |
|
Subjective |
denies chest pain, denies night sweats, admits to having a fever but does not know the temp. |
States that her symptoms began about 12 days ago. She suffers from allergies; she gets a runny nose during the spring-time, pollen season. However, in the winter, her allergies are not a problem. |
Could not sleep previous night. Feels like an ache or a burning sensation at the center of sternum. Denies any arm pain, pain was at a scale of 8 in the AM now it is at a 2. Suffers from History of hypertension, denies heart disease, denies leg swelling up, denies pain feeling worse when taking deep breath. |
|
Objective Data |
|||
|
VS |
(BP) 115/75, (P) 89, (RR) 16, (T) 100.4°F (38°C), O2 sat 98% on room air. |
(BP) 115/75, (P) 89, (RR) 16, (T) 100.4°F (38°C), O2 sat 98% on room air |
BP 129/70, (HR) 72 and regular, (RR) 16 unlabored, temperature 98.8°F, oral pulse oximetry is 99% |
|
General |
patient appears tired; skin color pale, patient is diaphoretic and sweaty, height 5′3″; weight 175 lbs |
No signs of acute distress. Patient appears mildly fatigued. She is breathing through her mouth. Breathing easily. Voice has a nasal quality to it. |
obese female, alert, in no acute distress. |
|
HEENT |
EYES: no injection, no increase in lacrimation or purulent drainage; EARS: normal TM: Normal NOSE: Bilateral erythema and edema of turbinates with significant yellow drainage on the right. Obstructed air passages |
Ear canals: normal; EYES: normal; NOSE: Bilateral erythema and edema of turbinates with significant yellow drainage on the right. Nares: Obstructed air passages |
Atraumatic, normocephalic, PERRLA, EOMI, sclera with mild icterus, nares patent, nasopharynx clear, poor dentition – multiple carries. |
|
Respiratory |
lung crackles in LLL, no wheezes or rhonchi noted; does not clear with coughing; dullness to percussion over the LLL; shallow respirations and is 30, accessory muscles use not present |
CTA AP&L |
CTA AP&L |
|
Neck/Throat |
no neck swelling or tenderness with palpation; neck is supple; no JVD; thyroid is not enlarged; trachea midline |
Posterior pharynx: mildly injected, scant postnasal drainage (PND), no exudate, tonsils 1+, no cobblestoning |
carotids are 2+ without bruits; thyroid is not palpable; no lymphadenopathy |
|
Heart |
Regular rate and rhythm, no murmur, S3, or S4 |
Regular rate and rhythm, no murmur, S3, or S4 |
S1 and S2 normal without murmur, gallop, or rub |
Once you received your case number, answer the following questions:
1. What other subjective data would you obtain?
2. What other objective findings would you look for?
3. What diagnostic exams do you want to order?
4. Name 3 differential diagnoses based on this patient presenting symptoms?
5. Give rationales for your each differential diagnosis.
Submission Instructions:
· Your instructor will assign you your case number and you will post on the case number you have been assigned.
· You will reply to the other two case studies (One of each).
· Your initial post should be at least 600 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
· You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
· All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
· Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
· You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
|
Discussion Rubric |
|||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|||
|
Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts |
Distinguished - 5 points Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts. |
Excellent - 4 points Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. |
Fair – 2 points Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. |
Poor – 1 point Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. |
5 points |
|
Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines |
Distinguished - 3 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. |
Excellent - 2 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. |
Fair – 1 point Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. |
Poor – 0 points Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. |
3 points |
|
Response to Posts of Peers |
Distinguished - 2 points Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each. |
Fair – 1 point Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal. |
Poor – 0 points Student provided no response to a peer's post.
|
2 points |
|
|
Total Points |
10 |
,
|
Instructions |
|
|
Give your 2 page opinion on the future of digital identification starting with reading the provided articles below. How do you feel about digital identification? What are the implications of security, privacy and availability? (Remember to cite your resources in the proper format!) Digital Drivers License https://www.gemalto.com/govt/traffic/digital-driver-license Digital Fingerprints https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2018/01/16/digital-fingerprint-the-emerging-technology-that.html Facial Recognition: https://www.lawinsport.com/topics/articles/item/faces-in-the-crowd-legal-considerations-for-use-of-facial-recognition-technology-at-sports-arenas |
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
